• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Coverage isn't enough

Greenbeard

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
20,229
Reaction score
21,621
Location
Cambridge, MA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
Don Berwick, one of the preeminent names in health care quality improvement, has a piece today arguing the House and Senate health bills wouldn't simply savagely curtail coverage, they "would set back the quality of care for all of us."

Health Care Coverage Is Not Enough. We Need Delivery System Reform.
It’s well known that the bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA) now making its way through the Senate would deny coverage to tens of millions of Americans. Less well known is that it would also hit the brakes on “delivery system reform,” the work of doctors and hospitals to improve quality and reduce costs. In other words, it would make quality of care worse.

The Senate’s “Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017” would defund Medicaid programs that help people receive care at home instead of having to be in nursing homes and hospitals. It would massively increase cost sharing, which would force people to delay needed care, worsening their outcomes. It would end the ACA’s prevention fund, which supports innovations to prevent heart disease, diabetes, cancer, and stroke. And it would force hospitals into new levels of deficit, where they would have trouble finding the resources to invest in improving their care. Some hospitals, particularly in rural area, would even close their doors.

Under the then brand-new Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation – an ACA creation – CMS organized a partnership among more than 4,000 hospitals to reduce errors in care (like hospital-acquired infections, pressure sores, and surgical mishaps) and needless hospital readmissions. Over five years, this program averted 87,000 deaths, 2 million patient injuries, and nearly $20 billion in costs due to errors.

Under the ACA, over 500 new partnerships between Medicare and local groups of doctors and hospitals have formed – so-called “Accountable Care Organizations,” trying to give over 10 million Medicare beneficiaries better patient satisfaction, better outcomes, and lower costs.

The ACA and other laws require publicly available measurements of quality for hospitals, and they use payment to encourage adoption of electronic medical records, which are, at last, ubiquitous in hospitals and taking root in many office practices. In 2009, fewer than 20% of US physicians had electronic medical records; today, more than 80% do. Overall health care costs will be $2.6 trillion lower over the decade following enactment of the ACA than projected even while millions more people have insurance.

This is “delivery system reform” - changing the processes of care. It’s a much better way to reduce costs, through improving the quality of care, rather than shifting the burden to patients and families. Instead of waiting for trouble in chronically ill patients, for example, reaching out proactively into their homes, intercepting deterioration and averting the need for a hospital stay. Standardize best practices using checklists and reminder systems. Help telemedicine take off, giving doctors and patients easier ways to interact at lower cost than in traditional office visits.
 
Don Berwick, one of the preeminent names in health care quality improvement, has a piece today arguing the House and Senate health bills wouldn't simply savagely curtail coverage, they "would set back the quality of care for all of us."

Health Care Coverage Is Not Enough. We Need Delivery System Reform.

It seems quite clear that it is more than just the coverage that needs change. But I think that that is something that should mostly find its own way. If you get remuneration and participation right, the rest will find its way.
 
Wait..... "Health Insurance Coverage" =/= "Access to Healthcare" ??!?


But... but.... but.... I thought the whole last 8 years of this debate hinged on the assumption by those who insisted the only metric that mattered was "are more people covered" was that it did?



Gosh, I'm so confused. Next they're going to tell me that when we institute price ceilings, we reduce supply, or something crazy like that...
 
Wait..... "Health Insurance Coverage" =/= "Access to Healthcare" ??!?

Delivery system reform is primarily about quality and costs. Though I suppose if done right it can increase capacity, too.

But... but.... but.... I thought the whole last 8 years of this debate hinged on the assumption by those who insisted the only metric that mattered was "are more people covered" was that it did?

You should've spent more time reading my threads. I've been banging the drum on the importance of the ACA's payment and delivery system reforms for years.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15
 
Delivery system reform is primarily about quality and costs. Though I suppose if done right it can increase capacity, too.



You should've spent more time reading my threads. I've been banging the drum on the importance of the ACA's payment and delivery system reforms for years.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Except some of the ACA's payment and delivery system reforms have decreased quality of care.

We just had one of the major facilities that handled long term care in one of our communities close. It was the only SNF within 100 miles that accepted state Medicaid. The reason that it closed? the push to not allow patients that need long term care to be in nursing homes.. and bundled payments from the hospital which caused the hospital to dictate to the SNF their length of stay. So CVA patients that needed and qualified through medicare for 60 days of rehab.. only got 10 days of therapy and had to go home. If the SNF did what was appropriate for the patient.. but was over the length of stay the hospital wanted for the patient.. the hospital cut referrals to the SNF.

this facility has been in business for 60 years and was an excellent non profit.
 
Back
Top Bottom