Re: 'Undocumented Worker' Arrested for Two Homicides in Virginia
People like myself do not want a police state, we just want a state that would actually care about their own people, and not pay lip service to some pathetic liberal idea about so called Dreamer's coming in to live a happy life. Even immigrants who have waited upwards of 10 years to come into this country legally, think that being here illegally is a grievous offense to everything they strove to achieve. Its not the point of a police state, its the point of keeping you're own civilian population safe from individuals who pose an actual risk. If he/she is illegal, but possesses no criminal record or is found out under an event that did not cause them to have one. Then by all means give them a standardized citizen test, so he/she at least has a chance.
But if they are caught in the midst of a crime, or having committed a crime, and their immigration status is in question. They have to go, plane and simple.
Also-
when you cite a supreme court ruling, I understand what you are trying to get through in that message, and it does have precedence. But you and I both know that there have been multiple times in history, where knowledge of a supreme court ruling have meant squat. When levied against the decision of a judge or even a jury.
Hell, our legal system is nearly in shambles as it is.
Not to mention welfare is in the same mess, our school system is broken, and compounding the whole immigration reform issue is just more trash then anyone on here would care to dig through. Be them dem/rep/ind.. etc.
My main worry for this whole issue, is when they release said individual even when they were asked by ICE to hold onto him for processing and deportation. Then that person runs off to commit an even worse crime, possibly taking the life of more than one innocent civilian.
It is already the fault of a flawed system that failed to keep them out, but is it not also the fault of the people that refused to help get that person out of the country as well?
First and foremost, you have to understand something:
Regardless of what you think about me OR what some may say about me, my first default is my stance: I will not do anything that increases the size, power, and / or scope of government. Period. The government is not going to do anything that will benefit the citizenry (especially the posterity of the founding fathers) without charging a price, in terms of both dollars and lost Liberties, far greater than the promised benefit.
Those who have taken up the religion of immigration have played into the hands of the left. In every instance, the purveyors of the NEW WORLD ORDER / ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT have played the people who obsess over this issue. One example is the incessant B.S. over whether or not we are dealing with a crime or a civil issue. It's a civil issue and people here without papers are not criminals.
It is far easier to get rid of people in the U.S. without papers via the civil process. AND, with the right Attorney General, the taxpayers don't have to pay for the foreigners attorney. The next thing is that the issue is more about National Security rather than criminal acts. The proper remedy is, and always has been, to require Congress to declare a war if you really think we're being "
invaded."
Those are but a few; however, the bottom line -
NO B.S. deal is that I know what it's like, up close and personal, to be accused of a crime without the benefit of due process. I know what it's like to be there with your life on the line and I'll be damned if I let it ever happen to anyone else in this country without a fight - even if I'm defending my mortal enemy.
At a philosophical level, the government is under no duty to keep foreigners out. We should be a free market nation. I've given that example of how I had the Right to exercise my Liberties and go to a town in Tennessee. As an outsider, I was greeted by THEIR Rights... like the Right
NOT to offer me a job. And I remain convinced, if employers had the Right (as they do if we are governed by a government consistent with the Constitution) they would hire from within their community. Yeah, in some places the blacks would not get a job and the gays might get turned down here and there. Women, to some degree might feel the heat... BUT, there will always be places that
WILL give them a job.
We can't use that whole process of locking out our own via the pee test, blood test, hair sample, MVR check, credit check, criminal background check, firearms license, occupation license, driver's license (National ID / REAL ID Act Card / E Verify), proof of insurance, access to social media accounts, 24 / 7 / 365 womb to the tomb surveillance, drones in the sky, etc., etc. and then complain about people hiring foreign labor. We have to create incentives for the employers to hire Americans. Put America to work and you've solved your problem.
The personal comments and baiting need to stop.
