• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Charlotte: Gun had his fingerprints fury over anti-white violence

Y'know the really ****ed up part of all this? It's that many of the same people who rail against private citizens owning guns are now questioning why the cops thought that Keith Scott, with a gun, was a danger to them. The ideological paradox with this stuff is mind boggling in its lunacy.
 
Lutherf said:
Y'know the really ****ed up part of all this? It's that many of the same people who rail against private citizens owning guns are now questioning why the cops thought that Keith Scott, with a gun, was a danger to them. The ideological paradox with this stuff is mind boggling in its lunacy.
Click to expand...

Yup,

and the lunacy that some say the gun was not pointed at the cops makes it OK.

then thinking I would support that lunacy because I also support the 2A.

One thing this has taught me though.....

If pulled over and I have my gun with me, (as I usually do) I will tell them I have it and where, but I damn sure am not going to reach back and get it.

I ain't touchin' it.

I refer everyone to my previously stated "Coiled Up Rattlesnake Theory ".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom