• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Only the rich get what they want out of this Obamacare repeal bill

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,343
Reaction score
82,728
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Only the rich get what they want out of this Obamacare repeal bill

Now that Republicans run the government, we are seeing which set of concerns they choose to prioritize, given limited available resources. The unsurprising answer is that Republicans will make a priority of repealing substantially all the tax increases in Obamacare, most of which fall on people who make over $200,000 a year. If House Speaker Paul Ryan gets his way, people who hated Obamacare because of the taxes it imposed will get nearly everything they wanted. But much of the rest of the law would stay in place. And people who hated the law for non-tax reasons — they thought insurance premiums were too high, they didn't like being penalized for not having insurance, they didn't like cuts to Medicare — mostly wouldn't get what they were expecting.

This Obamacare repeal plan leaves out much of the wish list of the anti-Obamacare coalition. It lacks most of the deregulatory provisions that were supposed to make insurance cheaper and offset the reductions in subsidies offered to many Americans. It would likely result in millions of Americans losing health insurance. It offers no restoration of Medicare benefits to the seniors who were activated to vote Republican over Medicare cuts in the 2010 election. Yet curiously, some groups did not have to compromise: wealthy people, medical-device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, tanning salons.

Making (the affluent in) America Great Again
 
No, unless done to the exclusion of others.

You are thinking of the whom? Of the people that exclude themselves from productive lives? Of the ones that are not socialized to fend for themselves by their parents and fall away? I think we have tried taking the weight of the world onto our shoulders and it has not worked well.
 
You are thinking of the whom? Of the people that exclude themselves from productive lives? Of the ones that are not socialized to fend for themselves by their parents and fall away? I think we have tried taking the weight of the world onto our shoulders and it has not worked well.
No, I'm speaking of applying benefits and political force in an even fashion, not to benefit specific (often connected) groups.

If TrumpCare is going to reduce the tax burden, reduce it for all groups across the board.
 
You are thinking of the whom? Of the people that exclude themselves from productive lives? Of the ones that are not socialized to fend for themselves by their parents and fall away? I think we have tried taking the weight of the world onto our shoulders and it has not worked well.

Ah, yes. We're on the "the poor deserve it" routine again.
 
Ah, yes. We're on the "the poor deserve it" routine again.

Not at all. But they also do not "deserve" help. Why should my secretary have money taken away from her for someone she doesn't know any better that the kid starving in South Sudan?
 
No, I'm speaking of applying benefits and political force in an even fashion, not to benefit specific (often connected) groups.

If TrumpCare is going to reduce the tax burden, reduce it for all groups across the board.

That would be an excellent argument to derive most taxes from a VAT.
 
Back
Top Bottom