And you are still pushing age old zionist bull**** propaganda.
His country was under the control of the British Empire and he wanted to be free of them. He sided with the Nazi scum to do so, because of the enemy of my enemy is my friend theory. The Ukrainians, Baltic Nations, Fins, people in Burma, Malaya, Indonesia and many other places did the exact same to fight their colonial masters or Soviets. The Vietnamese welcomed the Japanese because it got rid of the French.. that it did not work out as they thought it would is another matter. This was happening all over the colonial world.
Now was the uncontrolled Jewish immigration to the area a problem? yes, not necessarily because they were Jews, but because they were foreigners. Muslims and Jews had lived in peace and intermarried for centuries under Ottoman rule and before, but as soon as the British came around the whole thing started falling apart because that is what the British and French did.. divided people based on religion and ethnicity. Much the problems in the area today, can be attributed to the British and French rule after the Ottoman empire... things like the Lebanese civil war and even the current Syrian civil war. And allowing in outsiders to settle in your area without your consent because the "rulers" saw you as sub-humans who should have no say in who was allowed in, tends to garner up revolutionary thoughts.
I aint defending the guy on his beliefs or views, but no way in hell should the Palestinian or general colonial wish for freedom from the largely pro Christian racist British and French Empires be relegated to a footnote just because there were Jews involved.
When the Japanese took the Philippines, many saw them as saviours from American oppression. That attitude changed of course, but it still happened.