• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Defending Tyranny

calamity said:
So, since it seems neither the NRA nor the most rabid pro-gun zealots have one word to say about the fascist response to free speech by our militarized government, are we to conclude then that the whole point of the 2nd Amendment really was to suppress freedom after all?

MW-IH757_lincol_20200602212348_ZQ.jpg


If ever there was a day that proved the gun rights Militia was designed for the fascist suppression of people's rights, especially the rights of black people, who were enslaved and then denied the basic tenets of our so-called civilized society for hundreds of years, this is it. Armed mercenaries hired by the DOJ.

Thoughts?
Click to expand...
I think you've set two new LW slobber-slinging records: volume and distance. Well done.
 
Fledermaus said:
For someone who doesn't care what they think you are pretty damned vocal about what you IMAGINE they think.

Feel free to quote any spokesperson who has stated, inferred or implied that the movement supports the "stomping on the rights of others".
Click to expand...

Because what they think is irrelevant compared to policy agenda they pursue and the power structure they support. They are a hindrance, not a help to people who want to prevent an unjustified killing like the one that happened to Taylor. Actions speak louder than words.
 
Yes_Minister said:
Because what they think is irrelevant compared to policy agenda they pursue and the power structure they support. They are a hindrance, not a help to people who want to prevent an unjustified killing like the one that happened to Taylor. Actions speak louder than words.
Click to expand...

What is the mission of Blue Lives Matter?

Oh, that's right.

You don't care.
 
Fledermaus said:
What is the mission of Blue Lives Matter?

Oh, that's right.

You don't care.
Click to expand...

Seems like their mission is to protect the police from any sort of responsibility or accountability for their actions, that is what they have produced and them saying otherwise does change the reality on the ground.

Blue Lives Matter is the ultimate exercise in conservative hypocrisy, conservatives claim they want small government and freedom, but many of them are fine with the black community being under the thumb of the militarized police.
 
Yes_Minister said:
Seems like their mission is to protect the police from any sort of responsibility or accountability for their actions, that is what they have produced and them saying otherwise does change the reality on the ground.

Blue Lives Matter is the ultimate exercise in conservative hypocrisy, conservatives claim they want small government and freedom, but many of them are fine with the black community being under the thumb of the militarized police.
Click to expand...

Sound like you don't care what they are for and against and simply want to rant....

Carry on....
 
Fledermaus said:
Sound like you don't care what they are for and against and simply want to rant....

Carry on....
Click to expand...

So what is more important what they believe or the actual policy effects they are having on the ground? We can measure the latter rather than the former and the latter is the only one that really matters.

Do you care if the police violates someone's rights like they did with Breonna Taylor?
 
Yes_Minister said:
Seems like their mission is to protect the police from any sort of responsibility or accountability for their actions, that is what they have produced and them saying otherwise does change the reality on the ground.

Blue Lives Matter is the ultimate exercise in conservative hypocrisy, conservatives claim they want small government and freedom, but many of them are fine with the black community being under the thumb of the militarized police.
Click to expand...

Chiraq needs militarized police. Stop using blinders when it comes to black on black crime.
 
iguanaman said:
There was no indication that any graffiti on the memorial had anything to with protesters or was connected with any group. I think is was likely more work by the white supremacist Trump supporters.
Click to expand...

Your thoughts are noted.

Your powers of deduction are ridiculous.
 
Michael Johnson said:
Chiraq needs militarized police. Stop using blinders when it comes to black on black crime.
Click to expand...

Except black crime is due to the legacy of redlining and systemic racism, actually improving economic conditions in these areas would do more to reduce crime than simply having more police in those areas.
 
Rich2018 said:
And hidden them down the rabbit hole...



So you're back to having your meaning changed - talk about a flip-flop faux outrage


So what was your original meaning ?
And to what, do you perceived that the meaning was changed ?

Umteenth time asked so I'm not expecting an answer, because there isn't one






Pssst...there isn't anything and never has been, except your inability to admit you're wrong and that you have nothing to whine about.
Click to expand...

It's interesting that whatever I write you assume the same mistaken assumptions.

I suppose I'll give you another chance to stop your stupidity and just have a conversation.
 
Yes_Minister said:
Breonna Taylor was killed in Kentucky by the cops, are you fine with that?

What are conservatives doing to counter police abuses? Because it seems like the cozy up to the Blue Lives Matter movement that is fine with these abuses.
Click to expand...

Why does that seem so to you?
 
code1211 said:
Why does that seem so to you?
Click to expand...

Because conservatives seem to always come with up excuses to justify the cops killing people like Philando Castile and do not seem very interested in dealing with the shooting of people like Breonna Taylor or Tamir Rice.

Either conservatives seem to come up with excuses to violate these people's rights or do bother mentioning them at all, which makes it look like they do not care about them all. If conservatives actually cared about the rights of people who were unjustly killed by the police, they would actually do something meaningful to promote change in law enforcement policy, but do not seem to do that.
 
code1211 said:
It's interesting that whatever I write you assume the same mistaken assumptions.

I suppose I'll give you another chance to stop your stupidity and just have a conversation.
Click to expand...

Look I said I was sorry if you felt offended but really there was no harm done

The meaning of your post was not changed (as proven by your repeated inability to demonstrate how it might have been)
I merely boiled your post down to the point you were making so I could address that point alone.


So sorry, but it really looks like your continuing this faux outrage to avoid admitting you were wrong.
 
Yes_Minister said:
So what is more important what they believe or the actual policy effects they are having on the ground? We can measure the latter rather than the former and the latter is the only one that really matters.

Do you care if the police violates someone's rights like they did with Breonna Taylor?
Click to expand...

By all means... Carry on with your campaign of ignorance.
 
Yes_Minister said:
Because conservatives seem to always come with up excuses to justify the cops killing people like Philando Castile and do not seem very interested in dealing with the shooting of people like Breonna Taylor or Tamir Rice.

Either conservatives seem to come up with excuses to violate these people's rights or do bother mentioning them at all, which makes it look like they do not care about them all. If conservatives actually cared about the rights of people who were unjustly killed by the police, they would actually do something meaningful to promote change in law enforcement policy, but do not seem to do that.
Click to expand...

Funny that, how conservatives, who champion gun control to defend against "tyranny", support the police's homicidal and tyrannical behavior.
 
Fledermaus said:
By all means... Carry on with your campaign of ignorance.
Click to expand...

Nice come back, I keep asking what the conservative movement is doing about the police violating the rights of citizens and no conservative here can be bothered actually give a answer to that. Its logical to assume conservatives generally do not care about people who have their rights violated by the cops, because you guys can't be bothered to answer this simple question.
 
Yes_Minister said:
Nice come back, I keep asking what the conservative movement is doing about the police violating the rights of citizens and no conservative here can be bothered actually give a answer to that. Its logical to assume conservatives generally do not care about people who have their rights violated by the cops, because you guys can't be bothered to answer this simple question.
Click to expand...

The police can act as homicidal tyrants and the right wing will condone their actions...while arguing their guns are to protect against "tyranny".
 
Yes_Minister said:
Nice come back, I keep asking what the conservative movement is doing about the police violating the rights of citizens and no conservative here can be bothered actually give a answer to that. Its logical to assume conservatives generally do not care about people who have their rights violated by the cops, because you guys can't be bothered to answer this simple question.
Click to expand...

Carry on...

You don't know and have no desire to know.

Carry on...
 
Michael Johnson said:
Chiraq needs militarized police. Stop using blinders when it comes to black on black crime.
Click to expand...

No-one needs militarized police


We have that already - we call it "the military"

We need the police to act like a police service based on consent not a police force based on subjugation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom