Confederate Statues Were Built To Further A 'White Supremacist Future'
An informative read regarding the when, the why, and the where of erecting Confederate statues.
Let me presume that what you say is true. Now, let us look at the opposite side of that argument:
Statues went up in probably most, if not all states, honoring black people during times of racial strife. The most notable was Martin Luther King, Jr. His FBI files were so damning that a judge ordered them sealed for 50 years. There were other monuments and statues erected honoring blacks. There were even stamps commissioned by the Post Office to honor blacks.
During these times of racial discord, we have witnessed the removal of white names on street and road signs; schools and government buildings are renamed to honor black people. The government is even taking the faces of white people off the currency. They removed the Confederate flags as that was controversial and now, rather than move forward, another fight was started for what, on the surface, appears to be a slam dunk for the left. We'll get rid of all the symbols of the Confederacy. That was a freaking lie:
Just a couple of days ago, in Maryland, they took down the statue of Roger Taney. Taney was the fifth U.S. Supreme Court Justice to serve on the bench. It sure as hell didn't have anything to do with the Confederacy because Taney
died in 1864. So, why him?
In 1857 the United States Supreme Court ruled that blacks could not become citizens. Taney delivered the majority opinion. According to Wikipedia:
"
Taney spent pages 407–421 of his decision chronicling the history of slave and negro law in the British colonies and American states to decide if federal law could recognize Scott as a citizen of any state within the meaning of Article III. Relying upon statements made by Charles Pinckney, who had claimed authorship of the Privileges and Immunities Clause during the debates over the Missouri Compromise,[25] Taney decided: "the affirmative of these propositions cannot be maintained."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford
Taney did not legislate from the bench. He interpreted the law according to the facts and the law at that time. There is no evidence that has ever been entered that Taney was ever a racist. The real deal is that everything from America's past must be destroyed in order for the black leadership to be happy.
Now, once they have won the current battles, they will have to wage a war against the American flag. It was flying over the White House when the Dred Scott decision was handed down. The liberals, who finance and promote the war were the same people responsible for waging wars against the family, promoting gay rights, taking down nativity scenes, getting rid of the Ten Commandments at our courthouses, and pushing affirmative action / racial quotas / preferential hiring schemes / reverse discrimination.
Today, the change is all but complete. When the liberals, blacks, antifa, etc. factions have prevailed in their current wars then go for the flag, the last stop will be to remove the last symbol they find repulsive: the white people. The war is a subtle form of genocide against white people, but a war nonetheless.