• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Glendale AZ Mall Shooting

Luther

Luther

Another California Refugee
DP Veteran
Joined
May 17, 2019
Messages
20,649
Reaction score
2,465
Location
Idaho
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Just curious why the Anti gun crowed has been silent on this?


Maybe because it was Armando Hernandez Jr.?


 
Sorry we must have missed this one. There are just so many shootings in America sometimes a few slip through the cracks.
 
The Glendale police responded very quickly to the shooting.
No doubt that they saved lives! :applaud

One of the responding officers, a police lieutenant with 26 years of experience, found Hernandez “immediately” and took him into custody without further incident. A video shared with The Arizona Republic showed the shooter surrender to police as soon as they approached.
 
RabidAlpaca said:
Sorry we must have missed this one. There are just so many shootings in America sometimes a few slip through the cracks.
Click to expand...


Sorry we must have missed this one.
Click to expand...

It wasn't because of Armando Hernandez Jr. was it?(LOL)?
 
This entire story must be fake. The Westgate mall is a gun-free zone, so it would be impossible for something like this to happen.

gunfree zone.jpg
 
There's not even any dead.

Hope everyone heals, and fully.
 
They get a waaaay bigger body count from the kung flu. Mass shooting? ****, that small change.
 
Silent ?

It's yet more proof that the private ownership of guns should be BANNED.


How can anyone think this incident is a good thing for any society ?
 
Rich2018 said:
Silent ?

It's yet more proof that the private ownership of guns should be BANNED.


How can anyone think this incident is a good thing for any society ?
Click to expand...

Not logical. One might as well ban cars. You know people die in car accidents. :lamo

So you want to punish those who are responsible gun owners for when some idiot goes on a rampage. I don't buy it.
 
mike2810 said:
Not logical. One might as well ban cars. You know people die in car accidents.
Click to expand...

What-about-ism

Cars are (largely) for transport
Guns are (largely) for killing


So you want to punish those who are responsible gun owners for when some idiot goes on a rampage. I don't buy it.
Click to expand...

Yes

But it's not just one is it ?

In 2019 there were more mass shootings* than days in the year


*As defined by Congress and the FBI.
 
mike2810 said:
Not logical. One might as well ban cars. You know people die in car accidents. :lamo

So you want to punish those who are responsible gun owners for when some idiot goes on a rampage. I don't buy it.
Click to expand...

What is ironic is that Australia, the UK and New Zealand have all banned guns.... Only to see a rise in gun crime, illicit guns or both.
 
Rich2018 said:
What-about-ism

Cars are (largely) for transport
Guns are (largely) for killing




Yes

But it's not just one is it ?

In 2019 there were more mass shootings* than days in the year


*As defined by Congress and the FBI.
Click to expand...

*Your references have never supported that.
 
mike2810 said:
Not logical. One might as well ban cars. You know people die in car accidents. :lamo

So you want to punish those who are responsible gun owners for when some idiot goes on a rampage. I don't buy it.
Click to expand...

Why don't you argue the logic of banning swimming pools ?
 
Just too many guncrazed people and shootings to keep with them all.
 
Rich2018 said:
Silent ?

It's yet more proof that the private ownership of guns should be BANNED.


How can anyone think this incident is a good thing for any society ?
Click to expand...

You can save far more lives tackling heart disease and cancer and get many thanks at the same time.
 
Rich2018 said:
What-about-ism

Cars are (largely) for transport
Guns are (largely) for killing




Yes

But it's not just one is it ?

In 2019 there were more mass shootings* than days in the year


*As defined by Congress and the FBI.
Click to expand...

Imagine if you could flat out ban drug use other than what patients need who are supervised by doctors. Imagine all the lives that can be saved by merely banning illegal drug use.
 
Rich2018 said:
Great, we should do

And constantly look to make cars and roads safer


And ban guns from private ownership.
Click to expand...

When you ban guns, why stop there? Violate any constitution right and you violate others with ease.
 
Robertinfremont said:
Imagine if you could flat out ban drug use other than what patients need who are supervised by doctors. Imagine all the lives that can be saved by merely banning illegal drug use.
Click to expand...


Drugs are banned aren't they ?

The UK bans gun and drugs

But whilst gun crime is very rare, drug use is unfortunately pretty common


When you ban guns, why stop there? Violate any constitution right and you violate others with ease.
Click to expand...


Perhaps you haven't kept up with the debate but no significant gun control is possible until the 2nd amendment is repealed

So no, it wouldn't be a "constitutional right".
 
Rich2018 said:
Drugs are banned aren't they ?

The UK bans gun and drugs

But whilst gun crime is very rare, drug use is unfortunately pretty common





Perhaps you haven't kept up with the debate but no significant gun control is possible until the 2nd amendment is repealed

So no, it wouldn't be a "constitutional right".
Click to expand...

That is a mountainous if there. They won't kill the second amendment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom