• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

UN Name Israel Number One Violator of Womens Rights

I am not making a CLAIM. These are FACTS. Those are credible sources from NEWS ARTICLES. This is not something I'm just making up here.

And are you serious?! Blasphemy is not a trivial issue?! So are you saying you'd have someone EXECUTED simply for not agreeing with Islam? I really hope that that isn't what your saying.

If you don't wanna accept the evidence, then fine. Keep on believing that Saudi Arabia has done nothing wrong, and has committed no atrocities. Just keep on living in denial.

None of the articles you cited supported your claim that they execute the innocent. As far as has been presented here, that's just something you made up.

I'm not a Muslim, though I would certainly support a death penalty for blasphemy. Mocking the Almighty is about as far from trivial as you can get.
 
None of the articles you cited supported your claim that they execute the innocent. As far as has been presented here, that's just something you made up.

I'm not a Muslim, though I would certainly support a death penalty for blasphemy. Mocking the Almighty is about as far from trivial as you can get.

Why do you keep on bring up this 'innocence' argument? The fact that they kill people for simply disagreeing with the government is a clear fact that they have committed atrocities.

And that's horrible that you would support the death of a person simply for mocking Islam. That's just so s
wrong on so many levels.

And I'm done trying to convince you. If you want to continue to not address the evidence and keep remaining in denial, then be my guest. Ain't no skin off of my face.

And yeah, I just made all those links and articles up, too. What a joke.
 
Why do you keep on bring up this 'innocence' argument? The fact that they kill people for simply disagreeing with the government is a clear fact that they have committed atrocities.

And that's horrible that you would support the death of a person simply for mocking Islam. That's just so s
wrong on so many levels.

And I'm done trying to convince you. If you want to continue to not address the evidence and keep remaining in denial, then be my guest. Ain't no skin off of my face.

And yeah, I just made all those links and articles up, too. What a joke.

Again, just because you claim they've done something doesn't mean they actually have. Given that you just lied about what I wrote ten minutes ago, I don't put a lot of faith in your honesty.
 
Again, just because you claim they've done something doesn't mean they actually have. Given that you just lied about what I wrote ten minutes ago, I don't put a lot of faith in your honesty.
What did I "lie" about? Nothing.
 
Last edited:
What did I "lie" about? Nothing.

You claimed that I supported the death penalty for mocking Islam. Since I did not in fact say that, your claim was a lie.
 
You claimed that I supported the death penalty for mocking Islam. Since I did not in fact say that, your claim was a lie.
That is what you said in one of your previous posts, or you were simply being facetious.
 
That is what you said in one of your previous posts, or you were simply being facetious.

Again, you saying something doesn't make it true. Cite where I said that.
 
Again, you saying something doesn't make it true. Cite where I said that.
I'm done with you. Your obviously just a troll.

"I'm not a Muslim, though I would certainly support a death penalty for blasphemy."
 
Last edited:
I'm done with you. Your obviously just a troll.

"I'm not a Muslim, though I would certainly support a death penalty for blasphemy."

As with your earlier articles, you once again have cited something that doesn't say what you claim it does.
 
IWF - Outrage: U.N. Names Israel as Number One Violator of Women's Rights

In Saudi Arabia women can’t drive cars, can be flogged if they don’t wear traditional garb, receive half the inheritance of their brothers are not permitted to travel unless accompanied by a male relative. Clearly, you are thinking, Saudi Arabia must be a candidate for the worst country in the world for women. Not a bit of it. The United Nations has just named the worst nation for women’s rights. And which country might that be? Israel of course.

Countries the U. N. bypassed: Iran, where “adultery” (it is broadly defined) is a capital offense, as is fighting back against a male rapist, and Sudan, where domestic violence is legal, girls are often married off at the age of ten and genital mutilation is practiced on half the female population. Bayefsky points out that it is unlikely that the U.N. Commission on the Status of Women would name Iran for the richly deserved “worst for women” designation since Iran is an elected member of CSW. Sudan, where the president has been accused of genocide, is also not likely to be criticized by the CSW—Sudan is a CSW vice-chair.​

It is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore the sham the UN has become in recent decades. An ineffective "police" force, and highly corrupt (food for oil program, etc..), the folly of the UN suggests it should be removed from the US, and further US involvement should be looked at very closely.

What should replace it?

well they dont discriminate Against Palestinians by gender so ya this is bull ****
 
It boggles the mind that the USA is the biggest contributor of funds to this hateful, hypocritical, antisemitic organization.
The contradiction should open the eyes of American taxpayers. IE: Billions to help Israel protect itself yet billions to the UN! :roll:


Israel is the target of at least 77 UN Resolutions
and the Palestinians are the target of 1.
UN Resolutions Targeting Israel and Palestinians



Why the U.S. continues to waste its time and billions of taxpayer dollars on the U.N. remains a mystery.

America, we pay way too much for the United Nations | Fox News
 
A bigger violator than Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States? That's hard to believe.....
 
None of the articles you cited supported your claim that they execute the innocent. As far as has been presented here, that's just something you made up.

I'm not a Muslim, though I would certainly support a death penalty for blasphemy. Mocking the Almighty is about as far from trivial as you can get.

Wow, so insulting your imaginary dictator in the sky should get me hanged? People who believe that don't belong in the west.
 
Wow, so insulting your imaginary dictator in the sky should get me hanged? People who believe that don't belong in the west.

Not sure what you're babbling about, but blasphemy should definitely be a capital crime.

You get out. It was atheists and secularists like you who brought an end to the west's great golden age.
 
this was one of many actions and reports taken by the UN regarding the treatment of women
and notice below [the emphasis is added by me to show] that it is not jewish women who were found to be placed at risk by israel:
By a recorded vote of 20 in favour to 2 against (Israel, United States) with 11 abstentions, the Commission approved a draft resolution entitled, “Situation of and assistance to Palestinian women” (document E/CN.6/2016/L.3).
this is a legitimate world body objection to the treatment of Palestinian women by israel

read the report and you will find many other findings against other nation's practices that are harmful to women
japan's take is one that appears - to me - to hold sound perspective
The representative of Japan also expressed concern about the plight of the Palestinian women; however, he said his delegation had abstained in the vote as the resolution was not well-balanced.

Also speaking after the vote, the observer for the State of Palestine urged the international community and the Commission in particular to continue its efforts in support of the Palestinian people. The situation of Palestinian women and children had deteriorated to an alarming level as a result of the Israeli occupation and crimes committed by the regime. Those practices remained a major obstacle to the empowerment of Palestinian women, she said. Indeed, if Israel continued to attempt to silence Palestinian voices through its policies of oppression, discrimination and terror, those voices would only become louder and clearer.

those in this thread who decry the public outing of israel's actions detrimental to Palestinian women sound like puppets of the israeli spokesmodel, as follows:
Speaking on that item before the vote, the representative of Israel called the text an attack on his country and said it failed to hold the Palestinian leadership accountable, did nothing to help Palestinian women and only advanced the agenda of those who sought to use the Commission as a political platform. Year after year, the Commission singled out one country only, with not a word to say about countries where women were treated like second-class citizens, unable to drive or leave the house without their husband’s permission. He asked delegates to vote against the text and to commit themselves to ending an annual charade that endangered the Commission’s credibility by indulging the whim of one party.

here is the cite for the UN press release:
Concluding Session, Women?s Commission Agrees on Approach for Gender-Responsive Implementation of Sustainable Development Agenda | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases
 
I'm sorry what? more importantly, WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT? Are you honestly telling me that israel is less respectful of women than india whose culture treats women like 2nd class citizens or saudi arabia which bans women from driving or getting past a primary education? Or congo where rape is prevailent? The UN is too biased towards the liberals but I guess that's what you get when the rest of the west is more liberal than the US.
 
Back
Top Bottom