- Joined
- May 30, 2017
- Messages
- 10,419
- Reaction score
- 8,034
- Location
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
The International Criminal Court in The Hague (ICC) will soon be under attack by the US Government if the ICC dares to investigate or prosecute Americans or American allies for war crimes or crimes against humanity.
I have posted this thread in the I/P Forum because in the same speech in which John Bolton threatened the ICC he also discussed the Palestinian attempts to have Israel prosecuted for war crimes by the ICC and that will no doubt bleed into the discussion of this topic, despite my earnest hope that we stick to the international dimensions of this topic on criminalising the ICC.
I wish to discuss John Bolton's and the US Administration's threatened travel bans, economic sanctions and US criminal prosecutions for ICC judges, jurists and prosecutors who investigate or prosecute US or US allies for war crimes as well as any person, firm, organisation or state which aids the court (including witnesses). Mr. Bolton also threatened to extend the use of these legal tools to these third-party persons, firms, organisations and states supporting ICC judges and prosecutors in both investigations and prosecutions. Worse still Mr. Bolton threatened that the US Government would use "any and all means" to prevent US citizens and allies from being prosecuted by the ICC. What does "any and all means" mean to the US Government? Will such means include actions as strong as covert military or intelligence agency action or overt military action?
The verbatim text of John Bolton's speech to the Federalist Society (as reported by Al Jazeera English) where he laid out this new and astonishing policy on Monday, September 10th, 2018 is linked to here:
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018...peech-federalist-society-180910172828633.html
It would seem that the United States of America has decided to go to near-war with the international legal system and anybody who tries to apply international law to Americans or to their close allies with respect to war crimes and crimes against humanity allegedly committed as part of US or allied state policy is in for a great deal of trouble. Even simply investigating such accusations of alleged war crimes/crimes against humanity can now apparently lead to criminal prosecution by American authorities for ICC jurists, investigators and cooperating third-parties. Is this a wise course of action by the US? Is it setting back by decades the development of international law and the international system? Is American exceptionalism now going to be legally and forcefully imposed upon the international legal system? Should investigators and judges be sanctioned and prosecuted for investigating and prosecuting alleged crimes by Americans or American allies? This is truly extraordinary and draconian behaviour in my opinion.
Please remember this is the I/P forum and martial law rules apply.
Cheers.
Evilroddy.
I have posted this thread in the I/P Forum because in the same speech in which John Bolton threatened the ICC he also discussed the Palestinian attempts to have Israel prosecuted for war crimes by the ICC and that will no doubt bleed into the discussion of this topic, despite my earnest hope that we stick to the international dimensions of this topic on criminalising the ICC.
I wish to discuss John Bolton's and the US Administration's threatened travel bans, economic sanctions and US criminal prosecutions for ICC judges, jurists and prosecutors who investigate or prosecute US or US allies for war crimes as well as any person, firm, organisation or state which aids the court (including witnesses). Mr. Bolton also threatened to extend the use of these legal tools to these third-party persons, firms, organisations and states supporting ICC judges and prosecutors in both investigations and prosecutions. Worse still Mr. Bolton threatened that the US Government would use "any and all means" to prevent US citizens and allies from being prosecuted by the ICC. What does "any and all means" mean to the US Government? Will such means include actions as strong as covert military or intelligence agency action or overt military action?
The verbatim text of John Bolton's speech to the Federalist Society (as reported by Al Jazeera English) where he laid out this new and astonishing policy on Monday, September 10th, 2018 is linked to here:
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018...peech-federalist-society-180910172828633.html
It would seem that the United States of America has decided to go to near-war with the international legal system and anybody who tries to apply international law to Americans or to their close allies with respect to war crimes and crimes against humanity allegedly committed as part of US or allied state policy is in for a great deal of trouble. Even simply investigating such accusations of alleged war crimes/crimes against humanity can now apparently lead to criminal prosecution by American authorities for ICC jurists, investigators and cooperating third-parties. Is this a wise course of action by the US? Is it setting back by decades the development of international law and the international system? Is American exceptionalism now going to be legally and forcefully imposed upon the international legal system? Should investigators and judges be sanctioned and prosecuted for investigating and prosecuting alleged crimes by Americans or American allies? This is truly extraordinary and draconian behaviour in my opinion.
Please remember this is the I/P forum and martial law rules apply.
Cheers.
Evilroddy.