- Joined
- Apr 28, 2015
- Messages
- 85,597
- Reaction score
- 72,309
- Location
- Third Coast
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Alright - I did a quick Google and if you're speaking of The Diamond Princess, I found 700 of 3,000 persons onboard became infected, and 6 passed of 700 infected. That's a transmission rate of around 25%, and a fatality rate of 0.85% of the infected.When the flu goes through a cruise ship, do five people die?
I'll accept your point. The fatality rate there was high - around 8-10X the rate for common influenza (0.1%). I can't comment on the transmission rate, beyond to say 25% of those onboard became infected.
If the numbers aboard that ship were representative, it seems to me that the virus is similar to the common flu but 8-10X more fatal. The fatality rate is concerning.
In comparison, the Spanish Flu of 1918 infected 25% of the world's population (same transmission rate as the Diamond Princess), and had a fatality rate of a little under 2%. So if we consider the difference in the level of healthcare then and now, and if the Diamond Princess numbers are representative, I might hazard a guess that the coronavirus has around the same physiological ramifications of the Spanish Flu. And yes, that's pretty serious. Not epochal, but serious enough no doubt.
(BTW - thanks for motivating me to research and run the numbers. I wasn't aware there were six fatalities onboard.)
Last edited: