Robbery suspect shot, killed Employees, customers inside pharmacy were unharmed

RF667799 · Mar 20, 2020

Rich2018 said:
No, death by gun shot...in a gun control debate

SMH

You have absolutely no clue what you're talking about and instead flail like a hysterical girl, desperately trying to salvage a point.

Read again: "died of gun shot wounds"

And you're like "oh no, there was also a stabbing nearby so it can't be a gun control topic"

You're pathetic posts are a joke.

Support your claim that I said, "it can't be a gun control topic."

Why did you stand in blind denial of posters who pointed out the stabbing death that you posted within your own evidence? Going so far as disparaging the reading abilities of those who called your attention to it?

Why do you continue the personal attacks when you are on record as claiming such an action denotes the loser of a debate?

Rich2018 · Mar 20, 2020

RF667799 said:
Support your claim that I said, "it can't be a gun control topic." ...

You're obsession with negating the quoted story because it also mentions a stabbing.

RF667799 · Mar 20, 2020

Rich2018 said:
You're obsession with negating the quoted story because it also mentions a stabbing.

You probably meant "your."

Failure to support your claim noted.

Rich2018 · Mar 20, 2020

RF667799 said:
You probably meant "your."

Failure to support your claim noted.

No I meant "you're"

I actually meant to type obsessed - thank you for the English lesson, I love to learn of when I've made a typo.

Your lack of argument and pathetic attempt to score a point was noted some time ago.

Just stop.

RF667799 · Mar 20, 2020

Rich2018 said:
No I meant "you're"

I actually meant to type obsessed - thank you for the English lesson, I love to learn of when I've made a typo.

Your lack of argument and pathetic attempt to score a point was noted some time ago.

Just stop.

Still not even an attempt to support your claim. Nothing but hand waves.

marke · Mar 20, 2020

Moonglow said:
I do wish we had the gory, bloody aftermath pictures to really drive the message home...

It is better for the murderer to be covered in his own blood than for dozens of his victims to be covered in their blood.

Rich2018 · Mar 20, 2020

RF667799 said:
Still not even an attempt to support your claim. Nothing but hand waves.

The claim that the news story concerned gun mis-use wasn't supported by "gun shot wounds" ?

You don't know how to stop.

You're like some kind of toy that spews out one of a limited number of lines when you pull its string

End of conversation.

RF667799 · Mar 20, 2020

Rich2018 said:
The claim that the news story concerned gun mis-use wasn't supported by "gun shot wounds" ?

You don't know how to stop.

You're like some kind of toy that spews out one of a limited number of lines when you pull its string

End of conversation.

No, your claim that I said, " it can't be a gun control topic".

You fail to support that.

Rich2018 · Mar 20, 2020

RF667799 said:
No, your claim that I said, " it can't be a gun control topic".

You fail to support that.

Post # 32

End of conversation.

Your pathetic posts are not worth replying to

I'm not going to "pull the doll's string" any more.

It really is the end this time.

RF667799 · Mar 20, 2020

Rich2018 said:
Post # 32

End of conversation.

Your pathetic posts are not worth replying to

I'm not going to "pull the doll's string" any more.

It really is the end this time.

Post 32 doesn't support the false quotation you have attributed to me.

Waddy · Mar 21, 2020

When guns simply aren't available, bombs seem to be the preference. Sometimes even if guns are readily available. Remember Oklahoma City. Some people like to burn down black churches, with little girls inside. Others like to drive trucks through crowds. The possibilities are endless.

Moonglow · Mar 21, 2020

marke said:
It is better for the murderer to be covered in his own blood than for dozens of his victims to be covered in their blood.

You'd never make it as a slasher director..

Rich2018 · Mar 21, 2020

Waddy said:
When guns simply aren't available, bombs seem to be the preference...

No, terrorists have used bombs, occasionally people have used them in hate crimes Oklahoma City and Boston

But when guns are not available the evidence is that knives are preferred.

In the UK, there have been three recent, Muslim terrorist attacks in London - all three were committed with knives.

RF667799 · Mar 21, 2020

Rich2018 said:
No, terrorists have used bombs, occasionally people have used them in hate crimes Oklahoma City and Boston

But when guns are not available the evidence is that knives are preferred.

In the UK, there have been three recent, Muslim terrorist attacks in London - all three were committed with knives.

Luckily, your gun banning scheme leaves guns available.

Waddy · Mar 21, 2020

Rich2018 said:
No, terrorists have used bombs, occasionally people have used them in hate crimes Oklahoma City and Boston

But when guns are not available the evidence is that knives are preferred.

In the UK, there have been three recent, Muslim terrorist attacks in London - all three were committed with knives.

You don't remember all the IRA bombings in and around London? Short memory, I guess.

Rich2018 · Mar 21, 2020

Waddy said:
You don't remember all the IRA bombings in and around London? Short memory, I guess.

They were TERRORIST attacks
By a TERRORIST organization

You said:

When guns simply aren't available, bombs seem to be the preference.

In the case of Irish terrorism, bombs were the preference, even when guns were available....certainly on the British mainland.

These days, when bombs and guns are not available, Muslim terrorists in London have used knives on three separate occasion, with much less death and injury than would be have been caused by guns.

Waddy · Mar 21, 2020

Rich2018 said:
They were TERRORIST attacks
By a TERRORIST organization

You said:

In the case of Irish terrorism, bombs were the preference, even when guns were available....certainly on the British mainland.

These days, when bombs and guns are not available, Muslim terrorists in London have used knives on three separate occasion, with much less death and injury than would be have been caused by guns.

And they often resort to bombs.

Rich2018 · Mar 21, 2020

Waddy said:
And they often resort to bombs.

Organized terrorists do, which aren't part of the gun control debate IMO

It's very uncommon for private individuals to use bombs to kill people. I can think of only two such bombs in the USA in recent times and I can't recall a single bomb (since the end of Irish terrorism) in the UK.