• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Welcome to the Meat Wars

Jack Hays

Traveler
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
94,823
Reaction score
28,342
Location
Williamsburg, Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
It's getting hard to differentiate science from advocacy, especially when money is involved.


The Meat Wars: JAMA Stirs the Pot

Guest Essay by Kip Hansen — 20 January 2020 Rita Rubin, Senior Writer, JAMA Medical News & Perspectives, has stirred the pot on the controversy surrounding a series of studies published last Fall in the Annals of Internal Medicine, “one of the most widely cited and influential specialty medical journals in the world.” Her …
Continue reading →

Rita Rubin, Senior Writer, JAMA Medical News & Perspectives, has stirred the pot on the controversy surrounding a series of studies published last Fall in the Annals of Internal Medicine, “one of the most widely cited and influential specialty medical journals in the world.” Her latest piece, titled “Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists”, appeared in JAMA online on 15 January 2020. It begins with this:
“It’s almost unheard of for medical journals to get blowback for studies before the data are published. But that’s what happened to the Annals of Internal Medicine last fall as editors were about to post several studies showing that the evidence linking red meat consumption with cardiovascular disease and cancer is too weak to recommend that adults eat less of it.
Annals Editor-in-Chief Christine Laine, MD, MPH, saw her inbox flooded with roughly 2000 emails—most bore the same message, apparently generated by a bot—in a half hour. Laine’s inbox had to be shut down, she said. Not only was the volume unprecedented in her decade at the helm of the respected journal, the tone of the emails was particularly caustic.
“We’ve published a lot on firearm injury prevention,” Laine said. “The response from the NRA (National Rifle Association) was less vitriolic than the response from the True Health Initiative.”. . .

The JAMA article by Rita Rubin is a great deal more even handed. She states bluntly:
“But what has for the most part been overlooked is that Katz and THI and many of its council members [which includes Frank Hu and Walter Willett] have numerous industry ties themselves. The difference is that their ties are primarily with companies and organizations that stand to profit if people eat less red meat and a more plant-based diet. Unlike the beef industry, these entities are surrounded by an aura of health and wellness, although that isn’t necessarily evidence-based.”. . . .


 
It's getting hard to differentiate science from advocacy, especially when money is involved.

That being the only original contribution in an elaborate shill for a conspiracy blog (the same blog Jack has shilled a thousand times) is funny.
 
Credit to WUWT for expanding into healthcare when it helps the conspiracy theory.
 
www.cgiar.org › News & Events › News

[h=3]The meat wars: A backlash is occurring on the ... - CGIAR[/h]
VuVv3QPs02fWiOOHUiCPwCKlh3YLDmfwMhadiMAWqlG60QxMdwlmg80WaZ0R8nVRdd2nw2ILoff45WFRS5oF433GwfGuUdnPoJ 1wNy6AMy3JL67wAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==







5 days ago - Roy Lichenstein, Standing Rib (via Wikiart). On 19 Nov 2019, guidelines were published in the Annals of Internal Medicine that caused a ...
 
The JAMA article by Rita Rubin is a great deal more even handed. She states bluntly:

“But what has for the most part been overlooked is that Katz and THI and many of its council members [which includes Frank Hu and Walter Willett] have numerous industry ties themselves. The difference is that their ties are primarily with companies and organizations that stand to profit if people eat less red meat and a more plant-based diet. Unlike the beef industry, these entities are surrounded by an aura of health and wellness, although that isn’t necessarily evidence-based.”. . . .
Industries ties don't necessarily mean biased research, but it does seem (based on the JAMA article) that Dr. Katz in particular is intractably conflicted and is going well beyond the appropriate limits of his profession to quash contrary research, particularly the studies by Dr. Johnston et al.'s group.

Suffice it to say that if the claims in the article are true (a big 'if' these days, unfortunately), then I agree the THI is solidly in the wrong here, no matter their intentions.

The grand irony being that nobody but nobody who likes red meat gives a damn what nutritionists think of red meat, hence all the backing-and-forthing in the research is largely moot.
 
Vegans can be as vegan as they like.

I'm still gonna eat the hell out of this ham sandwich.
 
today's manufactured outrage is that the librulls are going to steal your bologna and make you eat lightlife deli slices. on a side note, they aren't quite as good, but they are a decent substitute for vegetarians who want a sandwich.
 
today's manufactured outrage is that the librulls are going to steal your bologna and make you eat lightlife deli slices. on a side note, they aren't quite as good, but they are a decent substitute for vegetarians who want a sandwich.

Sorry, but the "outrage" is coming from the other side. Learn first. Then post.
 
Sorry, but the "outrage" is coming from the other side. Learn first. Then post.

you posted the daily outrage thread. think first. then respond.
 
It's not a liberal-conservative issue. It's a science issue.

i'll place that next to your other "scientific" opinions in file 13.
 
i'll place that next to your other "scientific" opinions in file 13.

As you wish. Your prejudice is your prison.
Since you apparently didn't read anything, you may not have noticed it's Texas A&M vs Harvard.
 
As you wish. Your prejudice is your prison.
Since you apparently didn't read anything, you may not have noticed it's Texas A&M vs Harvard.

projection.
 
Well, no, since I have looked into the matter and you apparently have not.

My wife and kid eat meat, and no librulls have tried to confiscate it yet. I'm a vegetarian, but don't participate in the weekly raids to deny right wingers meat.
 
My wife and kid eat meat, and no librulls have tried to confiscate it yet. I'm a vegetarian, but don't participate in the weekly raids to deny right wingers meat.

It is not a right-left issue. You are parading your ignorance.
 
It is not a right-left issue. You are parading your ignorance.

it's a victim / aggressor bologna theft issue. luckily, no one is going to steal your bologna. feel free to report back if someone does, however.
 
Back
Top Bottom