• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

California single-payer comes into focus

Yes and any who avoid preventative treatment, whether uninsured or too poor for deductibles, may end up hospitalized, which drives up the cost greatly. I gave only one example with diabetes. There are many chronic conditions that fall in this category, some costing the entire deductible just for one procedure

Well first.. you need to realize that many insurance don't pay for preventative treatments. Medicaid and the VA are among the worst.

Second.. many people whose insurance does pay for preventative treatments.. simply choose not to and choose to ignore their medical problems until they become more of an issue.. or worse an emergency.
 
Update: this isn't happening.

Single-payer health care put on hold in California as leader calls bill ‘woefully incomplete’
SACRAMENTO — A proposal to bring universal health care to California — replacing the private insurance market with a government-run single-payer plan — was abruptly put on hold Friday by Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, all but ensuring the nationally touted measure will not pass the Legislature this year.

Earlier this month, the state Senate voted to pass a $400 billion plan sponsored by the California Nurses Association, sending it to the Assembly. But the measure had few details — including how the state would raise the money to pay for it.

Rendon said he supported the concept of single-payer health care but called the bill “woefully incomplete.”

“Even senators who voted for SB 562 noted there are potentially fatal flaws in the bill,” he said in a statement issued late Friday afternoon, “including the fact it does not address many serious issues, such as financing, delivery of care, cost controls or the realities of needed action by the Trump administration and voters to make SB 562 a genuine piece of legislation.

“In light of this, I have decided SB 562 will remain in the Assembly Rules Committee until further notice.”

Rendon called the Senate's bill "a statement of values" rather than a real policy. Which is fair, though one could argue that his legislative chamber has the chance to do something about that.
 
Back
Top Bottom