• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S. Is “Most Dangerous” Place in Developed World to Give Birth

Dittohead not!

master political analyst
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
52,009
Reaction score
33,944
Location
The Golden State
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
U.S. Is “Most Dangerous” Place in Developed World to Give Birth


The U.S. is the “most dangerous place to give birth in the developed world,” according to a USA Today investigation.


Every year in the U.S., more than 50,000 mothers are severely injured during or after childbirth and 700 die.


California presents a notable exception. According to the USA Today investigation, hospitals and safety advocates there have instituted practices that have cut the state’s maternal death rate in half.


If you can't afford to leave the country to have a baby, come to California.
 
U.S. Is “Most Dangerous” Place in Developed World to Give Birth

That metric is conceptually comparable to saying "so and so was the slowest qualifier for the Indy 500." Quite simply, no developed country is a bad place to give birth, even if the U.S. is the worst among the best places in the world to give birth.
 
That metric is conceptually comparable to saying "so and so was the slowest qualifier for the Indy 500." Quite simply, no developed country is a bad place to give birth, even if the U.S. is the worst among the best places in the world to give birth.

No doubt, compared to Haiti or El Salvador, the US is a great place for childbirth and for other health care as well.
 
No doubt, compared to Haiti or El Salvador, the US is a great place for childbirth and for other health care as well.

Yes, but if you clicked on the link I provided, you'll have observed that the U.S. and the rest of the developed world is a fine place to give birth period and in comparison to myriad other places, not just Haiti and El Salvador.
 
Yes, but if you clicked on the link I provided, you'll have observed that the U.S. and the rest of the developed world is a fine place to give birth period and in comparison to myriad other places, not just Haiti and El Salvador.

I'm sure it compares well with all of the "****hole countries."
 
I'm sure it compares well with all of the "****hole countries."

Of course it does; however, your observing that brings us back to my original point and the one for which I provided credible support:
U.S. Is “Most Dangerous” Place in Developed World to Give Birth
That metric is conceptually comparable to saying "so and so was the slowest qualifier for the Indy 500." Quite simply, no developed country is a bad place to give birth, even if the U.S. is the worst among the best places in the world to give birth.
 
I'm sure it compares well with all of the "****hole countries."

Actually the us compares well to developed countries. The Us being "the most dangerous place in the developed world to have a baby".. is really an emotional diatribe for the most part.

A large part of the differences are the differences the US uses in categorizing post pregnancy death etc.. (I already provided a link to this in another thread on the topic).

Some of the other difference is that we have higher proportions of complicated/high risk pregnancies, not having universal healthcare with good pre birth care for the mother.. and demographics like obesity etc.
 
Actually the us compares well to developed countries. The Us being "the most dangerous place in the developed world to have a baby".. is really an emotional diatribe for the most part.

A large part of the differences are the differences the US uses in categorizing post pregnancy death etc.. (I already provided a link to this in another thread on the topic).

Some of the other difference is that we have higher proportions of complicated/high risk pregnancies, not having universal healthcare with good pre birth care for the mother.. and demographics like obesity etc.

That first one could be remedied rather easily. I'm not sure about the second one. It would require a major change of lifestyle for many Americans.
 
That first one could be remedied rather easily. I'm not sure about the second one. It would require a major change of lifestyle for many Americans.

The universal healthcare is probably the smallest piece of the puzzle since its such a tiny amount. That's in part why your article is a bit of fluff. Its trying to portray that its our system rather than reality.
 
Back
Top Bottom