• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman Revisited

sear said:
"Robotic"?
Robotic because over the months I've repeated them, because so many have contested them I've had to clarify the record? That in your mind makes it "robotic"? If so, then by your definition the absurdities I'm refuting are equally robotic.

If by "puerile" you refer to the fact that it was a schoolboy, not an adult that Zimmerman shot dead that night, I agree.

If y "unsubstantiated" you question the homicide, the corpus delicti is at Trayvon Martin's grave.

Floor: spotless.

The replies in this post provided by "bub". View attachment 67218885
Click to expand...
More empty rhetoric without substance.
 
#702

"Without substance" other than to expose your substanceless dismissal.


#703

Based on what?

Dark-skinned U.S. citizens reportedly remain a minority.

You would have us believe that though light-skinned schoolboys strolling home from candy stores might have outnumbered the dark-skinned ones by 3 or 4 to one, that just by coincidence the one Z shot dead that night just happened to be dark-skinned?

How many dark-skinned supporters did Z have in the courtroom during his trial?
 
Salsassin said:
False. I was talking about arrest records, not convictions. Which sears opened up by bringing up Zimmerman's one arrest pre-Martin.
Click to expand...

:lol:

Still made my point...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom