• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary outlines health care plan in NEJM. Trump doesn't get around to it.

Threegoofs

Threegoofs

Sophisticated man-about-town
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Messages
63,556
Reaction score
28,917
Location
The city Fox News viewers are afraid to travel to
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
If this doesnt tell you what a sham the Trump campaign is, I dont know what will.

The NEJM asked the candidates to outline their health care plan in the latest issue. Trump declined.

Oddly, Trump is the one who says he will repeal Obamacare and would therefore NEED to have a good plan to replace it.

I guess he's keeping his plan secret so he doesnt tell the enemy (who is apparently the American People) exactly what he will do.

MMS: Error

Sad!
 
Threegoofs said:
If this doesnt tell you what a sham the Trump campaign is, I dont know what will.

The NEJM asked the candidates to outline their health care plan in the latest issue. Trump declined.

Oddly, Trump is the one who says he will repeal Obamacare and would therefore NEED to have a good plan to replace it.

I guess he's keeping his plan secret so he doesnt tell the enemy (who is apparently the American People) exactly what he will do.

MMS: Error

Sad!
Click to expand...

Trump is right not to expect fair treatment from the NEJM.
 
Threegoofs said:
If this doesnt tell you what a sham the Trump campaign is, I dont know what will.

The NEJM asked the candidates to outline their health care plan in the latest issue. Trump declined.

Oddly, Trump is the one who says he will repeal Obamacare and would therefore NEED to have a good plan to replace it.

I guess he's keeping his plan secret so he doesnt tell the enemy (who is apparently the American People) exactly what he will do.

MMS: Error

Sad!
Click to expand...

Probably doesn't even have a health care plan.
 
Threegoofs said:
If this doesnt tell you what a sham the Trump campaign is, I dont know what will.

The NEJM asked the candidates to outline their health care plan in the latest issue. Trump declined.

Oddly, Trump is the one who says he will repeal Obamacare and would therefore NEED to have a good plan to replace it.

I guess he's keeping his plan secret so he doesnt tell the enemy (who is apparently the American People) exactly what he will do.

MMS: Error

Sad!
Click to expand...

Hillary should have declined to supply them with her position.

Face it, NEJM...while being quite partisan...is not stupid. The people who read that journal aren't stupid either. There will be quite a number of people who read her drivel who will ask...right from the beginning..."who's going to pay for all this". Hillary's not say, though.

Typically, she spouts a whole bunch of feel-good freebies that she wants to give away but she doesn't bother to consider the cost. Liberal money grows on trees, I guess.

Another thing many will question is the increase in government control that'll be required by much of her desires. At the very least, I don't think the insurance companies will be supporting her when she tells them...under force of government...how much they must pay for prescriptions...and how much they must charge their policy holders.

In any case, I'd rather Trump get to work with Congress after he's elected to de-governmentize our health system than pay any attention to Hillary hiding the effects of her proposals before she's even elected.
 
Mycroft said:
Hillary should have declined to supply them with her position.

Face it, NEJM...while being quite partisan...is not stupid. The people who read that journal aren't stupid either. There will be quite a number of people who read her drivel who will ask...right from the beginning..."who's going to pay for all this". Hillary's not say, though.

Typically, she spouts a whole bunch of feel-good freebies that she wants to give away but she doesn't bother to consider the cost. Liberal money grows on trees, I guess.

Another thing many will question is the increase in government control that'll be required by much of her desires. At the very least, I don't think the insurance companies will be supporting her when she tells them...under force of government...how much they must pay for prescriptions...and how much they must charge their policy holders.

In any case, I'd rather Trump get to work with Congress after he's elected to de-governmentize our health system than pay any attention to Hillary hiding the effects of her proposals before she's even elected.
Click to expand...

NEJM is partisan? I guess it is when you consider 'reason' and 'facts' to be partisan material.

And thanks for confirming you didnt even bother to read the link.

Its apparently quite taxing to have to comprehend things, and much easier to create the strawmen to fight with in your head.
 
Threegoofs said:
If this doesnt tell you what a sham the Trump campaign is, I dont know what will.

The NEJM asked the candidates to outline their health care plan in the latest issue. Trump declined.

Oddly, Trump is the one who says he will repeal Obamacare and would therefore NEED to have a good plan to replace it.

I guess he's keeping his plan secret so he doesnt tell the enemy (who is apparently the American People) exactly what he will do.

MMS: Error

Sad!
Click to expand...

No. That is probably not the reason for not giving any detail. The rule has it that in most complicated policies there is no absolutely best answer and that a better one can be found as soon as the other candidate make their proposal.
I would have to look up the exact name of this one, but it resembles the Condorcet Paradox reasonably well.
 
Threegoofs said:
NEJM is partisan? I guess it is when you consider 'reason' and 'facts' to be partisan material.

And thanks for confirming you didnt even bother to read the link.

Its apparently quite taxing to have to comprehend things, and much easier to create the strawmen to fight with in your head.
Click to expand...

Oh, I read Hillary's article. That's why I was able to zero in on the salient portions of her screed.
 
Threegoofs said:
Right.

Doesnt have a health care plan he wants to publicize among readers of the New England Journal of Medicine.

He follows the old saying.... Better to remain silent and be thought stupid than to open your mouth and demonstrate it.
Click to expand...

Give me a break, if readers of the New England Journal of Medicine are too stupid to go to the Donald J Trump website, I'm not sure what to tell you.
 
countryboy said:
Give me a break, if readers of the New England Journal of Medicine are too stupid to go to the Donald J Trump website, I'm not sure what to tell you.
Click to expand...

Yes. They invited the candidates to share their plans.

Apparently, they are too stupid to know Trump wouldn't respond because his plan is on a website already.

This shows, frankly, that Trump and his team are too incompetent to print off their own plan and mail it to NEJM.

No surprise. None of them probably read much outside of Breitbart News....
 
Threegoofs said:
Yes. They invited the candidates to share their plans.

Apparently, they are too stupid to know Trump wouldn't respond because his plan is on a website already.

This shows, frankly, that Trump and his team are too incompetent to print off their own plan and mail it to NEJM.

No surprise. None of them probably read much outside of Breitbart News....
Click to expand...

Do you honestly believe your hyperbolic nonsense will sway any thinking person?
 
countryboy said:
Do you honestly believe your hyperbolic nonsense will sway any thinking person?
Click to expand...

Given that Trump supporters clearly don't fit the category of 'thinking person', the answer is no.

But it's fun for all of us to point and laugh at them from time to time.
 
Threegoofs said:
Given that Trump supporters clearly don't fit the category of 'thinking person', the answer is no.

But it's fun for all of us to point and laugh at them from time to time.
Click to expand...

Not everyone voting for Trump is a supporter. You and your ilk just don't get it. But that's okay, your silly nonsense will only serve to galvanize Hillary's opponents. Keep it up, please.
 
countryboy said:
Not everyone voting for Trump is a supporter. You and your ilk just don't get it. But that's okay, your silly nonsense will only serve to galvanize Hillary's opponents. Keep it up, please.
Click to expand...

Trump supporters are intellectually challenged, that's for sure.

Trump non-supporters who are voting for Trump are the true bottom dwellers in the lake of smarts.
 
Threegoofs said:
If this doesnt tell you what a sham the Trump campaign is, I dont know what will.

The NEJM asked the candidates to outline their health care plan in the latest issue. Trump declined.

Oddly, Trump is the one who says he will repeal Obamacare and would therefore NEED to have a good plan to replace it.

I guess he's keeping his plan secret so he doesnt tell the enemy (who is apparently the American People) exactly what he will do.

MMS: Error

Sad!
Click to expand...

Trump plan: Bread and circus.
 
Threegoofs said:
Trump supporters are intellectually challenged, that's for sure.

Trump non-supporters who are voting for Trump are the true bottom dwellers in the lake of smarts.
Click to expand...

They are all just deplorables...right?
 
Mycroft said:
In any case, I'd rather Trump get to work with Congress after he's elected to de-governmentize our health system than pay any attention to Hillary hiding the effects of her proposals before she's even elected.
Click to expand...

The problem is that healthcare has been interfered with so much, on all levels (especially with pharmaceuticals), that it might be too broken to go back to something less regulated/more privatized and have it be viable. Single payer may be the only thing that can work until things get straightened out more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom