• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Colorado Cop Body Slam: Footage will be release after trial

Still waiting for you to point out where I am wrong. I gave you law enforcement standards and now the standards from the department and the state laws they are based on. You STILL cannot win. This is a grade A meltdown. I love it.

Did that. And asked you to start over. Not my problem you choose to be dishonest. Anyway... unless you add something new I will take my win and move on. Bye.
 
Did that. And asked you to start over. Not my problem you choose to be dishonest. Anyway... unless you add something new I will take my win and move on. Bye.

No. You haven't. Not once have you demonstrated that according to the law...he was in the wrong. Not once. Period.
 
No. You haven't. Not once have you demonstrated that according to the law...he was in the wrong. Not once. Period.

That was never my argument... you placed that qualification onto my premise.

Fail.
 
There is literally nothing you can say to get me to agree that force was justified. If I was on a jury where she was suing him I would award her.

Apparently she had been hitting the officer; so now what would you say?
 
Apparently she had been hitting the officer; so now what would you say?

If he face planted her as she was hitting him fine... but he missed that chance and waited til she was slightly pulling away. He is guilty of excessive use of force.
 
If he face planted her as she was hitting him fine... but he missed that chance and waited til she was slightly pulling away. He is guilty of excessive use of force.

No, what happened was she has fighting him and continuing to physically resist as the video shows: down she goes.

She was using a stick to poke a growling Pit Bull...

I have no sympathy for here.
 
No, what happened was she has fighting him and continuing to physically resist as the video shows: down she goes.

She was using a stick to poke a growling Pit Bull...

I have no sympathy for here.

I would easily award her money if she sued...
 
That was never my argument... you placed that qualification onto my premise.

Fail.

If he was within the law...then you have no argument. Period. Assuming she did what she was accused of...then she should not have done that. His response was reasonable. He used a control hold and takedown technique. He didn't punch her or use weapons. He put her down. She came off her heels. Such is the risk in that type of shoe in that type of altercation.

He didn't body slam her.
 
I would easily award her money if she sued...

Because the law is irrelevant to you. Just that police are bad guys. That is all you care to see. She was actively resisting and based on local use of force, and every legitimate use of force continuum one could find...she needed to be taken down and arrested. NOT doing so would be a failure to do his duty as an officer. And would likely result in complaints about her getting special treatment for being white.
 
No, what happened was she has fighting him and continuing to physically resist as the video shows: down she goes.

She was using a stick to poke a growling Pit Bull...

I have no sympathy for here.

As much as I disapprove of the pitbull reference...she was the one escalating the situation. At least if the story is accurate and shown on body cam.
 
Yeah. She is as tall. She must also weigh the same and be as strong and be as trained and she was obviously a deadly threat. Cop was out of control here.

Your post is total bull****; she doesn't need to be equal, only a persistent threat. She even admitted what she did. Somebody grabs you on the throat, it's a sensitive place on the body. She's lucky she didn't get gut punched for that.
 
Your post is total bull****; she doesn't need to be equal, only a persistent threat. She even admitted what she did. Somebody grabs you on the throat, it's a sensitive place on the body. She's lucky she didn't get gut punched for that.

I didn't sayvshe has to be equal.

I said she has to be a valid threat.
 
I didn't sayvshe has to be equal.

I said she has to be a valid threat.

If you grab a cop's throat, you will get body slammed. If anyone grabbed my throat, I will hurt them.
 
If you grab a cop's throat, you will get body slammed. If anyone grabbed my throat, I will hurt them.

Even a small female that didn't hurt you in the slightest and many seconds later is sorta trying to pull away?
 
As much as I disapprove of the pitbull reference...she was the one escalating the situation. At least if the story is accurate and shown on body cam.

A Pit Bull is the prefect reference.
 
She did not have a weapon. She was no threat.Getting a teeny tiny girl to the ground does not require body slamming the **** out of her that could practically kill her. Cop is a ***** and so is any man that supports what he did. Cowardly. *****.

Play stupid games and you win stupid prizes. Man or woman assault an officer and it's going to be a bad day for you!
All she had to do was comply with the instructions.
 
Even a small female that didn't hurt you in the slightest and many seconds later is sorta trying to pull away?

Her pulling away is a problem. She is being lawfully arrested. She doesn't get to assault someone violently and then try to get away. Her white privilege isn't that strong. She got what was justified.
 
Back
Top Bottom