why not cut the clowning and tell us if you support socialized health care or capitalist health care and why?
Still running scared, huh? Define "efficiency" as it pertains to the evaluation of health care systems. Either that, or admit you're ignorant about it, and then I'll teach you. And stop trying to change the subject. We're talking about which system is more efficient at making providing health care to a population of people. Yo when you said that "socialized" medicine is more expensive. Now you don't like being held to account for your ignorance (or dishonesty), but that's not my problem. So just answer my questions and I'll be happy to answer yours in words that even you can understand.
well I am biased toward freedom and capitalism based on Cuba /Florida, East/West Germany, Hong Kong/Red China, USA/USSR, etc etc. You do understand that this is only logical?
You are biased toward your ideology. That's all you know, and all you care about. That much seem obvious.
we know the USA spends 3 times what Europe and Canada spend for same results. That tell us that our system is very very inefficient. 1+1=2
Another dodge. Answer the questions. You said that socialized health care systems are more costly. That's not true. Now you need to own up to your ignorance.
I agree but our subject was the definition of conservative. Buckley Friedman Jefferson and Aristotle and many other intellectual leaders supported freedom from govt. That is why Jefferson founded the Republican Party that we know and love today. Do you want to tell us why their definition would not hold up in middle school or do you want to change the subject and hope no one will notice??
You don't understand this, but your definitions (i.e. "liberal means govt and conservative means freedom") have NOTHING to do with Buckley, Friedman and Jefferson. They are not the problem. You are.
sure I do, I care that East Germany did not do as well West Germany, Cuba Florida. USA/USSR. Do you understand the truth now??.......sure I know Taiwan did far better than China, Florida far better than Cuba. Do you understand?
:roll:Geez...I understand that you are not too bright (or, perhaps just really young), and that you're perfectly comfortable being that way. In other words, you're a fairly typical ideologue. Facts are only relevant to you if they re-affirm your existing biases.
Buckley was greatest conservative leader of post war era so was more responsible for definition of term conservative than anybody else. There were rival but secondary schools of thought too which had somewhat different definitions. Do you grasp this now?
ANOTHER dodge. Buckley was a racist who believed that white supremacy was "absolutely" justified, and he believed that to be entirely in keeping with "conservatism" as he defined it. He's a hero of yours, and you believe in "conservatism" as defined by him. And you'd like that definition, which includes the fallacy of white intellectual and cultural supremacy, to be taught to American children in middle school. So.........YES, I "grasp" EXACTLY what that says about you. And I'm not surprised by it, in the least. But, no, Buckley doesn't get to define "conservative" any more than someone like Pat Robertson or Franklin Graham gets to define "Christian". Now, you may not "grasp" that, but that's not really important.