• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Colion Noir: Wife with AR saves husband daughters' lives during home invasion

One of the comments on the Youtube video page:



:lamo :lamo :lamo

the recidivism rate of criminals who are killed by their intended victims or by police is zero.
 
No gun control to reduce mass shootings is being debated

Funny it's what yours would say (if indeed you have a wife)

But my penis is bigger than yours

The army has lower standards of recruitment than who ?

What an absolutely devastating come back...totally disarming but doing nothing to increase the size of your penis

No it doesn't

Citation needed

So far none.

I guess you were too lazy or embarrased to post the n umer of shots in an average firefight.

What's the maximum number a citizen has had cause to fire ?

A lazy response in lieu of a reasoned argument.
You’ve certainly been entertaining, but I’m becoming bored so I’ll leave you now to play with yourself.
 
insurance companies? the speed limit is the same as restrictions on how you can use a firearm. Just as you cannot drive 100 MPH on municipal roads, you cannot shoot rifles in many urban areas

And how would insurance companies benefit ?

So ou really think the driving force behind seat belt laws and/or speed limits was from insurance companies


The pro-gun lobby argument just got a whole lot more stupid.


"New York State passed the first law in the US mandating the use of seat belts in 1984 under the leadership of John D. States, an orthopedic surgeon who dedicated his career to improving automotive safety."



Seat belt legislation - Wikipedia



You really do talk without thinking or checking facts.
 
And how would insurance companies benefit ?

So ou really think the driving force behind seat belt laws and/or speed limits was from insurance companies


The pro-gun lobby argument just got a whole lot more stupid.


"New York State passed the first law in the US mandating the use of seat belts in 1984 under the leadership of John D. States, an orthopedic surgeon who dedicated his career to improving automotive safety."



Seat belt legislation - Wikipedia



You really do talk without thinking or checking facts.

that is akin to ranges requiring shooters to use eye and ear protection at all time. wearing a seat belt in no way prevents me from owning a car and I only have to wear a SB while operating the vehicle on public property. You want to BAN Firearms./
 
that is akin to ranges requiring shooters to use eye and ear protection at all time. wearing a seat belt in no way prevents me from owning a car and I only have to wear a SB while operating the vehicle on public property. You want to BAN Firearms./

Just try to think for a moment - having been proved stupidly wrong with your claim that insurance companies might have been responsible for seat belt legislation.

You might not be the ONLY person in the car. There might be child who doesn't know any better.



Do you really claim some kind of legal background because I think if you do it's totally fake.
 
Just try to think for a moment - having been proved stupidly wrong with your claim that insurance companies might have been responsible for seat belt legislation.

You might not be the ONLY person in the car. There might be child who doesn't know any better.




Do you really claim some kind of legal background because I think if you do it's totally fake.


sarcasm isn't your strong point but insurance companies were major supporters of both seat belt legislation air bags and biker helmet laws

The Insurance Industry’s Liberal Turn
 
sarcasm isn't your strong point...



Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, but the highest form of intelligence.

Oscar Wilde



...insurance companies were major supporters of both seat belt legislation air bags and biker helmet laws...




You realize that article states insurance companies also support Obama care - which I suspect you don't

"...take Obamacare. Acting entirely out of self-interest, the U.S. health-insurance industry ultimately supported the Affordable Care Act..."


And supports gun control:


"...but insurance companies are stepping in. Regardless of executives’ beliefs about gun control, they know that more guns being carried around tends to lead to more shootings..."



Are you sure you want to use that web page. Yes insurance companies saw that seat belt laws resulted in less/lower claims
The medical profession also back local governments who proposed such laws.
 
Back
Top Bottom