- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
- Messages
- 94,329
- Reaction score
- 82,718
- Location
- Barsoom
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Cutting Aid to the Northern Triangle Illustrates the Gap Between U.S. Strategy and Capacity in the Region | Small Wars Journal
Terminating US aid to the Northern Triangle countries (Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras) is both a strategic and a tactical mistake that will only serve to increase the flow of migrants north to the US border and asylum requests. Then again, it is in Donald Trumps political interests now that he is in full campaign mode for 2020, to ensure that chaos reigns on the southern US border. One of his favorite tactics is to create or exacerbate a problem, and then crow to his base that his response is 'Trump protecting America'.
In late March, the United States unexpectedly decided to cut foreign assistance to the Northern Triangle countries of El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. The move caught some U.S. policy makers, diplomats, and defense officials by surprise as the countries have combined to receive over $4 billion dollars in U.S. foreign aid from 2009-2019, according to the U.S. Agency for International Development. Details about the withdrawal of U.S. aid remain unclear but it appears the U.S. decision to significantly reduce aid to these countries is unlikely to be reversed. The U.S. decision to dramatically cut foreign aid to these countries is worrisome for numerous reasons, least of all these: From a policy perspective it makes little sense as the destructive dynamic plaguing these countries to include soaring violence levels, pervasive criminality, drug and human trafficking, corruption, poverty, unemployment, and the proliferation of gangs and transnational criminal networks (TCNs) stand only to further deteriorate and worsen with the withdrawal of U.S. foreign aid and assistance. These negatives almost certainly will drive more U.S.-bound migrants north in search of more robust economic, and financial opportunities and a better quality-of-life. The move further illustrates how U.S. national security and defense policies are out of sync and as a result are unlikely to achieve U.S. strategic national security objectives.
President Trump’s 2017 National Security Strategy states “the United States must devote greater resources to dismantle transnational criminal organizations (TCOs) and their subsidiary networks… Every day they deliver drugs to American communities, full gang violence, and engage in cyber-crime… The United States must retain a ready force that is capable of protecting the homeland while defending U.S. interests”. If Washington is serious about dismantling TCOs and disrupting cocaine trafficking into the United States it must prioritize more assets to support Admiral Faller’s efforts so that his command is better resourced to interdict and reduce the flow of dangerous, illicit drugs from entering the United States. If not, Washington should lower its expectations and rethink its regional objectives as the withdrawal of U.S. aid to Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador diminishes U.S. regional leverage and leaves many U.S.-declared goals like dismantling transnational criminal networks no longer viable.
Terminating US aid to the Northern Triangle countries (Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras) is both a strategic and a tactical mistake that will only serve to increase the flow of migrants north to the US border and asylum requests. Then again, it is in Donald Trumps political interests now that he is in full campaign mode for 2020, to ensure that chaos reigns on the southern US border. One of his favorite tactics is to create or exacerbate a problem, and then crow to his base that his response is 'Trump protecting America'.