• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Isn't Communism as Hated as Nazism? Commies killed, enslaved, MUCH more and last much longer

Status
Not open for further replies.
Casca XV said:
After WW2, Leftist realized they needed to separate themselves from Fascism.
Click to expand...

Actually fascism is a far right ideology. Hope that helps. :)

So, they started the intense historical revisionist efforts. Because they control most of media and academia, and because most regular folks don’t pay much attention to these sorts of things, they have been mostly successful.

About the Nazis you are reciting are those historical revisions. About the USSR you are spewing Retardation.
Click to expand...

Hmmm, that sounds like an argument Trump would make in defense of his "very fine people", trying to help them by distracting and pointing fingers somewhere else. I suppose that's why they love him.
 
danielpalos said:
A high speed railway system would also improve "time to market" for Commerce.
Click to expand...

No it wouldn't, rail is good for bulk transportation like coal, aggregates, grain etc

But if you have a load of say fresh meat, fish, vegetables or eggs etc, you need a truck.


You won't find even the Chinese rail system transporting perishable goods.
 
Rich2018 said:
No it wouldn't, rail is good for bulk transportation like coal, aggregates, grain etc

But if you have a load of say fresh meat, fish, vegetables or eggs etc, you need a truck.


You won't find even the Chinese rail system transporting perishable goods.
Click to expand...

High speed rail can improve time to market. Refrigeration works with rail cars as well.
 
Fledermaus said:
That makes no sense.

I have been to Japan. Their high speed rail isn't for transportation of foods.

Why doesn't other nations use high speed rail like you imagine?
Click to expand...

You make no sense. Why wouldn't they use some refrigerated cars on their railways? Should they lose that potential business.
 
Fledermaus said:
That makes no sense.

I have been to Japan. Their high speed rail isn't for transportation of foods.

Why doesn't other nations use high speed rail like you imagine?
Click to expand...

danielpalos said:
You make no sense. Why wouldn't they use some refrigerated cars on their railways? Should they lose that potential business.
Click to expand...

Why doesn't any other nation use high speed rail like you imagine?
 
danielpalos said:
You imagine wrong? I have no idea why y'all only have problems instead of solutions in right wing fantasy.
Click to expand...

You can't seem to grasp the question.

Why doesn't any other nation use high speed rail like you imagine?

None do.

None.

High Speed Rail =/= Freight Train.
 
Fledermaus said:
You can't seem to grasp the question.

Why doesn't any other nation use high speed rail like you imagine?

None do.

None.

High Speed Rail =/= Freight Train.
Click to expand...

The context is upgrading our railroads to two-hundred-and-fifty miles per hour. You have to understand we have solutions not merely problems to be solved, on the left.
 
danielpalos said:
The context is upgrading our railroads to two-hundred-and-fifty miles per hour. You have to understand we have solutions not merely problems to be solved, on the left.
Click to expand...

That won't help with the transport of perishable goods.
 
danielpalos said:
High speed rail can improve time to market. Refrigeration works with rail cars as well.
Click to expand...

Not nearly enough.

Perishable goods are best transported by road.

I highly doubt that your much vaunted Chinese high speed rail network will transport much perishable goods.
 
Rich2018 said:
Not nearly enough.

Perishable goods are best transported by road.

I highly doubt that your much vaunted Chinese high speed rail network will transport much perishable goods.
Click to expand...

I agree to disagree. Upgrading infrastructure could enable refrigerated cars to move to and from processing facilities. No amount of trucking could beat that and without the congestion on public freeways.
 
danielpalos said:
I agree to disagree. Upgrading infrastructure could enable refrigerated cars to move to and from processing facilities. No amount of trucking could beat that and without the congestion on public freeways.
Click to expand...

If the rail system was otherwise unused and the processing plants had their own railway station perhaps.

But it isn't and they don't.

Eg: in the US, a supermarket warehouse is not built on the rail network and neither are the stores

I'd be willing to wager that the bulk of perishable goods are transported by rail in China.
And probably the bulk of factory made products.
 
Rich2018 said:
If the rail system was otherwise unused and the processing plants had their own railway station perhaps.

But it isn't and they don't.

Eg: in the US, a supermarket warehouse is not built on the rail network and neither are the stores

I'd be willing to wager that the bulk of perishable goods are transported by rail in China.
And probably the bulk of factory made products.
Click to expand...

Upgrading infrastructure can still provide returns to scale.
 
danielpalos said:
The context is upgrading our railroads to two-hundred-and-fifty miles per hour. You have to understand we have solutions not merely problems to be solved, on the left.
Click to expand...

California is trying to do that.

Have you not followed the failure of high speed rail?

And if built, no one is using it for transportation of foods.
 
danielpalos said:
eventually; what doesn't. in the mean time however, upgrading infrastructure could put train depots near redistribution depots.
Click to expand...

Why ?

Most, if not all, distribution deports are located at junctions in the road network.

Now if you say have a large chemical or agricultural depot, you may well locate in on the rail network.

The roads network links all warehouses and stores, the rail network doesn't and can never do.
 
Fledermaus said:
California is trying to do that.

Have you not followed the failure of high speed rail?

And if built, no one is using it for transportation of foods.
Click to expand...

Only in right wing problematic fantasy are there only problems and never any solutions. Passenger service is only the beginning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom