• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Loretta Lynch falls under the Clintons’ corrupting influence

I don't disagree with most of what you said, but I don't think Obama had anything to do with the former President stalling his own departure and boarding that plane to talk about grandbabies and so on. Maybe he did, and if so, I hope inside sources will talk if guaranteed anonymity.

But for today, I think Bill Clinton, ever the opportunist, manufactured this "opportunity." She may be an experienced jurist, but I think Lynch naively allowed herself to, in a way, be "entrapped." And if this is so, I do feel sorry for her. The Clintons are masters at this crap.

???

Do you really think they talked about grandbabies and such?
 
No theatrics involve...only reality.

However, it has not escaped my notice that you cannot dispute my words...you can only attempt to minimize them.

Mycroft...using nonsense like, "...is not a crooked, lying scumbag like Hillary..." is theatrics. Like I said, grade-school level theatrics.
 
???

Do you really think they talked about grandbabies and such?

That's the claim.;) Bill Clinton just happened to be at the same airport at the same time, and because he and Lynch have been besties forever, he couldn't wait to just amble over to her plane just to say hey...as you do when you're a former President whose wife is under investigation and when you may be a key witness in investigation of the Clinton Foundation.
 
Mycroft...using nonsense like, "...is not a crooked, lying scumbag like Hillary..." is theatrics. Like I said, grade-school level theatrics.

As I said...not theatrics. Reality.

Look, if you don't agree with my take on reality then dispute it...instead of dismissing what I say.
 
That's the claim.;) Bill Clinton just happened to be at the same airport at the same time, and because he and Lynch have been besties forever, he couldn't wait to just amble over to her plane just to say hey...as you do when you're a former President whose wife is under investigation and when you may be a key witness in investigation of the Clinton Foundation.

Well, of course that's their claim but I don't know of anybody who actually believes their claim. That makes it irrelevant and we need to look for other issues. If you want to place all the blame for this idiocy on the Clintons, you are going to have to come up with something else.

For example, what's in it for the Cintons to sandbag the Obama administration?
 
As I said...not theatrics. Reality.

Look, if you don't agree with my take on reality then dispute it...instead of dismissing what I say.

Okay...I dispute it.
 
Well, of course that's their claim but I don't know of anybody who actually believes their claim. That makes it irrelevant and we need to look for other issues. If you want to place all the blame for this idiocy on the Clintons, you are going to have to come up with something else.

What Lynch should've done was politely order the former President off the plane, telling him that this spontaneous meeting was inappropriate.

But I do blame Bill Clinton for deliberately stalling so that he could engineer this "spontaneous" meeting and jam Lynch up. I have no idea what all his motives are beyond muddying the waters and tainting her, but I do blame him. He is the one who took the action, and whatever his nefarious purposes were, he knew exactly what he was doing.

And I'm willing to give Lynch the benefit of the doubt here. Do I think she's Obama's lackey? Yes, I do. Do I think she'll do a more honorable job than Eric Holder, who should never have been AG and who disgraced the Department of Justice, IMO? Doubtful, but remains to be seen. And none of that has anything to do with this. Until there is evidence that Lynch is somehow complicit in something here, I think she was taken advantage of.
 
What Lynch should've done was politely order the former President off the plane, telling him that this spontaneous meeting was inappropriate.

That is precisely what she should have done.

But she didn't.

Nobody died because she did not.

And the voting public can take what happened into consideration in November.

MY GUESS: They will elect Hillary Clinton to the presidency despite this incident.
 
My case?

I dispute it.

That is my case.

LOL!!

Figures...

You got nothing.

VERB
argue about (something); discuss heatedly:
"I disputed the charge on the bill" · [more]
synonyms: debate · discuss · exchange views · quarrel · argue

You are doing none of these things.
 
Mycroft...using nonsense like, "...is not a crooked, lying scumbag like Hillary..." is theatrics. Like I said, grade-school level theatrics.

As I said...not theatrics. Reality.

Look, if you don't agree with my take on reality then dispute it...instead of dismissing what I say.

Exactly correct. One just has to look at Hillary's long history of well established corruption, conflicts of interest at every turn, and scandals to see the reality. Just too bad that so many are either not aware of this history, or chose to ignore this history.

There is no dispute of Hillary's long history possible. It's a fact. It's just that some refuse to acknowledge and ignore, which is always dangerous, ignoring reality.
 
First, a comment on the topic of the thread:

All this hatred and anger is no good for you guys. Get over it.

Now:



LOL!!

Figures...

You got nothing.

VERB
argue about (something); discuss heatedly:
"I disputed the charge on the bill" · [more]
synonyms: debate · discuss · exchange views · quarrel · argue

You are doing none of these things.

Neither are you...but you do not realize it.
 
Exactly correct. One just has to look at Hillary's long history of well established corruption, conflicts of interest at every turn, and scandals to see the reality. Just too bad that so many are either not aware of this history, or chose to ignore this history.

There is no dispute of Hillary's long history possible. It's a fact. It's just that some refuse to acknowledge and ignore, which is always dangerous, ignoring reality.

Get over the anger and hatred, Eo. Your demons will be your undoing.
 
First, a comment on the topic of the thread:

All this hatred and anger is no good for you guys. Get over it.

???

Anger and hatred are the topic of this thread?

Are you saying the Clintons are angry at and hate Lynch? Perhaps you'd like to explain that?

Now:





Neither are you...but you do not realize it.

Neither am I what? Anything I've disputed has been done with supporting reasoning.


(You know, Frank, you are becoming more and more like imyoda everyday. Are you sure that's what you want?)
 
???

Anger and hatred are the topic of this thread?

Are you saying the Clintons are angry at and hate Lynch? Perhaps you'd like to explain that?

Read the title of the thread...and if you cannot see it is born of anger and hatred...you are being purposefully blind.



Neither am I what? Anything I've disputed has been done with supporting reasoning.

You post words...not actual arguments, Mycroft.

What you want is for people to bicker with you.

Good luck with that.

(You know, Frank, you are becoming more and more like imyoda everyday. Are you sure that's what you want?)

I am me...and I am happy with what I am. If you would prefer not to discuss things with me...don't.
 
Get over the anger and hatred, Eo. Your demons will be your undoing.

It really not anger or hatred, it's more concern as to how much more damage to the nation Hillary's corruption cause once she's in the White House. This is a legitimate and well founded concern, in spite your blindness to it's mere existence.

???

Anger and hatred are the topic of this thread?

Are you saying the Clintons are angry at and hate Lynch? Perhaps you'd like to explain that?



Neither am I what? Anything I've disputed has been done with supporting reasoning.


(You know, Frank, you are becoming more and more like imyoda everyday. Are you sure that's what you want?)

Agreed.
 
Last edited:
Read the title of the thread...and if you cannot see it is born of anger and hatred...you are being purposefully blind.





You post words...not actual arguments, Mycroft.

Oh that's rich coming from you. Someone who refuses to substantiate their position / opinion, and appears to be only parroting affirmations.

What you want is for people to bicker with you.

Good luck with that.



I am me...and I am happy with what I am. If you would prefer not to discuss things with me...don't.
 
Read the title of the thread...and if you cannot see it is born of anger and hatred...you are being purposefully blind.





You post words...not actual arguments, Mycroft.

What you want is for people to bicker with you.

Good luck with that.



I am me...and I am happy with what I am. If you would prefer not to discuss things with me...don't.

The thread title? You mean the one that says something against Clinton? LOL!! Yeah, Frank...boogie men abound, don't they?

Actually, what I want are people to engage me in relevant discussion. You rarely provide that.
 
Hillary has cooperated throughout this entire sordid political farce the entire time. I seriously doubt a republican could endure what she's had to endure from political enemies for the last five years. That alone gives her extra points, imo.

How is lying to investigators cooperating?
 
Better yet, it should be illegal for congress to use tax funding for their political hackery and witch hunts. I mean, there should at least be some credible evidence of wrong doing BEFORE holding hearings...because without any evidence... congress is in blatant violation of the fifth and fourteenth amendments.

They have a ton of evidence to hang her what are you talking about?
This is the fib investigating the top has nothing to do with this
 
It really not anger or hatred, it's more concern as to how much more damage to the nation Hillary's corruption cause once she's in the White House. This is a legitimate and well founded concern, in spite your blindness to it's mere existence.



Agreed.

You may want to kid yourself into thinking that, Eo...but I see it as anger and hatred. And I have seen it as that for decades now.

Do it.

I think she will prove to be a fine president.
 
Oh that's rich coming from you. Someone who refuses to substantiate their position / opinion, and appears to be only parroting affirmations.

It is my opinion that Loretta Lynch is her own woman...not a pawn of Barack Obama or either of the Clintons.

Deal with that.
 
The thread title? You mean the one that says something against Clinton? LOL!! Yeah, Frank...boogie men abound, don't they?

Actually, what I want are people to engage me in relevant discussion. You rarely provide that.

Then why are you here engaging in discussion with me so often?
 
Back
Top Bottom