• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Historical revisionism

Masterhawk

DP Veteran
Joined
May 6, 2016
Messages
1,908
Reaction score
489
Location
Colorado
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
These days, revisionists are viewed as people who push a wrong view of history for the sake of a political agenda. However, that's not really what it'

Historical revisionists are people who challenge the mainstream view of a particular point in history. This isn't inherently bad. If new information contradicts the orthodox viewpoint, maybe that viewpoint should be revised. If you believe that the Soviet Union wasn't that bad, the American Civil War was about more than just slavery, or that the Gilded Age wasn't so bad because the economy was growing very fast and all the problems attributed to it weren't new, congratulations, you're a revisionist.

Granted, there are some forms of revisionism which are wrong such as Holocaust denial. However, revisionism itself isn't a bad thing, pseudohistory is. Pseudohistory can be done for several reasons. Sometimes, it's tied to a conspiracy theory such as the pyramids being built by aliens. It can also be done for political (and perhaps more than often than not, for racist reasons). This would include many theories about the Jewish people, genocide denial in general, and that slavery wasn't that bad.
 
Back
Top Bottom