There's nothing " solid " and/or " moral " about supporting the subjugation of an entire people for the crimes of the few.
There's nothing " moral " in supporting a half century of systematic violations of the rights of an entire people
I fully agree. However of course that's not something he has supported anywhere, you have a reputation for engaging in at least one strawman argument in each of your comments.
I'm as human as the next and more humane than most including yourself
There is nothing " horrible " in seeing the reality of a situation
I wasn't making any claims regarding your humanity though and I am under no belief you are some kind of an alien.
Your positions are inhumane however for the reasons I have mentioned.
Of course it can be legitimate to murder someone in certain circumstances.
The right of self defence.
You simply show that your misunderstanding of what murder is and what self-defense is hasn't changed.
Murdering a person who is not threatening you, for being Jewish, is not self-defense and is indeed murder, that should be clear to anyone who is aware of the nature of our world and what such basic terms mean. It could never be legitimate or rational to just go out and murder people.
The right to kill those who are enforcing a military occupation
There is no such right, it's something you've made up so to allow yourself to grant legitimacy to such asinine acts. Contrary to your claims there is nothing that says a person is entitled to murder a soldier for enforcing an occupation. A person is only allowed to kill another in self-defense, if his life is threatened, Palestinians aren't dying because of that soldier enforcing an occupation to defend his people. Also, do take in mind that when talking about Palestinians murdering Jews we're also talking about civilians.
And if it were you yourself that were forced to live under a brutal and oppressive foreign military occupation you would be agreeing, wholeheartedly , with this concept
You forget that I'm not a Guardian reader who's only access to information about this occupation is empty propaganda, I, like Ido by the way, live here. I'm familiar with what the occupation does, as familiar as one can be.
I don't pretend it's easy to live under such occupation but I don't go out of my way to describe it as brutal and oppressive when it cannot be described as such; while no occupation can be 'humane' this one is still as humane as an occupation can be, humanitarian issues are addressed strongly more than in any other known similar case in history, and more importantly as I explained several times and you failed to address - it is a
just occupation, meaning it has a good reason for existing.
So long as you fail to address the security issues that the occupation exists due to and so long as you actually refer to those reasons - meaning the constant acts of cold blooded murder of Jews by Palestinians - as things that should be 'allowed' by Israel, then you fail at understanding even the very basics of the conflict or actually of human society, let alone the core issues.
People under foreign military occupation have the right , unsurprisingly , to resist it up to and including armed conflict. The targeting of civilians is , unsurprisingly , not legitimate whereas the targeting of soldiers/security, unsurprisingly is deemed to be legitimate
Well it's the first time you refer to the targeting of civilians which is mostly what is being discussed here. While to Israelis the targeting of both soldiers and civilians is the same, I agree that it isn't, at least legally speaking, but whenever one is discussing the subject of Palestinian acts of murder he is discussing the targeting of civilians as well, it's not something you can just put aside. That being said as I explained before the murder of soldiers who are not threatening anyone isn't something the Palestinians or anyone is entitled to, it's simply put cold blooded murder just like the murder of that British soldier, Lee Rigby I believe his name was, by those ISIS-inspired British immigrants was. People don't get to just walk up to 18 year old kid and murder him because he checks vehicles for bombs, it's nothing that should be 'allowed', that's the asinine position I've been calling out that you actually support, that makes it the moral obligation of anyone to oppose.
There was no Arab/Palestinian terrorism against Jews prior to the advent of Zionism
That's a 'don't wear short skirts - don't get raped' kind of argument, promoting such types of arguments reveals true immorality.