• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Experts split sharply over experimental Alzheimer’s drug

JacksinPA

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 3, 2017
Messages
26,290
Reaction score
16,771
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Experts split sharply over experimental Alzheimer’s drug

SAN DIEGO (AP) — A company that claims to have the first drug to slow mental decline from Alzheimer’s disease made its case to scientists Thursday but left them sharply divided over whether there’s enough evidence of effectiveness for the medicine to warrant federal approval.

Excitement and skepticism have surrounded aducanumab since its developers stopped two studies earlier this year because it didn’t seem to be working, then did a stunning about-face in October and said new results suggest it was effective at a high dose.
=====================================================================
Whether it works or not, it will be just what big pharma wants: an expensive drug that you will have to take every day for the rest of your life. And how do I know that this will be an expensive drug? The 'mab' at the end of its generic name is pharma shorthand for a 'monoclonal antibody,' a biologic drug. Without going into the biology of how these work, they are expensive to first produce in testable quantities, then outrageously expensive to manufacture in the huge quantities needed to treat every possible person who may be coming down with this disease. Who will be able to afford to pay for it?
 
Experts split sharply over experimental Alzheimer’s drug

SAN DIEGO (AP) — A company that claims to have the first drug to slow mental decline from Alzheimer’s disease made its case to scientists Thursday but left them sharply divided over whether there’s enough evidence of effectiveness for the medicine to warrant federal approval.

Excitement and skepticism have surrounded aducanumab since its developers stopped two studies earlier this year because it didn’t seem to be working, then did a stunning about-face in October and said new results suggest it was effective at a high dose.
=====================================================================
Whether it works or not, it will be just what big pharma wants: an expensive drug that you will have to take every day for the rest of your life. And how do I know that this will be an expensive drug? The 'mab' at the end of its generic name is pharma shorthand for a 'monoclonal antibody,' a biologic drug. Without going into the biology of how these work, they are expensive to first produce in testable quantities, then outrageously expensive to manufacture in the huge quantities needed to treat every possible person who may be coming down with this disease. Who will be able to afford to pay for it?

Let China steal it and test it, and if it’s good take it back by enforcing the patent.
 
Whether it works or not, it will be just what big pharma wants: an expensive drug that you will have to take every day for the rest of your life.

Pretty sure more than just "big pharma" wants an effective treatment for Alzheimer's.
 
Pretty sure more than just "big pharma" wants an effective treatment for Alzheimer's.

Sure they do, but the deeper they go the more expensive the R&D gets. Pfizer dropped its major anti-Alzheimer's drug R&D program a few years back.
 
Experts split sharply over experimental Alzheimer’s drug

SAN DIEGO (AP) — A company that claims to have the first drug to slow mental decline from Alzheimer’s disease made its case to scientists Thursday but left them sharply divided over whether there’s enough evidence of effectiveness for the medicine to warrant federal approval.

Excitement and skepticism have surrounded aducanumab since its developers stopped two studies earlier this year because it didn’t seem to be working, then did a stunning about-face in October and said new results suggest it was effective at a high dose.
=====================================================================
Whether it works or not, it will be just what big pharma wants: an expensive drug that you will have to take every day for the rest of your life. And how do I know that this will be an expensive drug? The 'mab' at the end of its generic name is pharma shorthand for a 'monoclonal antibody,' a biologic drug. Without going into the biology of how these work, they are expensive to first produce in testable quantities, then outrageously expensive to manufacture in the huge quantities needed to treat every possible person who may be coming down with this disease. Who will be able to afford to pay for it?

Let's all hope it works and worry about the cost later. I've got family affected by it and it's not pretty.

I'm also on a biologic for psoriatic arthritis, and it's a miracle drug from where I sit. It's stunning to me that a drug now out of patent keeps going UP in price - about double what it was when I started on it - but it's been a godsend to my overall health and ability to do what I want to do.
 
Sure they do, but the deeper they go the more expensive the R&D gets. Pfizer dropped its major anti-Alzheimer's drug R&D program a few years back.

I'm not sure what you're arguing. That pursuing and bringing to market an effective Alzheimer's treatment wouldn't be worth it? Or that the company that eventually succeeds at it doesn't deserve a windfall for the effort?
 
I'm not sure what you're arguing. That pursuing and bringing to market an effective Alzheimer's treatment wouldn't be worth it? Or that the company that eventually succeeds at it doesn't deserve a windfall for the effort?

The cost (& risk) associated with the R&D to develop & market an effective drug can be staggering.
 
Pretty sure more than just "big pharma" wants an effective treatment for Alzheimer's.

Several big pharma companies, like Pfizer, have given up on developing effective Alzheimers' drugs.
 
Back
Top Bottom