- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
- Messages
- 21,605
- Reaction score
- 8,557
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
1. Because it defines the bounds of what can be done. No one need accept your presumption that gun rights must be at the biggest level they can be maintained at under the 2nd.
In what world does what we need for self defense (or for any other purpose) necessarily "define the bounds of what can be done?" Should we apply that same rule to everything else that people enjoy, or just the things that kill a lot of people, like alcohol and cars?
2. Wow. Read that again in context a few times.
Sorry, you'll have to explain what context I'm supposed to use. Is there a context in which cops need to kill lots of people as fast as possible?
Oh, don't worry, I'm not coming for your guns. You've got a stranglehold on congress. Your guns aren't going anywhere.
That'll only be true as long as people are willing to dispute the bull.