• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

First muslim mayor of londonistan

i suppose you can be that as well

But your comments are the small-minded remarks -- this guy has acted as legal defense for terrorists, including a guy imprisoned at Guantanamo. He's referred to moderate Muslims as "Uncle Toms".

He deliberately injected race into the campaign, calling for voters to rally against "racism" -- his way of rallying non-whites to his side. I'm not white - actually, my family comes from the same part of India that his comes from - but I think it's ridiculous for him to have stooped to racializing the campaign and then later complaining of others replying in kind.

More than a third of Londoners are foreign-born, and more than one-eighth are Muslims. Those numbers continue to rise. London is now BabyLon, and Brits will reap the consequences of building their Tower of Babel. The aftermath will be Londonistan.
 
OMG! Barely a day, and the hijab is compulsory! Even the Queen!

Ch2dnNCWkAEhSyb.jpg:large
 
But your comments are the small-minded remarks -- this guy has acted as legal defense for terrorists, including a guy imprisoned at Guantanamo. He's referred to moderate Muslims as "Uncle Toms".

He deliberately injected race into the campaign, calling for voters to rally against "racism" -- his way of rallying non-whites to his side. I'm not white - actually, my family comes from the same part of India that his comes from - but I think it's ridiculous for him to have stooped to racializing the campaign and then later complaining of others replying in kind.

More than a third of Londoners are foreign-born, and more than one-eighth are Muslims. Those numbers continue to rise. London is now BabyLon, and Brits will reap the consequences of building their Tower of Babel. The aftermath will be Londonistan.


well naturally the Muslims and foreigners will destroy the place
 
OMG! Barely a day, and the hijab is compulsory! Even the Queen!

Ch2dnNCWkAEhSyb.jpg:large

:lol:


TV shows for your viewing pleasure will be Koranation St, Middle East Enders and I'm a sharia-lebrity!
 
:lol:


TV shows for your viewing pleasure will be Koranation St, Middle East Enders and I'm a sharia-lebrity!

The Sunnah Shall Never Set On the British Empire
 
Sadiq Khan, a Muslim opposition lawmaker, is on course to be elected London's mayor on Thursday, loosening the ruling Conservatives' hold on Britain's financial center after a campaign marred by charges of anti-Semitism and extremism.

The fight to run the British capital has pitted the Labour Party's Khan, 45, the son of a bus driver who grew up in public housing, against Conservative Zac Goldsmith, 41, the elite-educated son of a billionaire financier.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/britains-labour-set-london-bitter-mayoral-campaign-101122139.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRnSnfiUI54
 

Ricardo was such a great actor!

"I shall leave you as you left me, marooned for all eternity at the centre of a dead empire..."

Time check: British India Mughal fall & rise of British Raj - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

Some reign and some get pillaged. I heard his acceptance speech and do hope he will be a mayor for all people, as he claims.

Because....................if Sharia Law takes precedence, the empire is lost!
 
The Sunnah Shall Never Set On the British Empire

Correct...and it hasn't yet. But w/o due diligence, and Conservatism, they will lose their asses to the cabal, because liberal dopes allowed it to happen!

Same for the USA.
 
I wonder if it's the fact that he's Muslim who supports SSM that creates the cognitive dissonance for them.

Gotta admit, when I read that about him, and that he was chairman of the Fabian Society, I figured he was about as Muslim as I'm Catholic.
 
Correct...and it hasn't yet. But w/o due diligence, and Conservatism, they will lose their asses to the cabal, because liberal dopes allowed it to happen!

Same for the USA.

More of the same from the right whinge. Liberals do, and conservatives complain about what liberals do.
 
IIRC, I read somewhere that Khan has a track record of always voting in favor of gay/LGBT rights and women rights.

If he really is a Muslim in anything but mere formality, he's certainly of the kind of Muslims we'd like to have here, and not among those who make trouble.


Reminds me of Cem Özdemir, chairman of the German Greens with Turkish roots: He's a perfect example for a 100% Westernized Muslim, including his showing up at gay pride parades, advocating the legalization of marihuana and, d'oh, supporting the hardcore-permissive Green platform well enough to win the votes of the party members.

If the largest share of Muslims in Europe were like him, there would exactly be zero point zero problem about anything at all.
 
Gotta admit, when I read that about him, and that he was chairman of the Fabian Society, I figured he was about as Muslim as I'm Catholic.

What is it about the Fabian society that you see as a contradiction?
 
IIRC, I read somewhere that Khan has a track record of always voting in favor of gay/LGBT rights and women rights.

If he really is a Muslim in anything but mere formality, he's certainly of the kind of Muslims we'd like to have here, and not among those who make trouble.


Reminds me of Cem Özdemir, chairman of the German Greens with Turkish roots: He's a perfect example for a 100% Westernized Muslim, including his showing up at gay pride parades, advocating the legalization of marihuana and, d'oh, supporting the hardcore-permissive Green platform well enough to win the votes of the party members.

If the largest share of Muslims in Europe were like him, there would exactly be zero point zero problem about anything at all.

You see, this is the problem I have with discussions like this: here we have a practicing Muslim, integrated and behaving in a way that all those anti-Muslim posters insist modern, westernised Muslims should behave, and what happens? A slip of the tongue, or a poor choice of words and apparently we're seeing behind the curtain at something dark and sinister. Is he really a crypto-fundy? Forget a career of service, a track record of fighting extremism or a history of working with colleagues across every social grouping. "He said 'Uncle Tom'! What a deplorable individual!" And apparently the PC language police is a phenomenon of the Left. Not round here it isn't.
 
What is it about the Fabian society that you see as a contradiction?

I just always thought of religious people as kind of conservative. I wouldn't expect a self-proclaimed Christian to belong to a socialist organisation, either.
Apparently I've been making a wrong assumption.
 
IIRC, I read somewhere that Khan has a track record of always voting in favor of gay/LGBT rights and women rights.

If he really is a Muslim in anything but mere formality, he's certainly of the kind of Muslims we'd like to have here, and not among those who make trouble.


Reminds me of Cem Özdemir, chairman of the German Greens with Turkish roots: He's a perfect example for a 100% Westernized Muslim, including his showing up at gay pride parades, advocating the legalization of marihuana and, d'oh, supporting the hardcore-permissive Green platform well enough to win the votes of the party members.

If the largest share of Muslims in Europe were like him, there would exactly be zero point zero problem about anything at all.

Big deal - as a cosmopolitan New Yorker, Trump is fine with gay marriage too. Whenever a WASP supports gay marriage, it hardly gets a yawn - but when a Muslim supports gay marriage, he gets treated like a superhero and given the key to the city.

Khan supports his Muslim ethnic community more than he supports LGBT rights. So the result will be that Muslim demographic and influence will grow in London, to the point where Muslims can discard Khan and overtly support those who are more representative of their Muslim beliefs. The result will be that LGBT rights will diminish after this phase-change in Muslim politics completes.

You think that you can use them as a stepping-stone to wider LGBT acceptance - but their intent is to use you as the stepping-stone to pave the way for themselves. They'll prevail instead of you, because they have the stronger demographics. You're just too naive to understand how things will play out.
 
British Buses Decorated With 'Glory To Allah' Ad...


And so it begins......the fall of the British Empire.

The lefty loons have ****ed themselves!
 
British Buses Decorated With 'Glory To Allah' Ad...


And so it begins......the fall of the British Empire.

The lefty loons have ****ed themselves!

We've also had ads saying 'There is probably no God'. Not a big deal.
 
Soon there will be no Britain. The independent Scots can point and laugh.
 
Nothing lasts forever. :shrug: Just one more step towards the ultimate goal of an independent Yorkshire within the EU. :cool:

See how much bargaining power that gives you with Paris or Berlin.
 
Big deal - as a cosmopolitan New Yorker, Trump is fine with gay marriage too. Whenever a WASP supports gay marriage, it hardly gets a yawn - but when a Muslim supports gay marriage, he gets treated like a superhero and given the key to the city.

Khan supports his Muslim ethnic community more than he supports LGBT rights. So the result will be that Muslim demographic and influence will grow in London, to the point where Muslims can discard Khan and overtly support those who are more representative of their Muslim beliefs. The result will be that LGBT rights will diminish after this phase-change in Muslim politics completes.

You think that you can use them as a stepping-stone to wider LGBT acceptance - but their intent is to use you as the stepping-stone to pave the way for themselves. They'll prevail instead of you, because they have the stronger demographics. You're just too naive to understand how things will play out.

What do you base your assumption on? Do you have any *facts* that support your speculation?

What makes you think Khan is really more Muslim than many Christians in Britain are Christians -- which means hardly, except formally?

I don't know Khan well enough to really know what kind of person he is. But when it's about Westernized Muslims like Özdemir in Germany, it's so friggin obvious that he's just a normal Westernized guy who just formally happens to be Muslim, but not pious in any way, who will *always* choose loyalty to his party platform over loyalty to other Muslims he politically disagrees with, any time of the day.

These "Muslims stick together" talk just becomes a conspiracy theory in cases like this. Some Muslims don't define their identity primarily by their religious affiliation; they're not any more "Muslim" than most secular Christians in Europe are "Christian" -- and many other defining factors have priority for them, religion being just one among many, as it should be.
 
Back
Top Bottom