- Joined
- Feb 7, 2012
- Messages
- 58,282
- Reaction score
- 26,407
- Location
- Mentor Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Not at all. You said that auto insurance is required. It is not.Is than an attempt at humor?
Not at all. You said that auto insurance is required. It is not.Is than an attempt at humor?
Not at all. You said that auto insurance is required. It is not.
You are just trying to argue then. I meant....if you are a driver....you are required..... Better?
The OP of this thread deals specifically with the costs of PPACA and the vast majority of posts comply with the intended subject. It appears you want to change the topic to the legitimacy of the mandate. If this is your desire I suggest you initiate another thread as I'm sure we don't have a sufficient amount already...
No not my intent. I posed a question so that I could redirect to topic. Just never got an response that would allow me to do so.
Original post:
I will not be coerced into getting insurance
Do you have auto insurance?
How fair it must seem to all you liberals and obama kool-aid drinkers to know that congress and the president do not have to worry about all this math. they are exempt. Great eh??? next will be hepatitis clauses for tattoo's... whether you have them or not.
They are only exempt because their employer provides them with insurance, just as many peoples employers provides them with insurance, and thus makes them exempt.