• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

More recent evidence that capitalism would reduce health care costs 80%

danielpalos said:
How much can be attributed to R&D? That is expensive. It cost Gillette, around a billion dollars to develop the Mach 3. Then they spent almost as much, upgrading their local infrastructure.

We should try to get that CEO instead of our current CEO.
Click to expand...

Seriously they spent a billion developping that POS?
 
Computer advances are making complex equations possible.

it used to take years to place engines correctly on airplanes with wind tunnel testing; now it is almost, "snap into place" possible based on engine parameters.
 
danielpalos said:
i guess i read more into this or confused another article:

Gillette Production Line | Gillette spends $750 million to make Mach3 Huge covert operation for new production line of three-blade razor - tribunedigital-baltimoresun
Click to expand...

Not necessarily, the title gives the idea 750 million was the cost to mak the mach 3 and the following hints that the development cost even more
Keep in mind that this $750 million does not include the money spent on the research and development of the Mach3 prototype, which at various times was known by such code names as Manx, 225, and "the Frankenstein razor" (because its bolted profile resembled the silhouette of the monster).
Click to expand...

No matter how you look at it it was a huge pile of money
 
Quag said:
Not necessarily, the title gives the idea 750 million was the cost to mak the mach 3 and the following hints that the development cost even more


No matter how you look at it it was a huge pile of money
Click to expand...

upgrading infrastructure, usually does.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom