• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge urges new citizens to leave USA if can't accept Trump...

We are taking the country back from corrupt crony politicians like Hillary Clinton who have drove this country into the ground.

Look up Teneo holdings. Hillary could have used her money on helping middle America but her money went into what we call corruption.

(sigh)
All over the map. I can't follow someone who goes in three directions at once.
 
I wouldn't have phrased it the way this judge did. But I think he just meant to impress upon these new citizens that even if they dislike Mr. Trump, they have chosen this country and now have a duty to support it.
 
Freedom of speech is protected by the first amendment... would you applaud a judge who favors restricting gun sales to say "you're citizens now, but if you want a gun, I suggest you get back on the boat."

No? Then stop with the stupid clapping emojis.
 
The judge is exercising HIS 1st amendment rights.

By suggesting that the 1st Amendment rights of others be violated. Can yell "fire" in a crowded theater.
 
Your dismissal is typical and means 0.

Didn't dismiss anything. Pointed out that you should never call anyone a hypocrite based on your hypothesis. Doesn't surprise me that you missed that.
 
I agree with the judge's sentiments except for one point; he did it from his position of authority.
 
By suggesting that the 1st Amendment rights of others be violated. Can yell "fire" in a crowded theater.

Why not? BLM has screamed about killing police. You can't have it both ways.
 
Why not? BLM has screamed about killing police. You can't have it both ways.

Here is your error. When did I say that BLM saying that was OK? Here's a hint... I didn't. When you attempt to assign a position to someone, you really should make sure that the person actually holds that argument.
 
You know what I meant.

He might, problem is, this "shortcut" people commonly used is annoying, since removing the "when there is no fire" part completely changes the context of the situation.
 
Back
Top Bottom