- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Messages
- 88,729
- Reaction score
- 39,677
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: Women Being Involved In The Gun Debate
Pets are live and have value. An unborn baby is worthless and any rando stranger could cause an abortion by punching a woman in the belly and by guilty of nothing more than simple assault...right?What makes you think that she supports that?Not that that's wrong.**
You are wrong about that anyway...since those charges, when brought *by the states, never federal* are brought on behalf of the mother and/or the state...meaning the concern is the damages, the loss, to "the woman or the state."
States can charge people for killing pets and livestock too, those are also on behalf of others, in that case, owners. It's still a crime because the state recognizes that the unborn, the pet, the livestock *all have value to the woman or owners.*
And that makes perfect sense. A pregnant woman is someone who wants a her baby :doh and such a loss is huge to her/her husband/bf. It's sad that this needs to be explained.
**And that's why it's not hypocritical to support those laws...they recognize the pain and loss of mother/couple, people who obviously wanted the pregnancy and someday, a baby.