- Joined
- May 14, 2009
- Messages
- 24,641
- Reaction score
- 8,649
- Location
- Israel
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
No, I didn't " reject " anything.
I accurately stated that the creators of the Israeli state were recent immigrants to Palestine. It's a historical fact
I also stated , correctly , that many of the original Jewish community living in Palestine at that time were against the idea of a Jewish homeland there.
I also stated my opinion that I think it is crazy to kick a people off their land and out of their homes because your people lived there 3 thousand years ago but have resided in other countries for millennia since then
And as a long time supporter of the two state solution , which is the de facto support for the self determination of both sides in the conflict , your argument is an emotional and baseless response to the very real and verifiable argument I put up about your support for the lording over the Palestinians by Israelis
There was nothing real or 'verifiable' about your claims and you really need to learn to differ between a based argument and an empty claim. So far you've just made empty claims and whenever you were asked to provide anything of substance to back them up you have failed to do so, mostly you just ignore any calls to back your claims up and stick with them regardless and in this case it's the same.
You have indeed rejected the right of the Jewish people to self-determination in their homeland by making an argument against their very right to a national home there. Creating Israel didn't kick anyone out, there were several thousands of Palestinians who were either expelled, left because of the Arab leaders' orders or left by their own choice due to fear during the Israeli war of independence but that was after Israel was created and not the moment it came to be, there was no reason for that to happen had there was no attempt to annihilate Israel by the aggressors. The fact that 20% of Israel's population are Arabs alone makes assertions such as the one you're making quite illogical.
Furthermore it should be noted that you're saying "because Jews lived there 3,000 years ago" while in reality there were Jews living in the land of Israel throughout the last 3,000+ years, so there's a strong refusal to acknowledge the facts here on your side since that was already brought to your attention.
It's illegal under the 4th Geneva convention
Once again show where it says that a military occupation is a form of action that will always be considered illegal. You're really proving my point here by refusing to come up with anything of substance. Instead of simply dodging things you should look to accept the fact that you may be wrong and that the reason nothing actually supports your positions is because they are inaccurate at best and simply false most of the time.
Funny but these rabid antisemites also criticise and condemn the Palestinians who violate human rights and/or commit crimes. Not only that, the clue is in the name , they criticise many many countries around the world for their violations of human rights.
But the fact that they dare to criticise the Israeli Jews is obviously too much for someone like you.
These organizations are political, it's common knowledge, they have times when they try to be fair that's true, but most of the time they'll just focus on criticizing Western democracies, the US more than others and in regards to Israel like most far-left leaning organizations or individuals they too see it as the biggest 'enemy' and the largest target.
In an editorial published by The New York Times on Tuesday, Bernstein said that while the Middle East is populated by authoritarian regimes "with appalling human rights records," in recent years Human Rights Watch "has written far more condemnations of Israel for violations of international law than of any other country in the region."
Ynetnews News - Human Rights Watch founder says group biased against Israel
That doesn't alter what I stated one iota
Empty denial.
Last edited: