foyrtgh
New member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2016
- Messages
- 25
- Reaction score
- 2
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
If the world did not intend to communicate to humans, why should it endow us with ability to comprehend? We might as well just have been like other animals without. But when able to comprehend, it is as necessary to use it as breathing.
People live and die, but the world goes on, perhaps the world uses us like enzymes to digest our experience as we live out this troubling existence. What do we comprehend?
So what is really politics? Is it just mind-puzzling for the bored? Or can it actually satisfy existence?
In the classic "Star Trek Voyager" the captain of the starship represents the total satisfaction for the crew; so when a political episode arises, satisfaction is not by natural involvement, but something communicated by the captain as answer to results - like it or not!
So does it really satisfy your existence to opinion in an international politic, or does it just satisfy your necessity to comprehend something puzzling even, when those puzzling objects are really fiction?
There are a particular difference between thoughts, some are logical, can be puzzled and trashed, but some are sort of liquid and even when defined irrational, won't just "go away". For example after a tragic experience there might appear after-thoughts of characters in mind, that troubles for some time. And that kind of "thoughts" usually also have more or less pleasant tunes.
For instance like comic movies where some characters are more attractive then others, because in the mind they are not just logic objects but tuned with something, that can be just as dangerous as to put wrong things in the mouth to eat!
People live and die, but the world goes on, perhaps the world uses us like enzymes to digest our experience as we live out this troubling existence. What do we comprehend?
So what is really politics? Is it just mind-puzzling for the bored? Or can it actually satisfy existence?
In the classic "Star Trek Voyager" the captain of the starship represents the total satisfaction for the crew; so when a political episode arises, satisfaction is not by natural involvement, but something communicated by the captain as answer to results - like it or not!
So does it really satisfy your existence to opinion in an international politic, or does it just satisfy your necessity to comprehend something puzzling even, when those puzzling objects are really fiction?
There are a particular difference between thoughts, some are logical, can be puzzled and trashed, but some are sort of liquid and even when defined irrational, won't just "go away". For example after a tragic experience there might appear after-thoughts of characters in mind, that troubles for some time. And that kind of "thoughts" usually also have more or less pleasant tunes.
For instance like comic movies where some characters are more attractive then others, because in the mind they are not just logic objects but tuned with something, that can be just as dangerous as to put wrong things in the mouth to eat!
