- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
- Messages
- 21,605
- Reaction score
- 8,557
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I've been asking this question directly to many of the gun control fans here lately, and they all seem to be dodging the question.
I'm not interested in the debate about what "assault weapon" or any similar phrase supposedly mean historically or otherwise. I'm talking about the term as defined in the legislation that has been proposed by Democrats in Congress.
What makes a weapon that fits this definition more deadly than many other weapons that don't? And to save me trouble of asking later, let's see the evidence for your claim.
I'm not interested in the debate about what "assault weapon" or any similar phrase supposedly mean historically or otherwise. I'm talking about the term as defined in the legislation that has been proposed by Democrats in Congress.
What makes a weapon that fits this definition more deadly than many other weapons that don't? And to save me trouble of asking later, let's see the evidence for your claim.