• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

An Inmate Died Of Thirst In A Jail Run By A Loudly Pro-Trump Sheriff

What does this have to do with trump NOthing? why are you being dishonest?

Only thing it has to do with Trump is that the sheriff is a huge Trump supporter. So much so that he even spoke at the RNC for him. Nothing dishonest about it. Article never claims that Trump is personally responsible.
 
Only thing it has to do with Trump is that the sheriff is a huge Trump supporter. So much so that he even spoke at the RNC for him. Nothing dishonest about it. Article never claims that Trump is personally responsible.

That the incident has nothing to do with trump?

Hillary Clinton Supporter Arrested For Assaulting Old Man | The Daily Caller

Hillary supporter beat up an old man. I guess Hillary supports beating up old people if they disagree with you.
here is your own logic at work.

Because it has nothing to do with trump like you want to make it seem.
Just as this story has nothing to do with Clinton, but hey if you want to play that game this person supports Clinton
so I guess Clinton supports beating up old people right.

lets see if you can stay consistent or if this is just another partisan hack post which we all know is the case.

if you were actually concerned for the prisoner you never would have mentioned trump as he has nothing to do with it.
 
Part 1
I'm never dishonest and of course I proved you wrong. Using your own images, in fact.
Proved me correct and you are constantly dishonest.

You're the one claiming I was outraged, when I clearly was not. Once again, you're using words whose meaning you seem to not understand. You really should stop that.
projection arguments get tiring from you come up with something else.
Nope, I jumped on Maggie for her assertion the most wrong thing of this situation was the Trump link. Big difference. If Maggie had said, "this is awful/ridiculous, but Trump doesn't have anything to do with it", I wouldn't have said anything and would have agreed. But that's not what she did.

She is correct trump doesn't have anything to do with this. so far she is right and you are wrong.
Again, don't use words whose whose meaning you don't understand.
projecting again.
I did. Three sentences, the first two of which were about the topic and expressed the strongest opinions. The third sentence was an aside of a partisan nature. I read it just fine. Have you read it yet?
Yep read what you wanted to and ignored the rest which sums up your MO pretty much dishonest. yep I read it the story has nothing to do with trump.

Ironic coming from a person who posted a picture of a textbook which clearly did not say it was a Common Core book from a company whose website clearly stated they align their textbooks to Common Core, thus proving you incredibly wrong.

Yep it did. it was printed in black and white you evidently didn't read it.

It did not say that, because Common Core is not curriculum. Once again, you are using words whose meanings you don't understand.

Book says otherwise thanks.
It said, and I quote, "A Common Core Curriculum". Those are the exact words on the book, I'm looking at it now. It did NOT say "Common core math book". You claiming it did is simply a lie.

yout just said it wasn't a curriculum but you just posted that it was. you prove you can't keep yourself straight in your arguments.

Just accept it.

Yep I accept facts. It was a common core math book based on the common core curriculum.

So your belief is that if I post in contradiction to someone, I'm outraged? Really? Well, then you need to stop your faux outrage in your response to me. Because you apparently are raging very hard, by your understanding of communication.
No outrage just calling out your inconsistent argument.

And I called her out for being more concerned about a useless partisan add-on than the fact a prisoner died of dehydration in prison.

Then you should be calling out the OP for posting the partisan add-on to begin with. so where is it at?

More untruths, as I have said multiple times Trump has nothing to do with this situation and his inclusion was needless. Why are you so insistent on saying things which are provably false?

Not untrue. I have yet to see you address the OP while addressing other people that are calling it for what it is. So I didn't say anything false

I already did, using her own words. :shrug:
because I say so isn't an argument or proof of anything.

Considering how often I absolutely demolish you in our discussions, you probably ought to re-evaluate your thinking the next time you decide to respond in opposition to me. It NEVER goes well for you.

yes you should this is very good advice for you to follow. I never does go well for you at all.

It's not a projection nor a strawman. It was literally Maggie's words. Go back and read if you don't believe me.

Actually it was and it is. You assume the argument being made and then you argue that assumption. that is by definition a strawman.
You should probably take your own advice.

Uhh, you replied to me, good sir. And I, in response, pointed out you seem more interested in Trump than the dead man also. I asked you if that's true. So is it? Which do you care more about, the dead man or the partisanship?


I already responded to this you should have read it but you only read what you want to read.
 
That the incident has nothing to do with trump?

Hillary Clinton Supporter Arrested For Assaulting Old Man | The Daily Caller

Hillary supporter beat up an old man. I guess Hillary supports beating up old people if they disagree with you.
here is your own logic at work.

Because it has nothing to do with trump like you want to make it seem.
Just as this story has nothing to do with Clinton, but hey if you want to play that game this person supports Clinton
so I guess Clinton supports beating up old people right.

lets see if you can stay consistent or if this is just another partisan hack post which we all know is the case.

if you were actually concerned for the prisoner you never would have mentioned trump as he has nothing to do with it.

That is correct. That is a Hillary supporter and that is a Trump supporter. Those are the facts. Now let me pose you with a question that I have asked several times here. Does this not show a contrast when Trump says he surrounds himself with the best people? Is this not a reflection of Trump? Remember how he brags all the time that he “surrounds himself with good people" and as President he is going to "to surround himself only with the best and most serious people"? This is someone he surrounds himself with? Someone who is in charge of housing prisoners in a way that ensures they do not die, but in fact it seems that his department he headed failed on that aspect. This is one of the "best people" Trump surrounds himself with?
 
That is correct. That is a Hillary supporter and that is a Trump supporter. Those are the facts. Now let me pose you with a question that I have asked several times here. Does this not show a contrast when Trump says he surrounds himself with the best people? Is this not a reflection of Trump? Remember how he brags all the time that he “surrounds himself with good people" and as President he is going to "to surround himself only with the best and most serious people"? This is someone he surrounds himself with? Someone who is in charge of housing prisoners in a way that ensures they do not die, but in fact it seems that his department he headed failed on that aspect. This is one of the "best people" Trump surrounds himself with?

Hillary surrounds herself with people that beat on the elderly wow that is horrible.
and she surrounds herself with people like that?

you must be disgusted by Hillary.
 
Proved me correct and you are constantly dishonest.
:lol:

Just no. I've proven you wrong many a time. This thread included. In fact, I'm about to do it again.

She is correct trump doesn't have anything to do with this. so far she is right and you are wrong.
See, once more I have to prove you wrong. I never said she was incorrect about the fact Trump has anything to do with this. In fact, I even said Trump has nothing to do with this. I said it to her and I've said it to you. And yet, you're STILL trying to claim I'm wrong about this, even though I'm agreeing with your particular position on this.

This is what I'm talking about when I say you don't care about facts or truth. You are literally not telling the truth. I cannot hold the same position as another and the other be right and I be wrong. That's not how logic works. So, for goodness sake, please stop posting things which are lies. It gets tiring having to constantly point them out.

Where Maggie and I disagree, and what I pointed out, is that the Trump link is not more important than the death of the inmate. Once more, you seem confused as to what is being discussed.

Yep read what you wanted to and ignored the rest
There was only three sentences. There was no more "the rest". There is literally nothing more to read in the OP. Why are you constantly not telling the truth?

yep I read it the story has nothing to do with trump.
And, again, as I have said numerous times, I agree. Trump has nothing to do with the man's death. I have told you this numerous times. It would help if you would try reading comprehension.

Yep it did.
....no, it doesn't. I linked to the picture. Why would you lie about something which can CLEARLY be seen? I simply don't understand the desire you seem to have to not post truths.

Book says otherwise thanks.
No, it doesn't. The book say it is A Common Core Curriculum, which means it is a curriculum aligned with Common Core. It is not THE Common Core curriculum, because no such thing exists, because Common Core is not curriculum. I've explained this many times. Stop posting lies.

yout just said it wasn't a curriculum but you just posted that it was. you prove you can't keep yourself straight in your arguments.
You obviously don't know what you're talking about. I'll say it again, even though I know you will refuse to comprehend.

Common Core is standards. Schools (and, in this case, textbooks) align curriculum to Common Core. That does NOT mean Common Core is curriculum and it CERTAINLY doesn't mean Common Core says students have to learn math a certain way. You are 100% wrong.

Yep I accept facts. It was a common core math book based on the common core curriculum.
100% wrong. As I've proven multiple times, by both the publisher website and the Common Core website.

No outrage just calling out your inconsistent argument.
It's not inconsistent at all. Once more, you are attempting to use words you don't understand.

Then you should be calling out the OP for posting the partisan add-on to begin with. so where is it at?
Why do I have to do that? I ignore quite a bit of partisan nonsense on this forum, yours included. But Maggie was prioritizing a Trump link OVER the death of an individual and that's what I responded to.

Not untrue.
Of course it is, I've said many times, including to you, that Trump has nothing to do with it. So why would you post an untruth?
I have yet to see you address the OP
AHHH! That's the problem. You don't actually read things you respond to. Got it.

So I didn't say anything false
Your ignorance of what I said doesn't make it any less untrue.

because I say so isn't an argument or proof of anything.
Which is why I used her words. Like I said. Do you think you'll ever be able to not post something which is false?

Actually it was and it is. You assume the argument being made and then you argue that assumption. that is by definition a strawman.
No...she LITERALLY said those words. It is in post 4. She said those words.

Once more you are using words you don't understand.

I already responded to this you should have read it but you only read what you want to read.
Another lie. No you didn't. I asked you point blank which is more important to you. Your answer included something about projection and maybe putting the sheriff on trial. But what you did NOT do is answer my question, which was which is more important. You didn't answer that at all. Try again.
 
Back
Top Bottom