- Joined
- May 14, 2009
- Messages
- 24,628
- Reaction score
- 8,635
- Location
- Israel
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Comparing me to Islamic extremists is just the type of hyperpartisan thing I have come to expect from you, Apocalypse. Ideas can't be discussed in vacuo without someone like you showing up to display extreme and unreasonable criticism because you are personally offended. You can't talk about it without making it personal, every single time. Like telling me what I feel... that I'm enraged, when actually I have zero rage. And this discussion isn't about me.
So you can stop immaturely flaming me right now by calling me ridiculous or trying to ridicule me because it won't work. I see right through you. I'm here to discuss ideas not attack you or anyone. I am neither for nor against Israel nor for or against Palestine, I am against the ongoing violence just like a lot of observers. If my explorations of the topic offend you, that's none of my business. Keep your patronizing remarks to yourself.
And really, your reactions are endemic to this whole area of politics. Americans are virtually incapable of discussing this topic rationally. Any critique of Israel, any perceived slight, and you get compared to extremists. It's boring and typical.
Prophecy of rage doesn't require you to actually be enraged. I'm sorry if you're not familiar with the concept. Saying that you're doing what they're doing doesn't mean I compared you to them, merely that I pointed out how it's the same broken idea you're repeating here. You did promote a ridiculous idea so you only have yourself to blame for that, you simply claimed that a state's capital can become internationally governed just like that without the will of the nation controlling it.