• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gun Control Advocate's True Intentions Exposed

D

DebateChallenge

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 30, 2017
Messages
12,099
Reaction score
3,439
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
All too often the gun control advocates will say stuff such as, "We're not out to take your guns, we just want to have some common sense regulation," and other malarkey such as that. Well this woman who is a big gun control advocate who sadly lost a brother in the 9/11 terrorist attacks, she exposed the gun control advocates for what they really want to do. They want to "get guns out of the hands of innocent individuals" as she puts it. That is exactly what she says when she uses, or should I say abuses, her opportunity to speak at the 9/11 memorial this past Wednesday.

So there you have it, its very clear, the gun control crowd wants to take guns from innocent people. Here is a clip of her speaking, she doesn't start speaking until 1:46 before that its this man who is criticizing a representative.

At 2:14 is when she starts talking about getting guns out of the hands of innocent individuals.

YouTube
 
DebateChallenge said:
All too often the gun control advocates will say stuff such as, "We're not out to take your guns, we just want to have some common sense regulation," and other malarkey such as that. Well this woman who is a big gun control advocate who sadly lost a brother in the 9/11 terrorist attacks, she exposed the gun control advocates for what they really want to do. They want to "get guns out of the hands of innocent individuals" as she puts it. That is exactly what she says when she uses, or should I say abuses, her opportunity to speak at the 9/11 memorial this past Wednesday.

So there you have it, its very clear, the gun control crowd wants to take guns from innocent people. Here is a clip of her speaking, she doesn't start speaking until 1:46 before that its this man who is criticizing a representative.

At 2:14 is when she starts talking about getting guns out of the hands of innocent individuals.

YouTube
Click to expand...


When gun control advocates praise the gun control laws of the UK and Australia and compare our laws and homicide rates to theirs its pretty obvious to anyone with a brain their goal is confiscation. People who support the 2nd amendment do not praise the gun control of those countries nor do they compare our homicide rates to theirs. People who support certain rights don't praise the countries where those rights are severely restricted or outright banned. For example people who support elective abortion rights don't compare our abortion laws to that of Ireland, El Salvador, and Chile.
 
Last edited:
jamesrage said:
When gun control advocates praise the gun control laws of the UK and Australia and compare our laws and homicide rates to theirs its pretty obvious to anyone with a brain their goal is confiscation. People who support the 2nd amendment do not praise the gun control of those countries nor do they compare our homicide rates to theirs. People who support certain rights don't praise the countries where those rights are severely restricted or outright banned. For example people who support elective abortion rights don't compare our abortion laws to that of Ireland, El Salvador, and Chile.
Click to expand...

If anything, it would be people who want to ban or severely restrict abortion in the USA who would compare us with Ireland, El Salvador, and Chile where abortion is much more restricted than it is in most places in the USA, but that discussion belongs in the abortion folder.

Comparing the USA with the UK, especially in terms of gun rights and regulations, is bad. The USA has been independent of the UK ever since 1776 and we won our independence through the use of guns. Anybody in the USA who says we should follow the UKs example in terms of gun regulations is a Benedict Arnold and a traitor.
 
DebateChallenge said:
If anything, it would be people who want to ban or severely restrict abortion in the USA who would compare us with Ireland, El Salvador, and Chile where abortion is much more restricted than it is in most places in the USA, but that discussion belongs in the abortion folder.
Click to expand...

Many anti-2nd amendment trash are trying to masquerade as being pro-2nd amendment. They something retarded like "I support the 2nd amendment but I also support "reasonable" gun control laws.Which is code for they wish to ban all sorts of firearms. You would never see someone in America saying they support abortion rights while saying Ireland, El Salvadore and Chile have good abortion laws.But yet we got politicians and even some posters who claim they support the 2nd amendment while praising the gun control laws of the UK and Australia.


Comparing the USA with the UK, especially in terms of gun rights and regulations, is bad. The USA has been independent of the UK ever since 1776 and we won our independence through the use of guns. Anybody in the USA who says we should follow the UKs example in terms of gun regulations is a Benedict Arnold and a traitor.
Click to expand...

Its also bad because the UK has for a long time had significantly lower homicides than ours even before their draconian gun control laws and those homicides didn't change much after the implementation of those draconian gun control laws. Its like putting speed bumps on a street where no nobody speeds and using that street as an example of speed bumps solving the problem of speeding through nieghborhoods. That is basically what the anti-2nd amendment trash do when they are comparing the US to the UK regarding gun control laws.
 
jamesrage said:
Many anti-2nd amendment trash are trying to masquerade as being pro-2nd amendment. They something retarded like "I support the 2nd amendment but I also support "reasonable" gun control laws.Which is code for they wish to ban all sorts of firearms. You would never see someone in America saying they support abortion rights while saying Ireland, El Salvadore and Chile have good abortion laws.But yet we got politicians and even some posters who claim they support the 2nd amendment while praising the gun control laws of the UK and Australia.
Click to expand...
An American who supports abortion rights would probably mention countries in much of eastern Europe which are I believe among the most permissive countries in allowing abortion and which have the highest numbers of abortions, but as I said, this discussion belongs in the abortion folder.

jamesrage said:
Its also bad because the UK has for a long time had significantly lower homicides than ours even before their draconian gun control laws and those homicides didn't change much after the implementation of those draconian gun control laws. Its like putting speed bumps on a street where no nobody speeds and using that street as an example of speed bumps solving the problem of speeding through nieghborhoods. That is basically what the anti-2nd amendment trash do when they are comparing the US to the UK regarding gun control laws.
Click to expand...
Exactly, although there is one big and very important difference. If you're not going to speed, having speed bumps is not going to affect you. If you're not going to murder, having strict gun laws will effect you in that it will infringe on your right to keep and bear arms guns.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom