• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:473]Gun Karen Charged with Assault

As a rule, when I'm in a state that honors my permit, I am extra polite, respectful, whatever you want to call it. Knowing only what the video shows us, I wouldn't have pulled my gun.
 
The pounding can be heard in the video. Or do you just have selective hearing?

I know some people certainly hear what they want. They see it too. :roll:

There was no justifiable reason to stick a gun in that black woman's face.
 
I saw dozens of other options. But when you own a gun, it seems that becomes one of the first options you think of.

It's called, "if your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail."

If some weak minded gun owners consider their guns magic problem-solvers, that's their mindset.

This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
 
Some posters aren't here for argument, they are here to stir the pot and provoke people.

I know that some people cannot string together an argument to save their lives.
 
The window broke? And blocking the exit? They were IN a lethal weapon, no one had to get out of the car. They were safe from that woman IN the car.

Sure race may have had something to do with it but if so, it was between both of those women.

It cost the husband his job already... Their concealed carry licenses are suspended automatically in Michigan until their court case is resolved...
 
I know some people certainly hear what they want. They see it too. :roll:

They sure do, so add yourself to that list of people.

There was no justifiable reason to stick a gun in that black woman's face.

There was no justification for the white female to be harassed and threatened.

I get it, you think blacks are immune to criticism or being charged with crime. You've made that idiocy well known for some time now.
 
They sure do, so add yourself to that list of people.



There was no justification for the white female to be harassed and threatened.

I get it, you think blacks are immune to criticism or being charged with crime. You've made that idiocy well known for some time now.

There is nothing to charge the black women with under Michigan law, the idiotic couple on the other hand are now facing a felony charge each...
 
There is nothing to charge the black women with under Michigan law, the idiotic couple on the other hand are now facing a felony charge each...

And you called someone else an internet lawyer LOL!

The female black race baiter and her group of racists harassed and threatened the white couple while committing unlawful detainment. Please fail less.
 
And you called someone else an internet lawyer LOL!

The female black race baiter and her group of racists harassed and threatened the white couple while committing unlawful detainment. Please fail less.

Awwww. The snowflakes almost melted from the mean words so they pulled a gun
 
And you called someone else an internet lawyer LOL!

The female black race baiter and her group of racists harassed and threatened the white couple while committing unlawful detainment. Please fail less.

I hate to agree with these leftist wacky people but she shouldn't have pulled a gun on her.
 
Well given that some BLM protesters are getting in front of cars, stopping traffic on public roads, and then jumping on peoples cars and beating on them and in a couple of cases breaking windows and forcing people out of the car leaving it abandoned, I'd say the woman might well have felt threatened.
Not saying it rose to the level of pointing a gun but that is in the opinion of someone who wasn't there. If people would just be reasonable, do unto others, instead of being on the offensive all the time, things would be better. I'm seen way too many videos of protesters gettin up in peoples faces, including police, and calling them every vile and obscene name that they can think of. That's inexcusable. Many people would be throwing blows when that happens and the restraint by police is admirable.

I don't blame her. Rioting blacks and their Antifa handlers are committing terrorism across the entire country. Gotta protect yourself out here.
 
I don't blame her. Rioting blacks and their Antifa handlers are committing terrorism across the entire country. Gotta protect yourself out here.

Now she can protect herself in jail. Lol
 
But once you jump in front of their vehicle, prohibiting them from leaving, and then start violently attacking it might be a good time to pull a gun and get yourself some space so you can leave.

THere was no legal justification for drawing a lethal weapon. They were sitting safely IN a lethal weapon if they needed it.

There was no JOA: jeopardy, opportunity, ability.

If someone is committing a crime, you dont get to arrest and sentence...you call the cops. All they had to do was call 911 from the safety of their vehicle and the police would have enabled them to leave. If the situation turned life-threatening, they then had justification to drive their lethal weapon in a manner necessary to protect themselves.

Would have been safer too...the woman with the gun was way too close to the other woman and she had other people with her. The vehicle as protection and lethal weapon was smarter and safer.


This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
 
As a rule, when I'm in a state that honors my permit, I am extra polite, respectful, whatever you want to call it. Knowing only what the video shows us, I wouldn't have pulled my gun.

Here is a bit more context for the video.



Above in the video commentary seems to suggest that it was justified I'm having a hard time agreeing.

I do however believe the commentary when they say this woman and her daughter are trying to become a viral
 
Last edited:
And you called someone else an internet lawyer LOL!

The female black race baiter and her group of racists harassed and threatened the white couple while committing unlawful detainment. Please fail less.


I hate to agree with these leftist wacky people but she shouldn't have pulled a gun on her.

Excuse me I have to withdraw this statement. It seems the gun was pulled when a terroristic threat was made.

So it seems justifiable.

The aggressor (black woman) said that she was going to "beat your ****ing ass." She should feel lucky she wasn't shot.
 
You seem to be referring to this Michigan statute...


257.676b Interference with normal flow of vehicular or pedestrian traffic prohibited; public utility facilities; solicitation of contributions on behalf of charitable or civic organization; violation as civil infraction; local regulations; "charitable or civic organization" defined.
Sec. 676b.

Putting aside the fact this ia civil infraction (you get a ticket), do you see a problem with prosecuting someone under this statute?


:lamo

This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
 
On the contrary if you feel threatened you can pull your gun. Most states have laws that say you must try to flee before resorting to armed force, but if the other person is blocking your car you cannot flee. So what does that leave? Besides in some of the liberal cities the police have been told not to respond. Why didn't you mention that they are violating the law when they started the altercation, its assault and it's illegal.

Does not meet the standards justifying lethal force. If you arent being threatened with imminent lethal force, you cant.

If there's no gross bodily harm or forcible felony being committed...nope either.


This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
 
As a rule, when I'm in a state that honors my permit, I am extra polite, respectful, whatever you want to call it. Knowing only what the video shows us, I wouldn't have pulled my gun.


Here is a bit more context for the video.



Above in the video commentary seems to suggest that it was justified I'm having a hard time agreeing.

I do however believe the commentary when they say this woman and her daughter are trying to become a viral


Correction, at five minutes in to the video the aggressor could be heard saying " I'm going to beat your ass." Which is a terroristic threat and after this unhinged confrontation there's no way of knowing but she was really going to do.

I think the lady with the gun would have been justified in shooting her. You don't get to run around and make terroristic threats with impunity.

the couple had their guns confiscated which is a violation of the Second Amendment right and they should sue the state for that.
 
Correction, at five minutes in to the video the aggressor could be heard saying " I'm going to beat your ass." Which is a terroristic threat and after this unhinged confrontation there's no way of knowing but she was really going to do.

I think the lady with the gun would have been justified in shooting her. You don't get to run around and make terroristic threats with impunity.

the couple had their guns confiscated which is a violation of the Second Amendment right and they should sue the state for that.

Holy cow. Killing someone for what they say to you!!!!


You are completely clueless on the law
 
Correction, at five minutes in to the video the aggressor could be heard saying " I'm going to beat your ass." Which is a terroristic threat and after this unhinged confrontation there's no way of knowing but she was really going to do.

I think the lady with the gun would have been justified in shooting her. You don't get to run around and make terroristic threats with impunity.

the couple had their guns confiscated which is a violation of the Second Amendment right and they should sue the state for that.

The police just don't want Orion Township and Chipotle to be burned to the ground by marxist Black Lies Matter group and their Antifa handlers.
 
THere was no legal justification for drawing a lethal weapon.
Yes there was. I will explain.

First the aggressor in the situation is the black lady, she is clearly unhinged. This whole freak out was because they bumped into her daughter.

Right before the gun was pulled this crazy unhinged lady made a terroristic threat. "I'm gonna beat your ****ing ass" were her words I believe.

so one could take that to me that there is going to be a physical altercation and after the freak out over something that shouldn't have warranted it is perfectly reasonable to assume that she would get into a physical altercation over this. I would say the lady with a pistol would have been justified in shooting her.

Let this be a lesson. If you threaten people after acting like a deranged idiot over the simplest thing do not then be surprised if they take your terroristic threats seriously.
 
Yes there was. I will explain.

First the aggressor in the situation is the black lady, she is clearly unhinged. This whole freak out was because they bumped into her daughter.

Right before the gun was pulled this crazy unhinged lady made a terroristic threat. "I'm gonna beat your ****ing ass" were her words I believe.

so one could take that to me that there is going to be a physical altercation and after the freak out over something that shouldn't have warranted it is perfectly reasonable to assume that she would get into a physical altercation over this. I would say the lady with a pistol would have been justified in shooting her.

Let this be a lesson. If you threaten people after acting like a deranged idiot over the simplest thing do not then be surprised if they take your terroristic threats seriously.

You are wrong. You dont know the law regarding use of lethal force.

Look up: JOA

This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."

That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.

It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
 
Yes there was. I will explain.

First the aggressor in the situation is the black lady, she is clearly unhinged. This whole freak out was because they bumped into her daughter.

Right before the gun was pulled this crazy unhinged lady made a terroristic threat. "I'm gonna beat your ****ing ass" were her words I believe.

so one could take that to me that there is going to be a physical altercation and after the freak out over something that shouldn't have warranted it is perfectly reasonable to assume that she would get into a physical altercation over this. I would say the lady with a pistol would have been justified in shooting her.

Let this be a lesson. If you threaten people after acting like a deranged idiot over the simplest thing do not then be surprised if they take your terroristic threats seriously.

That is the dumbest thing ever posted
 
Back
Top Bottom