• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mississippi police who fatally shot man had wrong house, DA says

RogueWarrior

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 12, 2013
Messages
4,592
Reaction score
6,124
Location
Atheist Utopia aka Reality
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Mississippi police who fatally shot man may have had wrong house, DA says - CNN.com

You attempt to serve a warrant for domestic assault in MS in the middle of the night. What could go wrong?
Brainless bullies with guns.

According to another source, the only other time the police had been to their home of 13 years was when they were robbed.
Sad way for his family to make millions.

CNN (CNN)Authorities are investigating the death of a Mississippi man who was shot dead by police while they were serving a warrant for another individual in an apparent address mix-up.

Ismael Lopez was killed at his Southaven home late Sunday in the shooting, according to Murray Wells, an attorney representing Lopez's wife, Claudia Lopez.
Southaven police referred questions to DeSoto County District Attorney John Champion, who said the officers responded to the wrong address.
Earlier that evening, a woman in nearby Tate County called police to report an assault at a Citgo gas station, according to the Tate County Sheriff's Department incident report. The sheriff's department then called the Southaven Police Department to arrest the suspect in that case, Samuel Pearman, whose address is 5878 Surrey Lane, according to the warrant.
Ismael Lopez lived across the street from Pearman, Wells said.
But the District Attorney and Claudia Lopez's attorney gave different accounts of what happened when police showed up at the Lopez residence.
According to Champion, Southaven police officers knocked on the door of the residence to ascertain if it was the correct location, but the Lopezes didn't hear the knock. He said they only heard their dog barking, and Ismael Lopez went to find out why.
Police officers say when Lopez opened the door, his pit bull charged at them, and they shot and wounded the dog. And when they looked up, Lopez was pointing a gun at them, Champion said. The officers commanded him to lower the weapon, and fatally shot him when he did not comply, Champion said.

The Lopez family attorney provided a competing narrative. He said Lopez heard the knock, and went to answer the door with his dog, when "chaos breaks out."
Wells said police shot through the door of the home, killing Ismael Lopez, who was unarmed. Wells said bullet holes can be seen through the front door.
Wells said there were two guns in the house -- one in the bedroom, where police later found it, and a rifle on the couch, which he said was not near Lopez's body, and had no blood on it when police found it.
"What she's certain about is that she didn't hear any verbal commands," Wells said. "She didn't hear them say 'put down the gun.'"
Southaven police haven declined to provide a police incident report, and would not comment on the status of the officer or officers involved in the case.
Champion said the address mix-up may have occurred because mailboxes in the area are clumped together.
"There were no numbers on the houses, so when the officers got there, they went to the address they thought was the address they had been asked to go to," Champion said.
But Wells said the area is clearly marked.


He said the family is considering filing a civil rights violation against police.
"His wife is as distraught as a human can be," he said, adding she isn't interested in money, she just wants to make sure her husband's name is cleared. "Everyone loved him."
The Mississippi Bureau of Investigation is handling the police shooting investigation.
 
He said the family is considering filing a civil rights violation against police.

Suing the police for civil rights violations? In Mississippi? Good luck. :(
 
Suing the police for civil rights violations? In Mississippi? Good luck. :(

No kidding.

This is where all types of police immunity should end. If they cause harm or damage through something like storming the wrong address they should be fully liable.
 
Why are our police acting like they are soldiers invading hostile territory?
 
Why are our police acting like they are soldiers invading hostile territory?
Because they’re operating in environments here people set dangerous dogs on strangers and have rifles lying around on their sofas?
 
The family will sue for millions and the taxpayers will foot the bill.

Police officers need to be made personally responsible when they **** up like this.
 
Because they’re operating in environments here people set dangerous dogs on strangers and have rifles lying around on their sofas?

That sofa could have shot those cops!
 
Why are our police acting like they are soldiers invading hostile territory?

They like to get jacked up and assassinate people from time to time...
 
I would hope I had the sensibility to retaliate legally.

Identify the officers involved, buy up their mortgages and liabilities, call all the loans in, and turn them out into the gutter.
 
Why are our police acting like they are soldiers invading hostile territory?

Because they’re operating in environments here people set dangerous dogs on strangers and have rifles lying around on their sofas?

Strange that you say that when (A) I really don't have much of any recollection of people setting "dangerous dogs on strangers" as some kind of trend, (B) we have a robust 2nd Amd. to bear arms.


I also don't see the possibility of danger existing in any given location as justifying police acting like invading soldiers. It did not used to be this way and it's not like violent crime is new to America. In fact, it's been on a very large downward trend since the 60s. Things are much safer for cops - for all of us - if anything.
 
Strange that you say that when (A) I really don't have much of any recollection of people setting "dangerous dogs on strangers" as some kind of trend, (B) we have a robust 2nd Amd. to bear arms.


I also don't see the possibility of danger existing in any given location as justifying police acting like invading soldiers. It did not used to be this way and it's not like violent crime is new to America. In fact, it's been on a very large downward trend since the 60s. Things are much safer for cops - for all of us - if anything.

Homicide numbers have remained the same, while other violent crime has risen in line with the change to population.

Being a police officer is dangerous enough, but there's been an uptick in violence against officers recently;

Gun-related incidents were the top cause of death, according to the memorial fund report, with 64 officers shot and killed. Of the 64, 21 were the result of ambush attacks, the report says.
Twenty officers died in eight multiple-shooting death incidents in 2016, including the Dallas and Baton Rouge attacks, tying with 1971 for the highest total of any year since 1932, the report said.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-down-police-deaths-hit-5-year-high/95984998/

I've heard of officers who served 2 tours in Afghanistan without a serious injury, only to be shot or seriously injured on the streets of the US working for the PD.
 
Strange that you say that when (A) I really don't have much of any recollection of people setting "dangerous dogs on strangers" as some kind of trend, (B) we have a robust 2nd Amd. to bear arms.
I was being somewhat flippant to be honest but this example does show how the police can face a violent response from suspects (even what turn out to be innocent ones) which is something they have to account for in their approach, even if it isn’t something that happens every time. Note that I wasn’t saying people should have guns, only that because they can (and often do), the police have to take account of that when attending incidents and apprehending suspects.

I also don't see the possibility of danger existing in any given location as justifying police acting like invading soldiers. It did not used to be this way and it's not like violent crime is new to America. In fact, it's been on a very large downward trend since the 60s. Things are much safer for cops - for all of us - if anything.
I honestly don’t know how shifts in police attitudes and behaviours have actually happened over the years there. It’s perfectly possible the development of this kind of approach actually coincides with reducing violent crime rates after all. Lots of people present their personal impression of how the police are but I’ve seen little concrete evidence. I do know that US police in the 60s were hardly perceived as angels and I also know that the range and extent of reporting has expanded massively, both media and personal, via social media and the like.

I’m certainly not defending any kind of extreme procedures by the police and it’s undeniable that there are plenty of examples of them taking things far too far (both individually and institutionally) but there is a balance to be found and I do think that will often have to include armed officers making aggressive entries like this when seeking potentially violent and dangerous suspects.

I also think there is a major flaw in the response to this which is focusing exclusively on the actions of the officers on the ground, who presumably had no idea they were at the wrong address and nothing about what went wrong to lead them to that wrong address in the first place. That to me suggests an element of wanting to use this example to support a predetermined conclusion (about violent policing) rather than an interest in addressing root causes.
 
Mississippi police who fatally shot man may have had wrong house, DA says - CNN.com

You attempt to serve a warrant for domestic assault in MS in the middle of the night. What could go wrong?
Brainless bullies with guns.

According to another source, the only other time the police had been to their home of 13 years was when they were robbed.
Sad way for his family to make millions.


no surprises here; police are Gods in the US ............... they can kill with impunity & they walk nearly every single time ............... the trend is sickening & repulsive ............
 
Back
Top Bottom