I see you mistook my cash on hand and shorten to cash to mean physical bills. I am thinking more the amount of funds that would be tied up by such a refund program that wouldn't be able to be used for such things as payrol, expansion, remodels, computing or tracking systems.
Nice try at backtracking
You said:
what do you expect people are going to want as a refund?
People will not want or expect CASH as a refund
They'll expect the money credited back to their credit/debit cards
Payroll etc is also paid without cash
Cash is paper money. If you see a sign of a supermarket line "
Cash Only", it means you can't use your card
Gun shops like any business will have a loan arrangement with the bank to go into the red if needed
Hard question to answer because we dont currently allow such refunds and track why. But I would guess financial reasons lead to most gun sells after a disaster.
So after the COVID-19 pandemic, you think if some new gun owners sell their guns it's because their priorities have changed
They'd rather have the money back than the gun
QED: They've just realized they don't need the gun (and want other things far more). Because if they needed the gun, it would still top their priorities
A few months what kind of idiot is proposing such foolishness. I don't support waiting periods of any kind so you're never going to get me to agree to this being needed, useful, or justifiable.
I'm proposing them to protect people from "buyers remorse" - especially in times like this when a non-rational, panic purchases happen
You're against people returning their guns for a refund and for immediate possession of the gun
No cooling off period
So if buy a gun, you're immediately stuck with your decision. People need food and medical supplies - especially with 10 million Americans just thrown out of work
And is there some mandated refund on those items if not then what do they have to do with the topic of mandated refunds on guns.
That buyer's remorse is real and people need to be protected from themselves
What about the dependents who might go hungry because daddy had a panic attack and spent half their money on a gun he will never need and never use ?
Maybe more people need to turn off their TV and stop gobbling the up doom and gloom being feed to them.
Or maybe news programs need to be less sensationalist - but that's hard as no-one will watch boring news
The news networks whose lead story every night is a double homicide and home invasion will get the viewers
It's a horrible idea but thanks for presenting it as a good example of what not to do.
In your opinion
It would be a great idea for ordinary people, a horrible idea for peddlers of guns and manufacturers of guns perhaps.