• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The politics of jurisprudence

Celebrity

DP Veteran
Joined
May 13, 2016
Messages
5,257
Reaction score
761
Location
VT, USA
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
hks_graphic_570.jpg


What does the word "jurisprudence" mean? While the word comes from a prefix meaning "law" attached to a word meaning "knowledge," the second word has changed in meaning. Prudence may have once indicated sagacity, but it now also means cautious, or even careful. Maybe that is due to our judiciary traditionally being old lawyers, people with experience in studying and practicing law. Incidentally, my state has the oldest mandatory retirement age of 90. Some states never require retirement of a judge based on age.

Through novel analysis using data from the Martindale-Hubbell (a comprehensive directory of nearly a million lawyers, judges, and law professors) and from Bonica’s Database on Ideology, Money in Politics, and Elections (which scores all individuals and organizations making campaign contributions to state and federal candidates between 1979 and 2012), Sen and Bonica contend in a new working paper that they’re able to measure the politics of judges and attorneys, quantifying what had been known only anecdotally, if at all.

What they found is that there is a correlation between conservative political ideology and likelihood of being appointed as a judge, and that this polarization increases the higher up you go in the judicial system. The authors sought to establish a causal link as well, and that political organizations are actively seeking to polarize the judiciary.

I do not think that being appointed a judge makes one conservative or liberal, and I agree with the findings that conservatives are more often appointed. An imperfect analogy would be the higher rate of arrest of minorities per capita. The pool of attorneys from which an appointment is made is largely liberal. So a greater number of conservatives appointed should indicate conservative actors are influencing the confirmation process.
 
Back
Top Bottom