• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gun Violence Chicago

He'll accuse you of ":rabbit holing" and "intentional dishonesty" next (they're two of his favorites).

;) I have been accused of a whole lot worse. I'm going to have to look up rabbit holing. Think I get the drift....
 
Guns are devices designed to kill. Anyone who doesn't concede that can't be taken seriously.

AR 15's are the favorite of mass shooters. AR's are direct copies of the military M-16, slightly modified for civilian use and designed for easy customization.

There is no excuse for military-type weapons in the hands of civilians in this country. It is obscene that it is accepted, mass produced and marketed as just one more consumer product you can buy at your friendly local gun shop or Cabelas. Or BassPro. Or online.

1) AR's are only favored by some mass shooters and not most. People like you have done everything possible to influence nutcases that they ought to use AR 15s

2) what sort of firearms did the founders contemplate in the second amendment

3) why are you happy having the civilian police use "military weapons" in our civilian neighborhoods

The less one knows about firearms, the more likely they are to be anti gun.
 
Hunters can still buy bolt action rifles. If people really want to hunt, bolt action rifles are perfectly adequate.

Our second Amendment isn't about hunting. We have guns because nunya.
 
Hunters can still buy bolt action rifles. If people really want to hunt, bolt action rifles are perfectly adequate.

why do you want to give criminals a huge advantage over honest citizens?
 
why do you want to give criminals a huge advantage over honest citizens?

It is actually you who want to do that, by allowing a gun supply system that permits mass shooters to gun down innocent, unarmed people.
 
why do you want to give criminals a huge advantage over honest citizens?

Because his goal is about controlling you, me and our freedoms not about protecting people. If they wanted to protect people they would have done something to stop crime in places like Chicago and NY. Instead they use those people as fodder to advance their gun grabbing. They need to disarm people like me before they can ever truly take our freedoms. Hitler did the same thing.
 
It is actually you who want to do that, by allowing a gun supply system that permits mass shooters to gun down innocent, unarmed people.

Says the crowd that revulsed when Trump tried to stop violent rioters.
 
I don't recall a single high profile mass shooting in this country using handguns in the past ten years. Please explain.

1) Dylan Root and the black church
2) Dayton shooting August 19, 2019
3) Pensacola Naval base shooting-Dec 2019
4) Va Beach shooting May 19, 2019=12 dead-handguns
5) thousand Oaks shooting 11/7/18 12 dead victims-handguns

there are dozens more. You didn't make any effort to look
 
Because his goal is about controlling you, me and our freedoms not about protecting people. If they wanted to protect people they would have done something to stop crime in places like Chicago and NY. Instead they use those people as fodder to advance their gun grabbing. They need to disarm people like me before they can ever truly take our freedoms. Hitler did the same thing.

I agree, it is all about controlling others
 
Says the crowd that revulsed when Trump tried to stop violent rioters.

Says the 2nd amendment text:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
 
Last edited:
It is actually you who want to do that, by allowing a gun supply system that permits mass shooters to gun down innocent, unarmed people.

smart people realize criminals will always have weapons. Therefore I want honest folk to have them too. You admit you want a system where good people are disarmed but criminals will be well armed.
 
It's about maintaining a militia - a relic from the 18th century.
Lets test that.
When will gun grabbers actually get off their asses and come try to take them?
Certainly you could disarm millions and millions of heavily armed citizens who wish not to be disarmed. Its a relic according to you. For a relic you certainly havent had the courage to do a damn thing to it.
 
Says the 2nd amendment text:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


Yes and?
 
smart people realize criminals will always have weapons. Therefore I want honest folk to have them too. You admit you want a system where good people are disarmed but criminals will be well armed.

Not so in the UK where gun crime is rare

And the UK has banned most guns.
 
Lets test that.
When will gun grabbers actually get off their asses and come try to take them?
Certainly you could disarm millions and millions of heavily armed citizens who wish not to be disarmed. Its a relic according to you. For a relic you certainly havent had the courage to do a damn thing to it.

If/when there's ever a public appetite to repeal the 2nd amendment

Most gun owners will stand in line and meekly hand their guns in, or risk facing a big fine and/or a lengthy term in prison




Because you said:

Our second Amendment isn't about hunting. We have guns because nunya.

So I pointed out exactly what the 2nd amendment is all about.
 
I don't recall a single high profile mass shooting in this country using handguns in the past ten years. Please explain.

Both high profile mass shootings in my state of VA at VT and VaBeach both used handguns.
 
If/when there's ever a public appetite to repeal the 2nd amendment

Most gun owners will stand in line and meekly hand their guns in, or risk facing a big fine and/or a lengthy term in prison





Because you said:



So I pointed out exactly what the 2nd amendment is all about.

I dont have a gun because of that. Ask me why I do.
 
1) AR's are only favored by some mass shooters and not most. People like you have done everything possible to influence nutcases that they ought to use AR 15s

2) what sort of firearms did the founders contemplate in the second amendment

3) why are you happy having the civilian police use "military weapons" in our civilian neighborhoods

The less one knows about firearms, the more likely they are to be anti gun.

1) There is no way to talk about gun control without specifying types. IMO, what influences mass shooters to use AR's is their design, which is exclusively to make it easier to kill more, faster. That and the overwhelming amount of violence, including assault weapons, used in our everyday entertainment, like movies, tv and video games.

2) They expected them to own the type they would use if called up to war. I believe the Second should be repealed, for what its worth, so that isn't an argument that is going to sway me.

3) The only police in "neighborhoods" that I've seen carrying military style weapons is SWAT teams. Most police have a handgun. Maybe a tazer.
 
1) Dylan Root and the black church
2) Dayton shooting August 19, 2019
3) Pensacola Naval base shooting-Dec 2019
4) Va Beach shooting May 19, 2019=12 dead-handguns
5) thousand Oaks shooting 11/7/18 12 dead victims-handguns

there are dozens more. You didn't make any effort to look

But you helped me out--thanks!
 
The problem is that gang banger's going about their daily business also pick off a few 5 year old's in the process.
All the more reason to get them off this planet quickly.
 
1) There is no way to talk about gun control without specifying types. IMO, what influences mass shooters to use AR's is their design, which is exclusively to make it easier to kill more, faster. That and the overwhelming amount of violence, including assault weapons, used in our everyday entertainment, like movies, tv and video games.

2) They expected them to own the type they would use if called up to war. I believe the Second should be repealed, for what its worth, so that isn't an argument that is going to sway me.

3) The only police in "neighborhoods" that I've seen carrying military style weapons is SWAT teams. Most police have a handgun. Maybe a tazer.

many departments issue an AR 15 or a select fire M16 to squad cars. Are you aware of the fact that there are thousands upon thousands of competitive shooters who use AR 15 rifles and the US Government sold well over 300,000 similar weapons (the MI Carbine) to civilians over the last 60 years or so?
 
Back
Top Bottom