• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

American Democracy, ballots for bullets

Do you believe that US policy in Latin America is hypocritical and double standards?

  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1
  • Poll closed .

stan1990

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 15, 2018
Messages
875
Reaction score
59
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
In 1954, American president Dwight D. Eisenhower approved operation Pbsuccess which aimed to depose the democratically elected Guatemalan President Jacobo Árbenz. American mainstream media accused Árbenz of communism because of his land reforms that granted unutilized land owned by United fruit company to landless peasants. It was a common practice of international agricultural corporations to acquire large tracts of land in poor Latin America and Africa countries and keep them unused to retain high prices. Carlos Castillo Armas established into power by the means of military coup supported by the U.S government. He reverses the social policies of his predecessors, imprisons and torture the political opposition and banned the opposition party. After Armas assassination 1957, Guatemala suffer 40-year civil war until a peace treaty was signed in 1996.

Nicaragua, another country in Latin America had fallen to chaos and political instability. Mainstream media promoted a new civil war in the country that suffer almost 30 years of blood and death. The Independent published "Nicaragua closer to new civil war than ever before, judge warns." The current president, Daniel Ortega, was a prominent member of the Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN). The FSLN fought guerrilla warfare(1978-1979) against the military junta supported by the U.S and then another war against the Contra(1981-1990). An election was held in 1984. It was described by the international community as free and fair compared to the elections in El-Salvador or Guatemala. The Nicaraguan government didn't kidnap opposition members or mutilate them. There was a spurt in opposition parties, and union organization, freedom of speech and assembly wasn't ruled out by the state of terror. Oxfam complements the Nicaraguan government for their efforts.

El-Salvador and Guatemala are a different case from Nicaragua because they are U.S client states. Mainstream media view the situation there from a different corner. Elections taking place in friendly client states received positive coverage from mainstream media, while elections in enemy states viewed in unfavoured light. The United States believed that it isn't obliged to apply the same standards to a country their government hostile to American interests. The conflict in El-Salvador and Guatemala was internal. However, Nicaragua was subjected to external incursion by the U.S sponsored and supported Contra. In El-Salvador, the election took place under extreme oppression, the free speech and assembly were suspended during 1980. In Guatemala, over 80 members of the judiciary system including lawyers and judges were murdered in early 1980. Freedom of the press deteriorated in El-Salvador as authorities closed two opposition newspapers, La Crónica del Pueblo and El Independiente, in 1980 and 1981. No free election can be held under such circumstances of extreme oppression.

In Nicaragua, registration to participate in the election was obligatory. However, voting wasn't. In El-Salvador 1982 and 1984 election, voting was mandatory by law. Failure to vote can be translated to monetary penalties. At the time of voting, ID card stamped to acknowledge the casting of vote. Anybody stopped by the police or army checkpoint or patrol must represent his ID, which indicates that the individual carried on his patriotic duty. Before the 1982 election, government officials in interviews with different newspapers described failing to vote as an act of treason.

The attempts of the United States and other colonial powers to intervene in the affairs of sovereign and independent states all over the world will not cease. Media that become experts in deception and practicing double standards supports government positions for political and financial reasons. The practice of dual standards is normalized by media propaganda. countries such as Guatemala, Nicaragua and El Salvador are not the first victims of American intervention in Latin American affairs, and won't be the last. American intervention in the affairs of countries such as Cuba, Nicaragua and El Salvador included assassination attempt, coup d'état, death squads, election fraud and violation of the sovereignty of those States, directly or indirectly. The slogan "Ballots for the Lead" was a reality during that period in Latin America where the people were forced to participate in elections aimed at providing a legal cover for pro-US but unpopular regimes.

End
 
Just think...way back in the 50s-80s, you COULD have had the Soviets calling the shots. Then you would have had the bullets without the ballots.

Me? I prefer the current state of affairs...those Latin American countries make their own decisions. The US won't interfere unless those decisions adversely impact us. Them we'll make you a deal you can't refuse.

You be nice to us, we'll be nice to you...and we can all go about our own business.
 
Just think...way back in the 50s-80s, you COULD have had the Soviets calling the shots. Then you would have had the bullets without the ballots.

Me? I prefer the current state of affairs...those Latin American countries make their own decisions. The US won't interfere unless those decisions adversely impact us. Them we'll make you a deal you can't refuse.

You be nice to us, we'll be nice to you...and we can all go about our own business.

I don't think corporation and elite politicians agree with you. American interests don't care about being nice to others, but they get angry when others aren't nice to them.
 
I don't think corporation and elite politicians agree with you. American interests don't care about being nice to others, but they get angry when others aren't nice to them.

And that's why those corporations and elite politicians are angry at Trump. Fortunately, they aren't setting US policy anymore.
 
And that's why those corporations and elite politicians are angry at Trump. Fortunately, they aren't setting US policy anymore.

Mycroft:

The political elites and the concentrations of capital/corporations are still calling the shots in Mr. Trump's America. Trump has been repeatedly out-manoeuvred, sidelined or simply distracted into ineffectiveness by those around him. He is a hiccup not a game-changer and where he has had some successes it has been because he has been serving those elites and their interests at the expense of average Americans, including his base. Unfortunately his base is too desperate, too blind, too committed to a bizarre cult of personality or just too stupid to see that President Trump is hurting their interests rather than helping them.

As for Democracy in America, it is a sham in the 21st Century. The major political parties control the nomination processes at all levels so Tweedism is removing any real choice from the electorate, who can only vote for the candidates which the parties have selected for them. Money and political influence have further neutralised the representative democracy of the Republic by making elected officials more beholden to their donors and political backers than to the people who voted them into office. The police are militarising along with a myriad of other law enforcement agencies and both private and state domestic surveillance is increasing at an asymptotic rate in order to stop bullets from ever replacing ballots in a Second American Revolution. The Status Quo is very secure and President Trump will not change a thing for very long. That so many believe he can is absurd and myopic wishful thinking.

The only way out of this political Gordian Knot is to break the Two-Party System and for American grass-roots political movements to throw both parties out on their arses in a political revolution. Then and only then can the electoral, nomination, and political financing reforms be made to restore effective democracy back to the hands of the American electorate. "We the people" must rise and vote for a Second American Revolution because if you fight for it by force this time you will be crushed. Vote all the incumbent bastards and their corrupt and entrenched parties out and start afresh.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.
 
And that's why those corporations and elite politicians are angry at Trump. Fortunately, they aren't setting US policy anymore.

I disagree with you. They are still in the business of practicing power and influence. Trump or any other president after him won't be able to change this fact.
 
I disagree with you. They are still in the business of practicing power and influence. Trump or any other president after him won't be able to change this fact.

Oh, for sure, they haven't given up. They have too many Congressmen in their pockets. But Congressmen don't set US policy. The President does.

Regarding presidents after Trump, well...I have no doubt those presidents will try to regress back to control by the globalists. I don't see anyone else who opposes the globalists like Trump does.
 
Another failed poll I see....

So what? Not all polls failed. In addition, i write a threads expressing solid views that people can read and reply. Not like you, all what you do is posting polls on behalf of your operators.
 
Do you have any idea what are you talking about?

A cowardly non answer.

So what? Not all polls failed. In addition, i write a threads expressing solid views that people can read and reply. Not like you, all what you do is posting polls on behalf of your operators.

Who are these operators?
 
A cowardly non answer.



Who are these operators?

You know them better. They are the ones paying you to post polls and test the public opinion posting twitter or social media links.
 
Back
Top Bottom