• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Damage to Children's Health Insurance Is Already Being Done

Unitedwestand13

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
20,738
Reaction score
6,290
Location
Sunnyvale California
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
It has been 53 day since congress has failed to reauthorize federal funding for The Children’s Health Insurance Program...

Right now, a draft of a letter informing thousands of Virginia parents that their kids might lose their health coverage just after the holidays is sitting on Linda Nablo’s desk. “People are going to panic,” Nablo, who is the chief deputy director of the Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services, told me. “It’s going to cause mass confusion. It’s going to be an increase in the lack of trust in government, that government will do what it says it will do. People will lose their managed-care plans. They’ll lose their provider. It’s going to cause chaos.”

Nablo and her colleagues have drafted the letter because, for more than 50 days, Congress has failed to reauthorize funding for the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or CHIP, a federal-state initiative that covers about nine million lower-income kids. Within weeks, states will start running out of money, leaving them scrambling to patch the holes in their budgets or forced to suspend their programs and drop coverage—as Virginia expects it would have to do. “Every day that goes by, we’re getting increasingly concerned,” Nablo said. “Nobody ever anticipated we’d be in this situation. We’re taking very concrete steps as if we’re going to shut this program down.”

Hill staffers insist and the states anticipate that Congress will pass new funding for CHIP in the coming weeks. But the situation has left doctors fuming, administrators bewildered, parents frightened, and politicians shocked. Even if no states end up running out of money and no kids end up losing coverage, the dithering has already diverted state resources, degraded state programs, and sapped state coffers, and Congress’s dysfunction has pushed the stability of an effective, respected program with bipartisan support into doubt.

Created by the late Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts and Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah, CHIP covers kids whose families earn too much to qualify for Medicaid but do not have employer-sponsored plans or cannot afford coverage on the Obamacare exchanges. The program works: It is credited with helping to cut the uninsured rate for kids by more than half, while also reducing hospitalization rates, improving kids’ educational outcomes, and bolstering their families’ economic well-being. It is also a safety-net rarity in today’s polarized Washington, with strong and deep bipartisan support.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...-threat-to-childrens-health-insurance/546662/
 
I’m just not quite sure, why parents aren’t responsible for taking out insurance.

The parents were responsible, they signed up for CHIP in order to make sure their children were covered. They did not foresee the possibility of their own elected officials failing to act and pay for this program.
 
The parents were responsible, they signed up for CHIP in order to make sure their children were covered. They did not foresee the possibility of their own elected officials failing to act and pay for this program.

Being responsible does not really mean making someone else pay. That is free riding.
 
The parents were responsible, they signed up for CHIP in order to make sure their children were covered. They did not foresee the possibility of their own elected officials failing to act and pay for this program.

That’s interesting because Illinois’ CHIP program was cancelled the day Obamacare became law.
 
The government is offering a service that is paid for by all of us collectively.

It is offering a private good, which is not efficient and thus does society damage. A pity that we don’t make these technical decisions technically.
 
That’s interesting because Illinois’ CHIP program was cancelled the day Obamacare became law.

That’s interesting.
 
It is offering a private good, which is not efficient and thus does society damage. A pity that we don’t make these technical decisions technically.

And taking away said good somehow does not count as damage to society?
 
God, I hate it when I’m wrong. Crap. Apparently the child part was kept. My bad. Thank you for shattering my afternoon. ;) ;)

This is just a GUESS on my part. But i think you misunderstood when Illinois probably took the CHIP program off of their web site. So now people in Illinois need to go to the Fed Web site for CHIP.

I say probably because when ACA went into effect many states did what they could to kill it. There's an (R) governor in Illinois. Yes? so Ill. has no state ACA web site, so people need to use the Fed web site.

I don't live there, so IDK for sure. So it's just a guess.

Honest mistake on your part.
 
I’m just not quite sure, why parents aren’t responsible for taking out insurance.

I think the point of the program was that this was for children of working parents who made just enough not to qualify for Medicaid but too little to afford insurance anywhere else. So it is a safety net program. Are you against all safety net programs or only those that address health care needs of the children of the working poor? Your posts pretty much sound like, "Oh how irresponsible of these parents to be so poor."
 
I think the point of the program was that this was for children of working parents who made just enough not to qualify for Medicaid but too little to afford insurance anywhere else. So it is a safety net program. Are you against all safety net programs or only those that address health care needs of the children of the working poor? Your posts pretty much sound like, "Oh how irresponsible of these parents to be so poor."

Here in NY it's not just the working poor'. I know a few Middle Class people who can't get HI for their kids because their employer doesn't offer it, or they are in business for themselves so they get it on the NYS exchange. At a very nice low price too.

But they're teenagers, so they probably seldom, if ever need HC/HI. But just in case it is a nice safety net.
 
The ineptitude here is staggering. These loons need to get their priorities in order: put the push for tax cuts for millionaires on hold until funding for children's health care can be secured.
 
The ineptitude here is staggering. These loons need to get their priorities in order: put the push for tax cuts for millionaires on hold until funding for children's health care can be secured.

Poor children do not give to campaigns.... just sayin'
 
Back
Top Bottom