• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Group accusing US border patrol of water sabotage sees member arrested

mike2810 said:
Pretty much my opinion also.
I never understood people who support those who enter the US illegally.
Click to expand...

more than our own people.

Yeah its odd. I'm trying to understand why, I think its so people can prove how virtuous they are by pretending to be kind to their enemy.

Notice these assclowns that support invasion live in gated communities and don't offer a damned thing personally.

They want to be "generous" with stolen money. If that can be considered generous.
 
CLAX1911 said:
No. But if they wish to kill themselves I have no control over that.
Click to expand...

Yawn. More mealy-mouthed word games. You support more dead Mexicans at the border by actively supporting destruction of things that could save them.
Believe what you wish.
Click to expand...

I don't have to believe it; I know you're only fooling yourself.
You may not be. You are demonizing and presenting strawman fallacies.
Click to expand...

LOL! And now dishonesty. No, I've done neither, but please pretend that I have if it makes you more comfy.
lol Marxist? Ha ha ha ha ha sovereignty is not a Marxist view.

How ridiculous.
Click to expand...

As ridiculous as trying to label me a "regressive globalist", Comrade.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Yawn. More mealy-mouthed word games.
Click to expand...
Pathetic dodge.

You support more dead Mexicans at the border by actively supporting destruction of things that could save them.
Click to expand...
It is not our duty to save invaders.

I don't have to believe it; I know you're only fooling yourself.
Click to expand...
Who are you trying to convince?

LOL! And now dishonesty. No, I've done neither,
Click to expand...
Lying about demonizing and suggesting I'm dishonest? The irony is palpable.

As ridiculous as trying to label me a "regressive globalist", Comrade.
Click to expand...
You wish to welcome invaders with hospitality and suggest not doing so is wanting dead Mexicans at the boarder.

You think suggest sovereignty should be undermined.

I'm not against the border patrol capturing invaders and giving them water and food while escorting them to the deportrtation bus.

I am against seditious assholed making it easier and people who try to suggest boarder patrol doing their job is killing people.

You have done both of these. You support sedition and dispise not just our police but their job.

Suggesting you are a globalist makes sense. Suggesting sovereignty is a Marxist view is such a gross misuse of the word Marxist it boarders on wilful stupidity.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
I don't necessarily, but I don't support measures that makes their deaths more likely, either.
Click to expand...

giving them the means to traverse an obstical and suggesting police curtailing the organized attempt to subvert the law (crime) you are supporting illegal immigration.

If retards would rather die than turn themselves in, it isn't anybody killing them. You suggested it was.
 
CLAX1911 said:
Pathetic dodge.
Click to expand...

Indeed. That statement of yours that I replied to most certainly was. Mealy-mouthed, as well.
It is not our duty to save invaders.
Click to expand...

It's our duty to use correct terms. They are not invaders except to all but the most desperate to make an emotion-based argument. You, in this case.
Who are you trying to convince?
Click to expand...

No one. What an odd question.
Lying about demonizing and suggesting I'm dishonest? The irony is palpable.
Click to expand...

I haven't lied. In fact, in order to state that, you had to lie. Now THAT'S irony.
You wish to welcome invaders with hospitality and suggest not doing so is wanting dead Mexicans at the boarder.
Click to expand...

Where did I say that I welcome them? Yet more lies, I see. And you actively support destruction of things that could potentially save lives of people in danger. You support more dead Mexicans. It's really that simple.
You think suggest sovereignty should be undermined.
Click to expand...

No, I don't. You seem to have a real pathological dishonest issue.
I'm not against the border patrol capturing invaders and giving them water and food while escorting them to the deportrtation bus.

I am against seditious assholed making it easier and people who try to suggest boarder patrol doing their job is killing people.
Click to expand...

Again: you're for more dead Mexicans at the border. It really couldn't be more plain.
You have done both of these. You support sedition and dispise not just our police but their job.
Click to expand...

You just can't seem to stop lying. That would make any rational. adult reconsider their position usually. I fully support our police. Why is that so hard for Marxists like you to understand?
Suggesting you are a globalist makes sense. Suggesting sovereignty is a Marxist view is such a gross misuse of the word Marxist it boarders on wilful stupidity.
Click to expand...

LOL! Ju st[/quote]

Sorry you can't make a rational point and have to resort to such dishonest, comrade. Marxists like you can never help themselves when they've lost.
 
CLAX1911 said:
giving them the means to traverse an obstical and suggesting police curtailing the organized attempt to subvert the law (crime) you are supporting illegal immigration.

If retards would rather die than turn themselves in, it isn't anybody killing them. You suggested it was.
Click to expand...

Good of you to admit that you support more dead Mexicans on the border, comrade.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
And if they die?
Click to expand...

do you think people die crossing other countries borders around the world?

same here....maybe it should be deadlier

fewer people would try crossing....

we dont have an open border...we are a sovereign nation, and are allowed to protect our border against invaders

and yes that can include a family of 4 with 2 of them in diapers seeking a better life....

we dont have the resources to take in every refugee....or do you want to give up your spot and go to where they came from?
 
Tanngrisnir said:
I don't necessarily, but I don't support measures that makes their deaths more likely, either.
Click to expand...

Well how would the illegal alien know the water bottles were placed at that location. It is not like the Border Patrol blew up a well or natural spring.
Are you saying those crossing into the US illegally have an expectation of finding water and food placed out for them?

Using your logic, then heck the group might as well wait at the border and offer the illegals a ride. That would reduce the likely hood of a death by hiking through the desert.
 
mike2810 said:
Well how would the illegal alien know the water bottles were placed at that location. It is not like the Border Patrol blew up a well or natural spring.
Are you saying those crossing into the US illegally have an expectation of finding water and food placed out for them?
Click to expand...

No, that's not what I'm saying.[/quote]

Using your logic, then heck the group might as well wait at the border and offer the illegals a ride. That would reduce the likely hood of a death by hiking through the desert.[/QUOTE]

Again, no, that's not what I saying. You might want to be careful using the term 'logic'.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
No, that's not what I'm saying.
Click to expand...

Using your logic, then heck the group might as well wait at the border and offer the illegals a ride. That would reduce the likely hood of a death by hiking through the desert.[/QUOTE]

Again, no, that's not what I saying. You might want to be careful using the term 'logic'.[/QUOTE]

Then please clarify.
" I don't support measures that makes their deaths more likely, either."

My point stands.
 
mike2810 said:
Using your logic, then heck the group might as well wait at the border and offer the illegals a ride. That would reduce the likely hood of a death by hiking through the desert.
Click to expand...

Again, no, that's not what I saying. You might want to be careful using the term 'logic'.[/QUOTE]

Then please clarify.
" I don't support measures that makes their deaths more likely, either."

My point stands.[/QUOTE]

I'm not for encouraging people to come here illegally, but I'm also not against passive measures that would help survivability of very vulnerable people in desperate situations.

Offering them rides would be an active measure. It's not rationally comparable to simply putting water out there.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Indeed. That statement of yours that I replied to most certainly was. Mealy-mouthed, as well.

It's our duty to use correct terms. They are not invaders except to all but the most desperate to make an emotion-based argument. You, in this case.

No one. What an odd question.

I haven't lied. In fact, in order to state that, you had to lie. Now THAT'S irony.

Where did I say that I welcome them? Yet more lies, I see. And you actively support destruction of things that could potentially save lives of people in danger. You support more dead Mexicans. It's really that simple.

No, I don't. You seem to have a real pathological dishonest issue.

Again: you're for more dead Mexicans at the border. It really couldn't be more plain.

You just can't seem to stop lying. That would make any rational. adult reconsider their position usually. I fully support our police. Why is that so hard for Marxists like you to understand?

LOL! Ju st
Click to expand...

Sorry you can't make a rational point and have to resort to such dishonest, comrade. Marxists like you can never help themselves when they've lost.[/QUOTE]

I'm sorry you make personal attacks and strawman fallacies verses addressing my arguments.
 
mike2810 said:
Then please clarify.
" I don't support measures that makes their deaths more likely, either."

My point stands.
Click to expand...
Nobody believes anybody wants dead Mexicans at the border that is an appeal to emotion it's very common that's why they call you racist and bigoted homophobic if you don't agree with them.

It's an attempt to get you to defend yourself he completely abandoned the argument just to attack you.
 
CLAX1911 said:
Sorry you can't make a rational point and have to resort to such dishonest, comrade. Marxists like you can never help themselves when they've lost.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry you make personal attacks and strawman fallacies verses addressing my arguments.[/QUOTE]

I'm sorry you keep trying to use terms you don't understand and can only resort to rank dishonesty to try and win an argument, comrade.

Good luck with your magical thinking. You'll need it.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
I'm sorry you keep trying to use terms you don't understand and can only resort to rank dishonesty to try and win an argument, comrade.

Good luck with your magical thinking. You'll need it.
Click to expand...
Good luck with straw man fallacies. I don't fall for it but someone might.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom