• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:165]Woman shot stealing Nazi flag

trouble13 said:
If the story in the media is accurate and she was shot while retreating from his property. It is generally considered a crime to shoot that person. That is a violation of her rights.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...



I don't think they'll say "a violation of her rights". They'll say "attempted murder."
 
trouble13 said:
If martin was justified to attack Zimmerman for instigating, then it stands to reason that the guy in this story was also justified in attacking since she was the instigator.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
I didn’t say that Martin was justified.

Regardless of the fact that Zimmerman was following Martin around his father’s community, at one point, running to keep up with Martin, the juvenile didn’t have the legal right to physically confront Zimmerman. That is a legal fact.

I can’t relate to Martin’s thoughts when he was being followed/chased by Zimmerman, because I am white and have never been (at least to the best of my knowledge) discriminated against or viewed with suspicion simply because of the color of my skin, but I can tell you that at age 17, if a strange man was following me around my own neighborhood I wouldn’t have been passive either.



As for the completely unrelated act of the **** head who shot the woman, multiple times, for stealing a flag, I hope they lock his racist ass up for many years.
 
RaleBulgarian said:
I didn’t say that Martin was justified.

Regardless of the fact that Zimmerman was following Martin around his father’s community, at one point, running to keep up with Martin, the juvenile didn’t have the legal right to physically confront Zimmerman. That is a legal fact.

I can’t relate to Martin’s thoughts when he was being followed/chased by Zimmerman, because I am white and have never been (at least to the best of my knowledge) discriminated against or viewed with suspicion simply because of the color of my skin, but I can tell you that at age 17, if a strange man was following me around my own neighborhood I wouldn’t have been passive either.



As for the completely unrelated act of the **** head who shot the woman, multiple times, for stealing a flag, I hope they lock his racist ass up for many years.
Click to expand...
It sounds like the guy was in the wrong but I am indifferent to if he gets charged or not.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
trouble13 said:
If the story in the media is accurate and she was shot while retreating from his property. It is generally considered a crime to shoot that person. That is a violation of her rights.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

IF frogs had wings, they wouldn't bump their *** when they landed, and in light of the poor accuracy history of the news media, I think we should get the facts in court. There is at least one crime involved that is unambiguous : attempted theft of property. If she was shot committing a criminal act, we'll find out about the others.
 
swing_voter said:
You think the shooter was in the right?

If that was an AR15, it would blown big chunks out of her.
Click to expand...
In the USA any nutcase can have an arsenal in his home, even a Nazi whom Americans died while destroying in the last century.
 
trouble13 said:
It sounds like the guy was in the wrong but I am indifferent to if he gets charged or not.
Click to expand...
“Indifferent” to the shooter of an unarmed (likely drunk) woman leaving his property with a stolen nazi flag, but all for the charging/conviction of the woman, when/if she recovers.

Yep, your moral compass is completely ****ing busted.
 
smallvoice said:
IF frogs had wings, they wouldn't bump their *** when they landed, and in light of the poor accuracy history of the news media, I think we should get the facts in court. There is at least one crime involved that is unambiguous : attempted theft of property. If she was shot committing a criminal act, we'll find out about the others.
Click to expand...
Sure the media could be missrepresenting the story. It would not be the first time or the last. Thats why I have been deliberate in saying my opinion is based on their version. In the circumstsnces they claim, he would be on violation of the law.
I simply dont care if he did break the law. If the law arrested these people maybe this nonsense would stop. If the law isnt gonna stop progressives, im not gonna cry for them when they end up as victims pf their victims.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
trouble13 said:
She could of avoided her fate by not taking the law into her own hands.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Blame the victim. Defend the Nazi. What a culture you lot have.
 
RaleBulgarian said:
“Indifferent” to the shooter of an unarmed (likely drunk) woman leaving his property with a stolen nazi flag, but all for the charging/conviction of the woman, when/if she recovers.

Yep, your moral compass is completely ****ing busted.
Click to expand...
I am completely apathetic to her woes. Being drunk isnt an excuse. She is a self entitled, spoiled little snowflake who had the unfortunate luck of challenging someone just as intolerant as she is. I am umempathic to how it turned out for her.


Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
swing_voter said:
You think the shooter was in the right?

If that was an AR15, it would blown big chunks out of her.
Click to expand...

If he shot her on her way up there might be a defense but not as she is running away.
 
smallvoice said:
Get that bitch in a cage so she doesn't run roughshod over some else's rights. We do have a Constitution that protects all rights, even the ones we don't like, you know?
Click to expand...

You are right... shoot people first... that is the best policy.
 
Grand Mal said:
Blame the victim. Defend the Nazi. What a culture you lot have.
Click to expand...
The nazi was her victim and she was his. I could care less about the fate of either of them.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
A snap shot of the woman would have paid better rewards to the asshole.

Now the asshole is going to jail I hope..........where he should be.
 
Tlrmln said:
A small part of me wants to say that the homeowner had the right to defend his property, but the vast majority of says lock the f-er up.
Click to expand...

Real simple, was she shot in the back or not?
If so, he's liable.
In no state whatsoever are you allowed to shoot at a fleeing suspect unless their flight is causing further danger, such as if they kidnapped someone and they are fleeing with the kidnap victim. IN THAT CASE, they are continuing to commit a crime that may be a threat to the life and safety of someone else.

A simple petty thief running away from your property?
Nope, you can't shoot them if they're running away any more than a cop can.
At least I've never heard anything that proves otherwise.
I am not a lawyer so my opinion carries very little weight unless by sheer concidence I happen to have my facts 100% straight.
 
trouble13 said:
The nazi was her victim and she was his. I could care less about the fate of either of them.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

So, you are all for shooting petty criminals. Got it.
 
swing_voter said:
You think the shooter was in the right?

If that was an AR15, it would blown big chunks out of her.
Click to expand...

Absolutely not


He's gonna claim his life was at risk ?

He should be charged with attempted murder....and it doesn't matter if it's a Nazi flag, a US flag or a box of cookies in the driveway.
 
calamity said:
So, you are all for shooting petty criminals. Got it.
Click to expand...
Reading comprehension does not seem to be your strong suit. I daid that I am indifferent to some progressive who was violating domeones rights finding herself in the position of being the victim. Do you support stealing peoples private property?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
trouble13 said:
Reading comprehension does not seem to be your strong suit. I daid that I am indifferent to some progressive who was violating domeones rights finding herself in the position of being the victim. Do you support stealing peoples private property?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Not as much as you seem to approve of shooting someone for committing what in essence was a prank.
 
calamity said:
Not as much as you seem to approve of shooting someone for committing what in essence was a prank.
Click to expand...
I dont approve or disapprove. I DON'T CARE

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom