The quoted bit is only relevant to the US where Clinton provided a good target. The post fact people who voted Brexit believed lies about £350,000 currently paid to the EU would be spent on our universal healthcare. Soon as the vote was won, the Brexit camp rowed back on many of the lies they sold to the public.
WRT that, I see Ms Clinton is not going to be prosecuted so really, you don't need any "article" to see that people don't really care about facts and are more interested in campaign rhetoric and hyperbole. I don't expect that to satisfy you as I suspect you may already have views that you simply wish to see reiterated by your favourite news sources.
Oh, contrary to what you want us to believe, I think you are reading articles that confirm your own bias.
Though it is hardly my area of expertise, I rather doubt that the L350,000, which seems a piddling amount to say the least, was the reason people did or did not vote to exit the EU. People worldwide are getting fed up with the cumulative lies of centralized government types, not just in the EU, and with their political corporate media right arms trying to load us all up with their lies... or of consciously omitting to give us the truth. Constantly.
I try to get a smattering of news sources, but will admit that, having been indoctrinated leftward at university and afterward growing more conscious in the real world, I have tended towards those more often telling me what I perceive as the real truth rather than the ones, almost all mainstream media here in the states, who are almost always lying, or omitting the story or proper details of the story, on especially the most important topics.
I can specifically remember being put up in a nice hotel with cable showing CSPAN in Palm Beach by the Trust Company I was working at the time. The company was transferring me from Sarasota, West Coast Florida, over to the East Coast. At the time the Iran Contra hearings were going on and, as I hadn't many contacts in the area and time on my hands, I watched with fascination for hours those hearings over several days. CSPAN had cameras on but no commentary. But I would read the next day in the hotel provided Palm Beach Post the national news accounts of what had gone on the day proceeding... and I am like, where are they getting this stuff? It is then that I began paying a lot closer attention to what the news folks were trying to tell me/sell me and, though it took a considerable amount of time, I simply went cold turkey, quit watching any TV at all, cut my cable in 2004.
Now I search online and whatever the search engine, and I vary using a couple, brings up, I try to pick a couple, say one from CNN, another from NBC or Fox or WSJ or Forbes or BBC or whatever, read them to get a feel for the truth and which ones I feel are feeding me a line of bull.
Its like panning for gold, sometimes you strike it rich, other times it is a ton of fools gold. In the recent election I could most certainly get a feel that the media in the US was getting almost desperate, was lying about the supposed almost certain Clinton victory that was upon us. A news and political junkie of sorts, having degrees in History and Political Science, putting as many of the factors eclectically together, I got the distinct impression that the media and Clinton were truly getting frantic and so felt Trump must have them really scared... and how could that be with all the polls saying almost the exact opposite. Similar to Brexit, and ultimate being so wrong.
Brexit taught us many things, a watershed that was a kind of inspirational rebuke of the left and its penchant for wanting us all to just fall in line. People, deep down as well as on the surface, messy or not like to control their own lives, doesn't the left get that yet?
