• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'Neo-Nazi' Stabbed in Colorado, After Being Judged by His Haircut

Jesse Booth said:
Yeah, we haven't talked before. I thought you might have gotten a general impression from seeing me around, though.
Click to expand...

be honest with you, I spend most of my time responding to people I take issue with. So if we've not conversed, you're probably an ok dude.
 
ThoughtEx. said:
I'm showing as much indifference to this, as you would to a black church being burned down, or seven black churches being downed. Or an unarmed black man being gunned down by police, or a 12 yo boy being shot in the park for playing with a toy gun. Or a man being choked to death for selling single cigarettes. That's what I'm doing.
Click to expand...
Thats about as disgusting and vile of a thing you could possilby do. Congrats on avoiding the high road. You should be proud.

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
 
trouble13 said:
Thats about as disgusting and vile of a thing you could possilby do. Congrats on avoiding the high road. You should be proud.

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

thank you, at least I'm honest about it...
 
ThoughtEx. said:
Don't start with me, you're one of the biggest offenders as far as dismissing minorities being targeted. Case in point the bolded. You're implying that it's groups like BLM and liberals bringing up whenever an unarmed man is gunned down, or a muslim church is bombed, that is creating the racial tension and hatred.

Tell me, when that Mosque in MN was firebombed, what was your response?
Click to expand...
Im not implying..Im stating as FACT that democrats and race baiting charlatans have been fomenting racial hatred for DECADES and do so not because they give a **** about individuals and the black American community but because they want people filled with racial hatred, they want their own bank accounts stuffed, and they want to keep people voting democrat. Thats not a unique observation. It was made back in the 60s and its as true today as it was then. And you KNOW thats true.

My first response to the mosque burning was that WHOEVER did that should be found, tried, and punished to the max. Do some digging.
 
VanceMack said:
Im not implying..Im stating as FACT that democrats and race baiting charlatans have been fomenting racial hatred for DECADES and do so not because they give a **** about individuals and the black American community but because they want people filled with racial hatred, they want their own bank accounts stuffed, and they want to keep people voting democrat. Thats not a unique observation. It was made back in the 60s and its as true today as it was then. And you KNOW thats true.

My first response to the mosque burning was that WHOEVER did that should be found, tried, and punished to the max. Do some digging.
Click to expand...

I mentioned that specifically, because it was you who posited the theory it was more likely Muslim's themselves seeking attention than a hate group.
 
ThoughtEx. said:
thank you, at least I'm honest about it...
Click to expand...
I do appriciate your honesty. Theres no reason to be anything but.

I understand there is a lot of resentment but I think your expressing it in one of the worst ways possible. Your turning the hate groups you resent into maytrs. Your advocating revenge instead of justice.

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
 
trouble13 said:
I do appriciate your honesty. Theres no reason to be anything but.

I understand there is a lot of resentment but I think your expressing it in one of the worst ways possible. Your turning the hate groups you resent into maytrs. Your advocating revenge instead of justice.

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Nope, not advocating revenge. Not exactly. I'd prefer no one get hurt. But, I'm a realist. A large reason for why we have a systemic racism problem in this country, is the indifference of people not affected by it. How do you get those people not to be indifferent. When it looks like it could affect them, piss them off when they complain about it.
 
ThoughtEx. said:
Nope, not advocating revenge. Not exactly. I'd prefer no one get hurt. But, I'm a realist. A large reason for why we have a systemic racism problem in this country, is the indifference of people not affected by it. How do you get those people not to be indifferent. When it looks like it could affect them, piss them off when they complain about it.
Click to expand...
You know you may have a point if your talking to other members of a hate group but I can tell you when your talking to the rest of us you look as hateful as the people you despise. It makes you as big of the problem as them. Is that who you want to be. Opposite side of the same coin.

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
 
trouble13 said:
You know you may have a point if your talking to other members of a hate group but I can tell you when your talking to the rest of us you look as hateful as the people you despise. It makes you as big of the problem as them. Is that who you want to be. Opposite side of the same coin.

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I could have come in with the standard, "let's wait and see what the investigation yields. not going to jump to any conclusions." That most indifferent to systematic racism employ on this site, but I'm not trying to pick a fight with those types. I'm trying to pick a fight with the more aggressively obvious posters that use the same tactic I'm using now, frequently.
 
ThoughtEx. said:
thank you, at least I'm honest about it...
Click to expand...

Since you are honest about 'being disgusting and vile' perhaps you might want to change. Those aren't good qualities.
 
ThoughtEx. said:
I could have come in with the standard, "let's wait and see what the investigation yields. not going to jump to any conclusions." That most indifferent to systematic racism employ on this site, but I'm not trying to pick a fight with those types. I'm trying to pick a fight with the more aggressively obvious posters that use the same tactic I'm using now, frequently.
Click to expand...
Fair enough

I missread your intent. I didnt realize you were trying to pick a fight for the sake of picking a fight. I read it as you being sincerely calous and spiteful. Im gonna out on this note.... Happy Hunting

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
 
ThoughtEx. said:
Gotta love people that make excuses for why targeting anyone but white people isn't a product of racism. Or deny anything should be done, until white people come under attack in a similar fashion.

Hypocrites one and all.
Click to expand...

Yourself included.
 
ThoughtEx. said:
I could have come in with the standard, "let's wait and see what the investigation yields. not going to jump to any conclusions." That most indifferent to systematic racism employ on this site, but I'm not trying to pick a fight with those types. I'm trying to pick a fight with the more aggressively obvious posters that use the same tactic I'm using now, frequently.
Click to expand...

So wanting to wait for more information and not jump to conclusions is an indicator of someone who's indifferent to racism? Well, sure, why not.
 
Last edited:
X Factor said:
So wanting to wait for more information and not jump to conclusions is an indicator of someone who's indifferent to racism? Well, sure, why not.
Click to expand...

I don't see those same people here in this thread, saying "I'll wait for more information." In fact I only see them saying it in threads that deal with a minority as the victim. Funny that.
 
ThoughtEx. said:
Gotta love people that make excuses for why targeting anyone but white people isn't a product of racism. Or deny anything should be done, until white people come under attack in a similar fashion.

Hypocrites one and all.
Click to expand...

Do you often post lies about other members? Please quote me doing what you, erroneously claim.
 
ThoughtEx. said:
I don't see those same people here in this thread, saying "I'll wait for more information." In fact I only see them saying it in threads that deal with a minority as the victim. Funny that.
Click to expand...

Maybe you're correct but I hope you're not basing it on some nebulous feeling. For your supportion to be proved correct, you'll need to compare threads to show that it is the same people viewing and contributing to both. I look forward to your results.
 
Slingshot Bob said:
Do you often post lies about other members? Please quote me doing what you, erroneously claim.
Click to expand...

My suspicion is that his claim has far more to do with your stated lean than anything you've actually done or haven't done. ;)
 
ThoughtEx. said:
;)

Tell us, do you think Trayvon Martin was murdered? Or do you think Zimmerman was completely justified...
Click to expand...

Once a self defense claim is raised, it falls not to the defendant to prove that is was self defense, but to the prosecution to prove that it wasn't (part of that pesky "innocent until proven guilty" constitutional stuff) and I believe the state did not have the evidence to disprove self defense.

Are the some people you would actually want to not have those constitutional protections?
 
X Factor said:
Once a self defense claim is raised, it falls not to the defendant to prove that is was self defense, but to the prosecution to prove that it wasn't (part of that pesky "innocent until proven guilty" constitutional stuff) and I believe the state did not have the evidence to disprove self defense.

Are the some people you would actually want to not have those constitutional protections?
Click to expand...

You see, you're slippery, I like that about you. But you didn't answer the question. I'm asking for your opinion of the events, not how the trial turned out, this isn't about stand your ground laws. It's about people who dismiss unarmed minorities being attacked using various methods, and one of those methods in my opinion is using the results of the biased system as proof nothing racist happened. In your opinion, did Zimmerman see a black man, immediately assume he was up to no good, stalk him, and then force a confrontation resulting in said black man dying? Do you think he was justified in ignoring the 911 dispatcher who told him not to pursue?
 
Slingshot Bob said:
Do you often post lies about other members? Please quote me doing what you, erroneously claim.
Click to expand...

Actually, I was using your post to further my general point. It was a great setup. I would've called you out specifically, if I felt you were someone who did that. In fact, I find that you usually side with the victims. And have almost no trust for the system, and find things generally suspicious despite official accounts. Carry-on.
 
ThoughtEx. said:
Actually, I was using your post to further my general point. It was a great setup. I would've called you out specifically, if I felt you were someone who did that. In fact, I find that you usually side with the victims. And have almost no trust for the system, and find things generally suspicious despite official accounts. Carry-on.
Click to expand...

I condemn sensless violence no matter who does it. I abhor violence.
 
Grand Mal said:
'Yahoo Beauty'? What a strange source for news. No matter, a Google of the guys name gets more sources.
This kind of crap is only going to increase, looks like. That rift in American society has been growing- no, growing is the wrong word, it's being driven wider. Doesn't look good, for the near future.

I'm separate a little from American culture, but isn't that kind of haircut a Marine Corps thing?
Click to expand...

It's a very old haircut Mal. Jack Dempsey had it in the 1920's.

ae597ce8bffec9c49f2f05fb7cf33574--sports-stars-boxer.jpg


I doubt one of the SJW twats would mess with anyone who looked like Dempsey though.
 
ThoughtEx. said:
Well, took me only a few seconds to find a quote of you questioning whether a black woman having her vagina searched on the side of the ride for 11 mins was illegal.


Yes, it's very illegal, it's a violation of her 4th amendment rights. In order to conduct a body cavity search LE have to have a warrant, or be at a port of entry, or after incarceration. That one thread alone is a gem of you dismissing LE violating that woman's rights.
Click to expand...

So your one of those huh. Take quotes out of context. I was discussing the legality with another poster. I was not dismissing the LE violating the woman's rights. Did you not see the part where I said it was disgusting and they should be fired?

ThoughtEx. said:
Here is one of you sarcastically commenting on whether systemic racism exists, after you criticized the op for using blacks.
Click to expand...

Again, out of context. Here is the OP for that (leaving dead people? how many died), and the ridiculous options. You tell me if the OP was serious.

Given the doubling down on the whole "America isn't racist!" rhetoric the day after a bunch of white nationalist nazi's march through America with torches leaving a few dead people in their wake(in 2017!!), I was curious, what would actually change your mind and make you go 'hmmm, you know what, there might actually be something to this racism thing'.

A few more dead black kids
Lots more dead black kids
A hell of a lot more black kids getting held at gunpoint, that's for sure
1 more nazi march
Like maybe a few more nazi marches would do it
President wearing a swastika
A doubling to the difference in median net worth (see post)
Black infant mortality rate increasing even more compared to whites.

But yeah, I don't buy into the white privilege thing. So that makes me responsible for Nazi's?

ThoughtEx. said:
I can keep going, but you've got all the requirements to qualify hypocrite in this case.
Click to expand...

No, no you don't.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom