• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

...you're More Likely to Shoot a Loved One

Yep. The last refuge of a scoundrel.

I'd say children are the last refuge of the scoundrel. Most idiocy today is justified as "doing it for the children" ON BOTH SIDES
 
It is called Patriotism my friend.... PATRIOTISM.

So trumpeting about your patriotism is the same as bellowing about your religion.

By gosh, I think you've really hit on something here, Haymarket.
 
I know one thing, you know nothing about it or you would not have written something so ridiculously asinine.

If you study the effects of smoking, you grab a 100 people in Minnesota who smoke and compare them to 100 people living there who do not. You do not compare them to 100 people living in ****ing Tahiti.

ACTUALLY.. yes you do.. you absolutely do. Because the environmental conditions in Minnesota..may be such that there is no statistical difference between smokers and non smokers. It could be possible that cancer rates may be similar if say the environmental conditions in Minnesota are such that there is a similar variable (for example if all those living in Minnesota are exposed to carcinogens released into the air from manufacturing plants) that is cancer causing..

Comparing smokers in both Minnesota and Tahiti.. vs nonsmokers in both Minnesota and Tahiti.. would help cancel out the variable of the carcinogens from manufacturing plants.
 
Dogs are mans best friend. Guns are nearly the opposite.

Dogs harm people without any action on the part of humans.

A gun never jumped up on its own and shot anyone.
 
I'd say children are the last refuge of the scoundrel. Most idiocy today is justified as "doing it for the children" ON BOTH SIDES

Children are a useful go-to resort, yeah, but without breaking a sweat I could justify lots of kinds of extremism and violence by citing patriotism. Scoundrels of every stripe and odour can use it. An ANTIFA thug slingshotting rocks at riot police and an alt.right racist driving his car into a group of protesters can both claim to be motivated by love of country.
 
So trumpeting about your patriotism is the same as bellowing about your religion.

By gosh, I think you've really hit on something here, Haymarket.

Uh - no. Would hope ALL Americans are patriotic. As for religion - that is another story altogether.
 
Dogs harm people without any action on the part of humans.

A gun never jumped up on its own and shot anyone.

How many scores of millions have died from dogs?
 
Dogs harm people without any action on the part of humans.

A gun never jumped up on its own and shot anyone.

Maybe you can start a thread on that in the pets sub forum. :roll:
 
Dogs are mans best friend. Guns are nearly the opposite.
I think that peace officers should be forbidden from carrying guns. Guns kill people, and we don't want our peace officers killing people. Problem solved. You're welcome.
 
I think that peace officers should be forbidden from carrying guns. Guns kill people, and we don't want our peace officers killing people. Problem solved. You're welcome.

Does Rod Serling narrate your posts?
 
Does Rod Serling narrate your posts?

haha. funny. You're a funny guy.

So where do you you stand in this issue. Do you think that arms are needed by peace officers? If so, do why do you want to kill people?
 
haha. funny. You're a funny guy.

So where do you you stand in this issue. Do you think that arms are needed by peace officers? If so, do why do you want to kill people?

I love it when politicians call things like GLOCK 17s and AR 15 rifles WEAPONS OF WAR, yet those same politicians authorize "Peace officers" to carry "weapons of war"
 
Its true. About 4.5 million people are bitten by dogs every year in the USA. Truth hurt?

If most dog owners voted for the GOP and the AKC mainly supported conservatives, I suspect many of our leftist posters would be calling for dog bans
 
I love it when politicians call things like GLOCK 17s and AR 15 rifles WEAPONS OF WAR, yet those same politicians authorize "Peace officers" to carry "weapons of war"

They pretty much want to dominate their fellow man. Once you realize this, everything they say makes sense.
 
I love it when politicians call things like GLOCK 17s and AR 15 rifles WEAPONS OF WAR, yet those same politicians authorize "Peace officers" to carry "weapons of war"

Kinda like falsely claiming that anyone who wants responsible gun ownership laws is a 'gun banner.'. All that hyperbolic, over the top nonsense does is put responsible gun owners in a bad light. Gun nutters are responsible gun owners worst enemy.
 
Kinda like falsely claiming that anyone who wants responsible gun ownership laws is a 'gun banner.'. All that hyperbolic, over the top nonsense does is put responsible gun owners in a bad light. Gun nutters are responsible gun owner's worst enemy.

So you don't want to ban anything?
 
I'm undecided on certain types of weapons. I would have said NO in the past.

Your reply is ambiguous. Do you want to ban anything? That's what I asked you.
 
Back
Top Bottom